On 24/10/2016 03:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
scratch65...@att.net wrote:
For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially
deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up
that there's potentially something unsavory about it.
Snap ! Seconded :-)
Same as my Mon, 24 Oct
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Baho Utot
> wrote:
>
>> Sending this again as I have had mail server issues
>>
>> There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am
>>
>>
>>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi ,friend ,
Nice to email to you , this is Pauline from China .
We are the manufacturer of CWDM/DWDM Mux Module and SFP module.
1X2-18CH CWDM MUX/DEMUX . $13/per channel . ABS/LGX box and 19inch 1U rack
Type.
Here are 1*16ch CWDM MUX picture for reference.
If there
> Why can't we accept that a program which may be well over 30 years old,
> hasn't seen any update since 20 years, is more or less lost since some
> time and has no technical value (it's just some parody of a text filter)
> can be removed from the tree? Anyone who needs this port can install it
>
Hi!
> > that makes them look like a bunch of out-of-touch clueless old white
> > guys;
>
> Inflamatory language degrades, Mature language builds.
In a mail thread about jive that finding is very mature 8-}
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially
> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up
> that there's potentially something unsavory about it.
Snap ! Seconded :-)
Same as my Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:05:52 +0200
SENSITIVE=
but
Hi, Reference:
> From: Mark Linimon
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:11:07 -0500
Mark Linimon wrote Henk van Oers :
> Thank you for your very nice troll.
>
> I was going to work on some FreeBSD stuff today but now I think
> I'll find
> Beside any discussion on wether or not misc/jives was offensive, note that =
> there
> is actually no upstream and no public distfile left for this port, this is =
> also
> a reason for it to be nuked.
I have a distfile (as obviously do various others who have similarly just
compiled for first
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 01:31:04PM +0200, Alphons van Werven wrote:
> > I'm still half waiting for someone with misguided delusions of moral
> > superiority to delete that port, thinking it's their decision to make
> > that FreeBSD must not enable people to display their
## Mikhail T. (mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com):
> > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency.
> If it was "decent" in 1997, when obrien added it, it must still be
> decent today, only 19 years later. Nothing has changed about "decency"
> since then.
Oh, it has changed. And it
On 22.10.2016 Mark Linimon wrote:
It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency.
If it was "decent" in 1997, when obrien added it, it must still be
decent today, only 19 years later. Nothing has changed about "decency"
since then.
juvenile junk that makes them look like a
Rod Person wrote:
anything that can used to create text or graphics can be used to promote
hatred, discrimination or violence
"can used to" != "promotes" && "recursive logic" != "logic. Surely
there are better arguments against deprecating jive.
If PyCon can implement a Code of Conduct
[Default] On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:32:00 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch
wrote:
>
>> Am 23.10.2016 um 20:00 schrieb scratch65...@att.net:
>>
>> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially
>> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up
>> that
[Default] On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:30:05 +0200, Matthias Apitz
wrote:
>El día Sunday, October 23, 2016 a las 02:13:12PM -0400, scratch65...@att.net
>escribió:
>
>> I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be
>> part of the social world make themselves the tools
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:15:34PM +0200, Piotr Szafarczyk wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tell me where / how to diagnose the error please.
>
> I have got a system upgraded from 10.1. Problems started with rebuilding
> ports depending on perl. bin/perl5 and bin/perl5.20.3 were missing. It looks
> like
> Am 23.10.2016 um 20:00 schrieb scratch65...@att.net:
>
> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially
> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up
> that there's potentially something unsavory about it.
As others have already said, it is unlikely that we could
El día Sunday, October 23, 2016 a las 02:13:12PM -0400, scratch65...@att.net
escribió:
> I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be
> part of the social world make themselves the tools of
> psychopaths. Then we have, as the mordant joke goes, the program
> nuke_germany being
Hi All,
Tell me where / how to diagnose the error please.
I have got a system upgraded from 10.1. Problems started with rebuilding
ports depending on perl. bin/perl5 and bin/perl5.20.3 were missing. It
looks like port building does not create links (after perl the same was
with postfix,
I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be
part of the social world make themselves the tools of
psychopaths. Then we have, as the mordant joke goes, the program
nuke_germany being objected to not on humanitarian grounds, but
because the program should be nuke_country with the
For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially
deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up
that there's potentially something unsavory about it.
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis
wrote:
>Louis Epstein wrote:
>> You really
Thank you for your very nice troll.
I was going to work on some FreeBSD stuff today but now I think
I'll find something better to do.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Alphons van Werven wrote:
> Louis Epstein wrote:
>
> > In any event,portmaster -a -i updates now abort because misc/jive is
> > detected on my system.
> >
> > This goes beyond "We will no longer provide this application" to
> > "we will no longer let you upgrade your
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 16:51:12 +0200 (CEST)
Henk van Oers wrote:
>
> A sword is a bladed weapon intended for slashing or thrusting.
>
> And also: "Framework for manipulating Bible texts"
>
> Is that what misc/jive does?
>
> You can not kill with a jive
> but you can kill
Dave Horsfall wrote:
>> There used to be "offensive" (a term to be taken rather loosely in this
>> case) fortune cookies, but they got kicked out somewhere in 9.X. That
>> was the base system though; not the ports tree.
>
> Not to mention "fortune -o" (to get the obscene versions) and there
Louis Epstein wrote:
> In any event,portmaster -a -i updates now abort because misc/jive is
> detected on my system.
>
> This goes beyond "We will no longer provide this application" to
> "we will no longer let you upgrade your applications as long as you
> have this one installed".
To be fair,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:22:53PM +0200, Henk van Oers wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> [ software that hurts _me_ ]
> > Come on, isn't there some PR to work on 8-} ?
>
> Yes, restore misc/jive.
>
Beside any discussion on wether or not misc/jives was offensive, note that
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Baho Utot
wrote:
> Sending this again as I have had mail server issues
>
> There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am
>
>
> /usr/ports/math/libqalculate # make
> ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user
> ===> Found saved
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
[ software that hurts _me_ ]
Come on, isn't there some PR to work on 8-} ?
Yes, restore misc/jive.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:14:20PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Chris H wrote:
> >>
> >> I actually was puzzled with texlive not installing and remembered
> >> seeing someone had issues with the new collate stuff. I simply
> >> tried
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:41:10AM -0700, Roger Marquis wrote:
> Louis Epstein wrote:
> > You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use.
>
> The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on their
> own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Chris H wrote:
>>
>> I actually was puzzled with texlive not installing and remembered
>> seeing someone had issues with the new collate stuff. I simply
>> tried the latter setting with a "Let's see what happens". It worked.
>>
>> Moral 1
Hi!
> A sword is a bladed weapon intended for slashing or thrusting.
To quote the pkg-descr:
The SWORD Project is the CrossWire Bible Society's free Bible
software project. Its purpose is to create cross-platform open-source
tools, covered by the GNU General Public License, that allow
I think, we should end this thread. The port was removed, sure with good
reasons. If someone wants to use it. he can pull out from svn the old port
and continue with it to maintain.
matthias
--
Sent from my Ubuntu phone
http://www.unixarea.de/
Hi!
> Is this -- being more inclusive (whatever that means) --
> even a valid goal for a technical project?
That depends on those working on the project. If they wonder
why systems programming is so one-sided when it cames to age,
gender, race, etc, then: yes, it becomes a goal.
Please
Hi!
> Who exactly was offended by the existence of misc/jive in ports? Were
> there any actual complaints? How many?
One, in August. portmgr had a look at the port and decided on the removal.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
A sword is a bladed weapon intended for slashing or thrusting.
And also: "Framework for manipulating Bible texts"
Is that what misc/jive does?
You can not kill with a jive
but you can kill with manipulating bible texts.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Roger Marquis wrote:
> Louis Epstein wrote:
> > You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people
> > use.
>
> The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on
> their own outside of the ports tree.
Louis Epstein wrote:
You really need to have a hands-off policy on what software people use.
The meaning of this is unclear as anyone can still compile jive on their
own outside of the ports tree. WRT ports, they should be subject to the
same policies as base.
The meta questions here are: A)
Hi,
Who exactly was offended by the existence of misc/jive in ports? Were
there any actual complaints? How many?
Regards,
--
Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.
After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.
Marko Cupać
https://www.mimar.rs/
Sending this again as I have had mail server issues
There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am
/usr/ports/math/libqalculate # make
===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user
===> Found saved configuration for libqalculate-0.9.10
===> libqalculate-0.9.10 depends on file:
41 matches
Mail list logo