Re: FreeBSD-SA-11:07.chroot and ProFTPD 1.3.3g

2012-01-05 Thread Henk van Oers
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Xin Li wrote: On 01/04/12 10:10, Henk van Oers wrote: [make world again] But still it's not working :( Could you please do: grep __FreeBSD_libc_enter_restricted_mode /usr/lib/libc.so And see if the output would be: Binary file /usr/lib/libc.so matches [root@dee ~]#

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

2012-01-05 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:52:40 +1000 Da Rock freebsd-po...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/04/12 23:27, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rockfreebsd-po...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: I've been advised I should attempt to port this for general use to

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

2012-01-05 Thread Chris Rees
On 5 Jan 2012 04:13, Janketh Jay jan...@unfs.us wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys! On 01/04/2012 08:19 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:20:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: On 01/05/12 12:11, Chad Perrin wrote: The best way to learn, I think, is

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

2012-01-05 Thread Chris Rees
On 4 Jan 2012 23:58, Da Rock freebsd-po...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/05/12 01:41, Chad Perrin wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:31:51 +1000 Da Rock freebsd-po...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: I was advised to

Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)

2012-01-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On January 5, 2012 12:22:45 PM +1000 Da Rock freebsd-po...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: Ok. I've been working through the handbook step by step, and I'm stuck at checksums so I probably haven't yet reached that part yet. I'll check it out now To get the checksums, type make fetch

FreeBSD Port: f2c-20060810_3 - Missing Extract depend unzip

2012-01-05 Thread Jason Hall
Hello, In FreeBSD 9.0, unzip was added to the base install. As a result, the PORT fails to extract properly, because it is trying to use /usr/local/bin/unzip, instead of the built in /usr/bin/unzip. The reason is the EXTRACT_DEPENDS=unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip line in the Makefile,

status report on ports and clang

2012-01-05 Thread Mark Linimon
As of early December, I have been able to get FreeBSD's secondary ports cluster (pointyhat-west.isc.FreeBSD.org) to the point where it is able to more quickly build the entire ports tree with clang as the default compiler. You can see the current state here:

Re: FreeBSD Port: f2c-20060810_3 - Missing Extract depend unzip

2012-01-05 Thread Maho NAKATA
Hi Jason Ok, hopefully I'll fix it in this weekend. or - if clean patch is available and you're a committer, please commit. thanks Nakata Maho From: Jason Hall cake...@gmail.com Subject: FreeBSD Port: f2c-20060810_3 - Missing Extract depend unzip Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:56:04 -0500 Hello,

Feasibility of splitting out web components of lang/php5

2012-01-05 Thread Doug Barton
I do package build systems that support a variety of types of end systems. (Nearly) all of them use php in some form or another, but a substantial portion of them don't have web servers, and therefore don't need the cgi, apache module, or the apache dependency that comes with them. What would

Re: Feasibility of splitting out web components of lang/php5

2012-01-05 Thread John Marshall
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012, 20:20 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: What would make my life a whole lot simpler is if lang/php5 were the command line version, and the cgi and apache modules were separate ports. Is this feasible? Don't the port's knobs work for you? If I set the CGI knob off, I get what I

Re: Feasibility of splitting out web components of lang/php5

2012-01-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/05/2012 21:45, John Marshall wrote: On Thu, 05 Jan 2012, 20:20 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: What would make my life a whole lot simpler is if lang/php5 were the command line version, and the cgi and apache modules were separate ports. Is this feasible? Don't the port's knobs work for