Re: optionsng and tinderbox?

2012-06-21 Thread Ganael LAPLANCHE
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:50:56 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote > Fixed in the latest iteration of the patches on Freefall. > While I was there, I made the equivalent change with respect > to openldap23-server (ie. not using OPTIONS_DIR at all) although that > makes little difference as openldap23-cli

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2012-06-21 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:24:55PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 21.06.2012 10:29, schrieb lini...@freebsd.org: > > portname: audio/gstreamer-plugins-flite > > description:Gstreamer flite run-time speech synthesis engine > > plugin > > maintainer: mul

Re: [ bsd.port.mk ] improper evaluation of config-recursive target

2012-06-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:42:13PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 6/21/2012 2:02 PM, Alexander Pronin wrote: > > Hello porters, > > My name is Alexander Pronin. I am a GSOC intern. My project is > > (http://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2012/Parallelization_in_the_ports_collection#preview) > > >

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2012-06-21 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:10:47PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: > Is this only for "Ports" which don't build or "Ports" which have other > issues?? You'll have to consult each port to see its message, but the vast majority are marked that way because the do not build properly, or deinstall properly, o

Re: [ bsd.port.mk ] improper evaluation of config-recursive target

2012-06-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 6/21/2012 2:02 PM, Alexander Pronin wrote: > Hello porters, > My name is Alexander Pronin. I am a GSOC intern. My project is > (http://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2012/Parallelization_in_the_ports_collection#preview) > > It is assumed that if a user calls > > %make config-recursive > > then

[ bsd.port.mk ] improper evaluation of config-recursive target

2012-06-21 Thread Alexander Pronin
Hello porters, My name is Alexander Pronin. I am a GSOC intern. My project is (http://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2012/Parallelization_in_the_ports_collection#preview) It is assumed that if a user calls %make config-recursive then options of current port and all it's dependency ports will be p

Re: samba36 port unable to build PAM backends?

2012-06-21 Thread Kaya Saman
On 06/21/2012 05:23 PM, Chris Rees wrote: Best to include maintainer in CC. On Jun 20, 2012 3:26 PM, "Kaya Saman" > wrote: Have sent a separate email to them.. including same info. Wish this could be sorted soon as am so excited to show-off FreeBSD as mail b

Re: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7)

2012-06-21 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:27:04PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 21.06.2012 11:37, Wesley Shields wrote: > > The release in our ports tree is not recommended upstream anymore. > > Quoting the upstream webpage: "Take note they [old releases] won't > > usually work with recent LLVM and GNUstep releas

Re: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7)

2012-06-21 Thread Mikhail T.
On 21.06.2012 11:37, Wesley Shields wrote: The release in our ports tree is not recommended upstream anymore. Quoting the upstream webpage: "Take note they [old releases] won't usually work with recent LLVM and GNUstep releases." Do we have these recent LLVM and GNUstep releases in the tree alre

Re: samba36 port unable to build PAM backends?

2012-06-21 Thread Chris Rees
Best to include maintainer in CC. On Jun 20, 2012 3:26 PM, "Kaya Saman" wrote: ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7)

2012-06-21 Thread Boris Samorodov
21.06.2012 19:37, Wesley Shields пишет: The release in our ports tree is not recommended upstream anymore. Quoting the upstream webpage: "Take note they [old releases] won't usually work with recent LLVM and GNUstep releases." As the port is unmaintained and the version in our tree is not recom

Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7

2012-06-21 Thread Boris Samorodov
21.06.2012 14:54, Michael Scheidell пишет: On 6/21/12 6:32 AM, Mikhail T. wrote: On 21.06.2012 04:30, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: portname: x11/etoile description:Metaport for Etoile desktop maintainer:po...@freebsd.org deprecated because: API no longe

Re: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7)

2012-06-21 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:40:15AM +, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Sorry if I confused you with more than one comment in one email. Next > time I will send multiple emails with just one comment in each email. > I hope this helps. Please try to be civil. > -Original message- > From: "M

RE: Need advice on a problems with the Django CMS port

2012-06-21 Thread xenophon\+freebsd
Thank you all for your feedback! > Depends on the port. If it can use more than one database system > at a time, then the OPTIONS_MULTI "at least one of these" would be > right. In this case, OPTIONS_MULTI is correct. Django CMS can use one or more of those database backends. I'm going to turn

Re: Need advice on a problems with the Django CMS port

2012-06-21 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:38 PM, xenophon\+freebsd wrote: Hi all, I maintain the Django CMS port (www/py-django-cms).  I could use some advice on the following problem both from other maintainers a

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2012-06-21 Thread Kaya Saman
Is this only for "Ports" which don't build or "Ports" which have other issues?? I posted an issue with the net/samba36 port where it doesn't seem to create the PAM module?? Regards, Kaya On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > lini...@freebsd.org wrote: >> As part of an on

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2012-06-21 Thread Julian H. Stacey
lini...@freebsd.org wrote: > As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in > the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports Hi all, Reports should be ordered to draw the interest of readers, these aren't yet. Probably: Many readers on ports@ often delete thes

Re: optionsng and tinderbox?

2012-06-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 21/06/2012 10:26, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: >> > However on inspection, openldap24-server and openldap24-client take >> > different sets of options: -server takes a super-set of -client. So >> > having a shared OPTIONSFILE doesn't make sense to me [...] > You're right ! This is now fixed in the

Re: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7)

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
Sorry if I confused you with more than one comment in one email. Next time I will send multiple emails with just one comment in each email. I hope this helps. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >|SECNAP Network Security -Original message- From: "Mikhail T." To: Michael Scheidell Cc: "freebs

etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7)

2012-06-21 Thread Mikhail T.
On 21.06.2012 06:54, Michael Scheidell wrote: you are more then welcome to adopt them. Is the above REALLY, what "API no longer supported" means these days? -mi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2012-06-21 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 21.06.2012 10:29, schrieb lini...@freebsd.org: > portname: audio/gstreamer-plugins-flite > description:Gstreamer flite run-time speech synthesis engine > plugin > maintainer: multime...@freebsd.org > status: BROKEN > deprecated because: B

Re: Unable to build "graphics/ImageMagick" port

2012-06-21 Thread Carmel
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:19:40 -0700 Kevin Oberman articulated: {snip} > To be really, really clear, did you build and install ImageMagick with > HDRI (but not running tests)? Did you then try building again, but > have the analyze.sh test bombed out? Yes & Yes > After building and installing wi

Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 6/21/12 6:32 AM, Mikhail T. wrote: On 21.06.2012 04:30, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: portname: x11/etoile description:Metaport for Etoile desktop maintainer:po...@freebsd.org deprecated because: API no longer supported expiration date:2012-07-20

Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 474, Issue 7

2012-06-21 Thread Mikhail T.
On 21.06.2012 04:30, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: portname: x11/etoile description:Metaport for Etoile desktop maintainer:po...@freebsd.org deprecated because: API no longer supported expiration date:2012-07-20 build errors: none. overview:http://portsmon.F

Re: optionsng and tinderbox?

2012-06-21 Thread Ganael LAPLANCHE
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:28:26 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote Hi Matthew, Baptiste, Thank you very much for your answers. With your patch, Matthew, setting : openldap24-client_SET+=FETCH in make.conf now works for net/openldap24-client : $ cd /usr/ports/net/openldap24-client $ make -V PORT_OPTIONS

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2012-06-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

2012-06-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2012-06-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2012-06-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2012-06-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl