On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:23:56PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
> I think you might have been better off going with the suggested
> cd /offending/port
> make deinstall
> make reinstall
>
> The choice to pollute your environment with FORCE_PKG_REGISTER
> will simply compound the problem you're already
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 21:12:28 -0800 "bob prohaska" said
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:32:53PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> Stale ports SHOULD not be an issue. Normally old ports are updated
> automatically. It is important that your ports tree is consistent and,
> usually
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:32:53PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> Stale ports SHOULD not be an issue. Normally old ports are updated
> automatically. It is important that your ports tree is consistent and,
> usually that it is current. Assuming yours is, the only issue is the
> oddball case like
[Dumb typo in my } placements.]
On 2017-Nov-22, at 8:36 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> As evidence only two lines of jail.sh reference SRCPATH
> other than where -S assigns to it:
>
> # grep "SRCPATH" /usr/local/share/poudriere/jail.sh
> [ -z "${SRCPATH}" ] && DISTS="${DISTS} src"
> [
As evidence only two lines of jail.sh reference SRCPATH
other than where -S assigns to it:
# grep "SRCPATH" /usr/local/share/poudriere/jail.sh
[ -z "${SRCPATH}" ] && DISTS="${DISTS} src"
[ -n "$SRCPATH" ] && jset ${JAILNAME} srcpath ${SRCPATH}
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:12:16PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:28 PM, bob prohaska
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Attempts to compile a number of ports on RPI2, in this case
>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:12:16PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:28 PM, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> >
> > Attempts to compile a number of ports on RPI2, in this case dns/bind910,
> > often
> > stop with an error along the lines of:
> >
> > /bin/mkdir -p
On 11/22/17 16:43, Chris H wrote:
Maybe I'm just missing something... But doesn't
$ make plist
give it to you?
Apologies if I'm simply missing the obvious. :)
$ make makeplist
doesn't know which files depend on which options.
Yuri
___
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Mathieu Demers via freebsd-ports <
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to build Firefox57 for 3 days but I had always the same error
> when it is building.
>
> There are the infos:
>
> FreeBSD Laptop-Mathieu 11.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:28 PM, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> Attempts to compile a number of ports on RPI2, in this case dns/bind910,
> often
> stop with an error along the lines of:
>
> /bin/mkdir -p '/tmp/mountpoint.f1jbPw/devel/gettext-tools/work/stage/usr/
>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Demers via freebsd-ports <
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to upgrade Thunderbird, but I always have an error when it is
> building. I tried more than one time, but it is always happen.
>
> There are my infos:
>
> FreeBSD Laptop-Mathieu
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 21:04:22 -0800 said
While trying to update math/vtk, I found that its plist is very complex,
with many optional files, some files depending on multiple port options.
But it is a well-behaved project, and it only installs the correct file
set. It is much
Mark Millard wrote:
> [Plain "make" works (no -j ).]
>
> Is it expected that -j1 and the like get what I report below?
A bug in the makefile (eg conflict b/w .ORDER and dependencies)
will result in that sort of noise.
-j1 is still jobs mode
Attempts to compile a number of ports on RPI2, in this case dns/bind910, often
stop with an error along the lines of:
/bin/mkdir -p
'/tmp/mountpoint.f1jbPw/devel/gettext-tools/work/stage/usr/local/share/gettext'
install -m 555 ../build-aux/config.rpath
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:15:59AM +1100, Trev wrote:
> bob prohaska wrote on 23/11/2017 04:36:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > some ten minutes later, the ssh connections are still working.
> >
After some three hours, the ssh connections all failed, merely saying
"connection closed". The host remained up
Whenever I have build errors first thing I try is to build with default
options (e.g. using a clean setting environment in poudriere). Very
often it succeeds, which means that the problem is in some of the option
I have set for Firefox or one of its dependencies. Does it build with
default
[Plain "make" works (no -j ).]
Is it expected that -j1 and the like get what I report below?
(Other oddities with -j usage for port builds have been
noted on an rpi2.)
In /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg :
( WRKDIRPREFIX?=/wrkdirs )
# make -j30
--- check-license ---
===> License BSD2CLAUSE accepted
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:15:05PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> But I've another oddity that you might try:
>
> A) I booted and ran top on the serial console ( top -CaePosize )
> B) I logged in 4 ssh sessions and had each do "openssl speed"
>
> top gets an unexpected result: CPU 2 shows as
Le mer. 22 nov. 17 à 17:59:39 +0100, Brooks Davis
écrivait :
> Looking to the future, is the port an obviously candidate for FLAVORS or
> multi-packages? If so, they you probably want to keep the current
> plist. If not, then I guess it depends on your confidence that the
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:04:22PM -0800, Yuri wrote:
> While trying to update math/vtk, I found that its plist is very complex,
> with many optional files, some files depending on multiple port options.
>
> But it is a well-behaved project, and it only installs the correct file
> set. It is
Hi Kurt,
> On 22. Nov 2017, at 3:49 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Done.
Many thanks! :)
Cheers,
Franco
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Hi!
> Looking for a kind committer for these two issues:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218487
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222988
Done.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Hi,
Looking for a kind committer for these two issues:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218487
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222988
Thanks,
Franco
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
24 matches
Mail list logo