How to reintroduce/undelete port?

2014-03-15 Thread Ondra Knezour
Hello all, I use the sysutils/wait_on utility, which has been removed because (recurring) unavailability of the distfiles. I have missing file and I am willing to find some new sweet home for it on my machines, so the question is - how to request removal revocation via PR? -- Ondra Knezour

Re: How to reintroduce/undelete port?

2014-03-15 Thread John Marino
On 3/15/2014 09:02, Ondra Knezour wrote: Hello all, I use the sysutils/wait_on utility, which has been removed because (recurring) unavailability of the distfiles. I have missing file and I am willing to find some new sweet home for it on my machines, so the question is - how to request

Re: How to reintroduce/undelete port?

2014-03-15 Thread Ondra Knezour
Dne 15.3.2014 9:18, John Marino napsal(a): On 3/15/2014 09:02, Ondra Knezour wrote: I use the sysutils/wait_on utility, which has been removed because (recurring) unavailability of the distfiles. I have missing file and I am willing to find some new sweet home for it on my machines, so the

Re: How to reintroduce/undelete port?

2014-03-15 Thread Zsolt Udvari
We're using too and was a little discussion about replacement of wait_on: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-March/090762.html I hope wait_on will not deprecated :) 2014-03-15 9:02 GMT+01:00 Ondra Knezour knez...@weboutsourcing.cz: Hello all, I use the sysutils/wait_on

Re: How to reintroduce/undelete port?

2014-03-15 Thread Ondra Knezour
Dne 15.3.2014 10:00, Zsolt Udvari napsal(a): We're using too and was a little discussion about replacement of wait_on: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-March/090762.html I hope wait_on will not deprecated :) The port has been resurrected by rene@

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-03-15 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: How to reintroduce/undelete port?

2014-03-15 Thread Zsolt Udvari
Thanks all! 2014-03-15 10:06 GMT+01:00 Ondra Knezour knez...@weboutsourcing.cz: Dne 15.3.2014 10:00, Zsolt Udvari napsal(a): We're using too and was a little discussion about replacement of wait_on: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-March/090762.html I hope wait_on will

Re: Replacement for sysutils/wait_on

2014-03-15 Thread Zsolt Udvari
Good news: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-March/090798.html http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=348299 Zsolt 2014-03-13 23:26 GMT+01:00 Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it: Hello. I have a script which monitors a directory and wakes up as soon as a new

Re: KDE doesn't build on 10-STABLE, needs WITH_NEW_XORG

2014-03-15 Thread Koop Mast
On 10-3-2014 19:21, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Hi, Hi, I have a 10-stable system, and I am trying to rely as much on pkg as possible to install stuff so I don't need to build my own packages from ports. After the latest upgrade to KDE 4.12 in ports, KDE does not build out of the box. It turns

[QAT] 348313: 6x leftovers

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Update to 0.4.100.2.1 - Build ID: 20140315105200-30183 Job owner: t...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 48 minutes Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:40:28 GMT Revision: 348313

[CFT] switch default version of xorg on 10-STABLE

2014-03-15 Thread Niclas Zeising
This mail is cross-posted across several mailing lists. Please respect reply-to! It is time to switch FreeBSD 10-stable over to the new xorg distribution. The patch at [1] will do just that, for FreeBSD 10 versions after vt(9) was merged. It also contains fixes for USES=libtool, some minor

[QAT] 348314: 2x leftovers, 1x depend (makefile in x11-toolkits/gnustep-gui), 15x success

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
Add some missing distinfo With hat: portmgr - Build ID: 20140315114000-58712 Job owner: anto...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 38 minutes Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:17:44 GMT

Re: devel/libkolab failing to build on 11-current

2014-03-15 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org writes: Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com writes: devel/libkolab has been failing for the past few weeks. Log file from an 11-current/amd64 Poudriere build here: http://pastebin.com/kfjkMpE7 I was able to reproduce it here too. It's weird that no

Re: changes to base system DNS

2014-03-15 Thread Robert Huff
Warren Block writes: From dim memory of a couple of weeks ago... Making sure I understand: doing this (or the corrected version) will bring up named at the same point in the boot process as using system named in previous versions? Respectfully, Robert Huff

Re: net-im/prosody post install error

2014-03-15 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Ross Penner ro...@f-m.fm wrote: When I try to build prosody (on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3), I get the following error once it gets to the installation phase. The error references already having a prosody user and group. They were created the first time I tried to

[QAT] 348336: 2x leftovers, 4x success

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Convert USE_GMAKE to USES - Build ID: 20140315154600-43425 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 22 minutes Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:07:57 GMT Revision: 348336

[QAT] 348339: 2x leftovers, 4x success

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Convert USE_BZIP/GMAKE to USES - While here add stage support - Build ID: 20140315162000-55043 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 23 minutes Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:42:30 GMT

[QAT] 348328: 6x leftovers

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
Add a patch sent upstream to fix the build with clang 3.4. clang 3.4 is pickier with the flags it accepts, and refuses to work with the GCC-specific -fno-check-new. - Build ID: 20140315143800-54137 Job owner:

[QAT] 348342: 4x ignored: is marked as broken: fails to build with new utmpx, 6x leftovers, 26x success

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Convert USE_GMAKE to USES - Build ID: 20140315162200-41820 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 68 minutes Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:29:34 GMT Revision: 348342

[QAT] 348343: 4x leftovers, 2x clang, 18x success, 6x ignored: is marked as broken: fails to configure

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Convert USE_XZ/BZIP2/GMAKE to USES - Build ID: 20140315162601-43444 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 81 minutes Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:46:58 GMT Revision:

Re: [games/traingame] Build failures with FreeBSD 10

2014-03-15 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:31:43 +0100 Rusmir Dusko wrote: Hello Trainm Game not build more in FreeBSD 10. With FreeBSD 9.1, 9.2 have all good worked. 10.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Tue Jan 14 20:48:07 UTC 2014 amd64 This is first Cmake and then GCC Port. Have too not

Re: [games/traingame] Build failures with FreeBSD 10

2014-03-15 Thread Rusmir Dusko
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 19:23:12 +0100 Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:31:43 +0100 Rusmir Dusko wrote: Hello Trainm Game not build more in FreeBSD 10. With FreeBSD 9.1, 9.2 have all good worked. 10.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Tue Jan 14

[QAT] 348347: 26x leftovers, 2x clang, 38x success

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Convert USE_GMAKE/BZIP2 to USES - Build ID: 20140315163400-60441 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 3 hours Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 19:44:02 GMT Revision: 348347

Re: changes to base system DNS

2014-03-15 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Robert Huff wrote: Warren Block writes: From dim memory of a couple of weeks ago... Making sure I understand: doing this (or the corrected version) will bring up named at the same point in the boot process as using system named in previous versions? It looks and

[QAT] 348341: 2x leftovers, 6x ignored: is marked as broken: doesn't build, 4x success

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Convert USE_BZIP/GMAKE to USES - Build ID: 20140315162001-15843 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 4 hours Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:00:25 GMT Revision: 348341

Re: changes to base system DNS

2014-03-15 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Robert Huff wrote: Warren Block writes: From dim memory of a couple of weeks ago... Making sure I understand: doing this (or the corrected version) will bring up named at the same point in

[QAT] 348376: 6x leftovers

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Fixes resourceleak in i3bar and memoryleak in i3 - Convert to USES=tar:bzip2 PR: ports/187617 Submitted by: Johannes Jost Meixner x...@chaot.net Obtained from: i3 git (http://code.stapelberg.de/git/i3/) -

Re: Requesting Committer Attention for ports/184011

2014-03-15 Thread Ryan Frederick
I'd like to bump this since it's been just shy of a month. I'm now the maintainer of net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports, and I'd like to get this update committed as part of supporting pkgng in the port in addition to reviving upstream development. Ryan On 2/16/14, 8:08 PM, Ryan Frederick wrote: I'd

[QAT] 348350: 1x depend (linker_error in textproc/libextractor), 3x depend (ignored: is marked as broken: does not package in textproc/libextractor), 38x success, 2x assumes_gcc, 10x leftovers

2014-03-15 Thread Ports-QAT
- Convert USE_GMAKE/BZIP2 to USES - Build ID: 20140315164200-64394 Job owner: m...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 5 hours Enddate: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:44:00 GMT Revision: 348350

Re: Requesting Committer Attention for ports/184011

2014-03-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/03/2014 21:33, Ryan Frederick wrote: I'd like to bump this since it's been just shy of a month. I'm now the maintainer of net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports, and I'd like to get this update committed as part of supporting pkgng in the port in addition to reviving upstream development. Hi,

Re: Requesting Committer Attention for ports/184011

2014-03-15 Thread Ryan Frederick
On 3/15/14, 5:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: Hi, Ryan, I'll deal with this for you. However, I can't commit the patch from the PR as it stands, as it doesn't have staging support. That's absolutely required nowadays. It might be an idea to make the pkg_version/portaudit vs. pkg

Re: Requesting Committer Attention for ports/184011

2014-03-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/03/2014 22:28, Ryan Frederick wrote: I'd appreciate your help Matthew. I don't intend this patch to be an end-all and be-all commit but rather a stopgap commit as part of transitioning to a fork I've made of the original upstream (https://github.com/rfrederick/check_ports). The original

Re: Requesting Committer Attention for ports/184011

2014-03-15 Thread Ryan Frederick
On 3/15/14, 6:26 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 15/03/2014 22:28, Ryan Frederick wrote: I'd appreciate your help Matthew. I don't intend this patch to be an end-all and be-all commit but rather a stopgap commit as part of transitioning to a fork I've made of the original upstream

mail/mutt doesn't compile

2014-03-15 Thread Larry Rosenman
Updated my ports tree, and get the following: Script started on Sat Mar 15 19:26:42 2014 borg.lerctr.org /usr/ports # portmaster mail/mautt ]0;portmaster: mutt-1.5.22 === Currently installed version: mutt-1.5.22 === Port directory: /usr/ports/mail/mutt === Gathering distinfo list for