Xorg totally unusable with KMS and new Xorg on Sandy Bridge system: how to undo

2013-02-08 Thread Robert Huff
Thomas Mueller writes: I built the newer Xorg and it falls flat: goes to a nongraphic screen that is blank except for a rectangular cursor in the upper left corner, and now I want to get back to the earlier Xorg. System is Intel Sandy Bridge with i7 CPU. You don't mention

libtelepathy-qt4 issue causes failure when upgrading kde4.

2013-02-08 Thread David Southwell
Here is an en extract from the script: -- Found Sqlite: /usr/local/include -- Found Strigi: /usr/local/lib/libstreams.so -- Found QCA2: /usr/local/lib/libqca.so -- Found gpgme-config at /usr/local/bin/gpgme-config -- Found gpgme v1.3.2, checking for flavours... -- Found flavour 'vanilla',

x11/kde4-runtime

2013-02-08 Thread Jerry
I have (had) /shells/bash-devel installed on my system. When updating KDE4, I discovered that the x11/kde4-runtime port and others that depend on shells/bash will not build if shell/bash-devel is installed. Presently, these ports are identical. I am not sure if I should report this as a possible

how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I just installed 9.1-release including the ports tree: root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn info /usr/ports/ Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/branches/RELENG_9_1_0 Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5

Re: FreeBSD Port: wbar-2.3.4 upgrade

2013-02-08 Thread Leslie Jensen
2013-02-08 15:23, Nicola Vitale skrev: Hi, [2013/2/7 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu] I'm now getting wbar in the middle of the screen standing vertically even though I use the command wbar -above-desk -bpress -pos bottom -nanim 7 I have just tried that command and it works fine on my

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/8/13 9:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I just installed 9.1-release including the ports tree: root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn info /usr/ports/ Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/branches/RELENG_9_1_0

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From da...@catwhisker.org Fri Feb 8 15:04:41 2013 On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:47:05PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I just installed 9.1-release including the ports tree: =20 root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn info /usr/ports/ Path: . Working

Re: FreeBSD Port: wbar-2.3.4 upgrade

2013-02-08 Thread Leslie Jensen
2013-02-08 15:23, Nicola Vitale skrev: Hi, [2013/2/7 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu] I'm now getting wbar in the middle of the screen standing vertically even though I use the command wbar -above-desk -bpress -pos bottom -nanim 7 I have just tried that command and it works fine on my

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/8/13 10:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: From glar...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 8 14:54:13 2013 On 2/8/13 9:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I just installed 9.1-release including the ports tree: root@zzz:/usr/ports # svn info /usr/ports/

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Robert Huff
Anton Shterenlikht writes: You already have (achieved this): ports is (still) not brnched as src is. We use the head of the ports tree for all branches of FreeBSD. I don't think it's true. While still on 9.1 ports, the latest entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)

Re: FreeBSD Port: wbar-2.3.4 upgrade

2013-02-08 Thread Leslie Jensen
2013-02-08 15:23, Nicola Vitale skrev: Hi, [2013/2/7 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu] I'm now getting wbar in the middle of the screen standing vertically even though I use the command wbar -above-desk -bpress -pos bottom -nanim 7 I have just tried that command and it works fine on my

Re: Xorg totally unusable with KMS and new Xorg on Sandy Bridge system: how to undo

2013-02-08 Thread Thomas Mueller
Thomas Mueller writes: I built the newer Xorg and it falls flat: goes to a nongraphic screen that is blank except for a rectangular cursor in the upper left corner, and now I want to get back to the earlier Xorg. System is Intel Sandy Bridge with i7 CPU. Robert Huff responds:

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-02-08 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: FreeBSD Port: wbar-2.3.4 upgrade

2013-02-08 Thread Nicola Vitale
Hi, [2013/2/8 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu] wbar -above-desk -bpress -pos bottom -nanim 7 I've been playing around with the position settings. Have you already tried with the long options? wbar --above-desk --bpress --pos bottom --nanim 7? Best regards. -- Nicola Vitale -- Nicola

Re: Why the port build log file has terminal escape sequences?

2013-02-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 4 February 2013 05:24, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 02/03/2013 03:13, Chris Rees wrote: I guess this is a cmake/clang port? Cmake, clang and several other tools give colorised output. This is achieved with escape sequences. I understand about colorized output. But aren't such tools

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013 I don't think it's true. While still on 9.1 ports, the latest entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now) about NOV-2012. I believe the revision was also substantially lower.

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From glar...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 8 17:33:07 2013 On 2/8/13 10:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: From glar...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 8 14:54:13 2013 On 2/8/13 9:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: I just installed 9.1-release including the ports

mutt vs db44: Shared object libdb-4.4.so.0 not found, required by mutt

2013-02-08 Thread Raphael Eiselstein
Hi, there might be an issue with the mail/mutt port which interferes with the db44-* Port. In my build-jail (fbsd9.uugrn.org) I have db41, db42 and db44 due to some dependencies: [root@fbsd9 ~]# pkg_info | grep ^db4 db41-4.1.25_4 The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.1 db42-4.2.52_5

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013 I don't think it's true. While still on 9.1 ports, the latest entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now) about NOV-2012. I believe the revision was also substantially lower.

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread b.f.
On 2/8/13, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013 I don't think it's true. While still on 9.1 ports, the latest entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now) about NOV-2012. I believe the

Re: LibreOffice 3.6.5 on amd

2013-02-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote: Le 07/02/2013 ? 11:18:34+0100, Olivier Smedts a écrit 2013/2/6 Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote: 2013/2/6 Denny Lin

Re: LibreOffice 3.6.5 on amd

2013-02-08 Thread Albert Shih
Le 08/02/2013 ? 12:35:12-0800, Kevin Oberman a écrit On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote: complaints already. :-( On one of my pc everything compile, everything work but the registration don't work, the make install finish with : ===

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013 I don't think it's true. While still on 9.1 ports, the latest entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)

openssl broken

2013-02-08 Thread Jerry
I updated openssl on my system and ran into this bug: As noted numerous times on the openssl-dev list, OpenSSL 1.0.1d is broken. You need to grab http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=32cc247 and apply it to the 1.0.1d source to fix it. Will this patch be applied to the

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013 I don't think it's true. While still on 9.1 ports, the

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread b.f.
On 2/8/13, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013 I don't think

Re: Zimbra Port

2013-02-08 Thread Paul Pathiakis
Chris, I dug into it hard just a few days ago. Here's their issues: Like most people who are solely Linux (I'm not solely anything, 25+ years in sysadmin, architecture, internet engineering, etc.), they don't understand where /opt came from and what its true, original purpose was. 

Re: openssl broken

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Grimm
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: I updated openssl on my system and ran into this bug: As noted numerous times on the openssl-dev list, OpenSSL 1.0.1d is broken. You need to grab http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=32cc247 and apply it to the 1.0.1d source to fix

Re: how to move 9.1 ports to HEAD?

2013-02-08 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 21:00:33 2013 On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8

Re: x11/kde4-runtime

2013-02-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 February 2013 13:37, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: I have (had) /shells/bash-devel installed on my system. When updating KDE4, I discovered that the x11/kde4-runtime port and others that depend on shells/bash will not build if shell/bash-devel is installed. Presently, these ports are

Re: openssh-portable segmentation faults

2013-02-08 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-02-08 00:28, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:16:40AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... I guess a similar approach as take in the above thread should be taken, e.g. rename the function in the port to openbsd_strnvis(), and have the port call that. Or use macro

Re: x11/kde4-runtime

2013-02-08 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:19:34 + Chris Rees articulated: This is symptomatic of the dependency being of the form bash=version, rather than simply depending on the bash binary. Please would you provide a log? I can't find from a cursory search the exact port that depends on bash in this

Re: openssl broken

2013-02-08 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:03:07 + (UTC) Michael Grimm articulated: Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: I updated openssl on my system and ran into this bug: As noted numerous times on the openssl-dev list, OpenSSL 1.0.1d is broken. You need to grab

Re: openssl broken

2013-02-08 Thread Michael Grimm
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: Usually I never update any software to a new version until it has been in use for a while. However, since this was not a major update, but just a minor letter, I figured how badly could I get burnt. Hmm, I did follow the advice in my daly security report: |

Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?

2013-02-08 Thread Raphael Eiselstein
Hi again, quick-fix / works for me (line breaks!) -- [root@fbsd9 ~]# diff -u /usr/ports/mail/mutt/Makefile.orig /usr/ports/mail/mutt/Makefile --- /usr/ports/mail/mutt/Makefile.orig 2013-02-08 22:33:28.650075250 +0100 +++

Re: Zimbra Port

2013-02-08 Thread Jason Helfman
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Paul Pathiakis pathia...@yahoo.com wrote: Chris, I dug into it hard just a few days ago. Here's their issues: Like most people who are solely Linux (I'm not solely anything, 25+ years in sysadmin, architecture, internet engineering, etc.), they don't

Re: lang/perl5.16: threaded perl vs -pthread?

2013-02-08 Thread Steve Wills
On 02/08/13 20:59, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: What is the difference between building lang/perl5.16 with Build threaded perl vs Build with -pthread on amd64? What if I choose both options? The point of the -pthread option is to ensure that perl doesn't hang when you load

Re: LibreOffice 3.6.5 on amd

2013-02-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote: Le 08/02/2013 ? 12:35:12-0800, Kevin Oberman a écrit On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote: complaints already. :-( On one of my pc everything compile, everything work but the

Re: Zimbra Port

2013-02-08 Thread Paul Pathiakis
Gentlemen: I created an account on the Zimbra site and sent mail to the OSS Engineer, Solko, who has done most of the attempted post.  I hope to hear from him soon and get this kicked off. At the present time, I'm in the middle of performing the buildout of my infrastructure and products for

Re: Xorg totally unusable with KMS and new Xorg on Sandy Bridge system: how to undo

2013-02-08 Thread Thomas Mueller
From Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com: After adding those, graphics/libdrm must be rebuilt, and x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel must have the KMS option enabled and be rebuilt. If you just added WITH_NEW_XORG, there will be other xorg components that need to be updated. O no, I'm getting rid of