Re: Avoiding "make clean" when changing pkg-plist and other files?

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:02:35 -0700 "Kirk Coombs" said Hello, I’m working on building my very first port (for the server component from https://www.urbackup.org/ ). Since this my first attempt at porting, I have ended up iterating a lot

Re: All those notes...

Thanks, all; I've made a note to myself on my Mac's calendar to use script/tee (something I always think of *after* the event, and on the Mac as well). Some random observations: Why would /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf need to be removed if not needed? Surely as I've just upgraded it, I

Re: Avoiding "make clean" when changing pkg-plist and other files?

That did it. Thanks! Kirk > On Jan 7, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Danilo Egêa Gondolfo wrote: > > make restage > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Kirk Coombs > wrote: > Hello, > > I’m working on building my

Re: Avoiding "make clean" when changing pkg-plist and other files?

make restage On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Kirk Coombs wrote: > Hello, > > I’m working on building my very first port (for the server component from > https://www.urbackup.org/ ). Since this my > first attempt at porting, I have ended

Avoiding "make clean" when changing pkg-plist and other files?

Hello, I’m working on building my very first port (for the server component from https://www.urbackup.org/ ). Since this my first attempt at porting, I have ended up iterating a lot on the pkg-plist, new files in the ‘files’ directory, etc. as I try new things and

Re: All those notes...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:39:56 +1100 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 8 January 2018 at 8:48:04 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > I'm not quite sure what happened since my last weekly "pkg update" > > etc but it sure got

Re: All those notes...

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > This was accompanied by zillions of notes, warning me to "do this" and > > "avoid doing that" etc. Err, were those notes squirreled away somewhere, > > or do I have to hope that I don't lose the window and its

Re: All those notes...

On Monday, 8 January 2018 at 8:48:04 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > I'm not quite sure what happened since my last weekly "pkg update" etc but > it sure got busy: > > Checking for upgrades (198 candidates): 100% > Processing candidates (198 candidates): 100% > The following 110

All those notes...

I'm not quite sure what happened since my last weekly "pkg update" etc but it sure got busy: Checking for upgrades (198 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (198 candidates): 100% The following 110 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED:

Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

08.01.2018 4:00, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > PRs are false alibi. Some of my PRs are open for more than 10 years. So were mine when I could not commit fixes myself. This is not excuse to be lazy and not make another one. > For all erroneous port there must be will on maintainer and committer

Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

Eugene Grosbein wrote on 2018/01/07 21:47: 08.01.2018 3:36, Miroslav Lachman wrote: There IS consensus on modifying config files while upgrade and it is written in our Porter's Handbook: only unmodified files may be changes with upgrade. Any other behaviour is a bug that should be fixed.

Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

08.01.2018 3:36, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> There IS consensus on modifying config files while upgrade and it is written >> in our Porter's Handbook: >> only unmodified files may be changes with upgrade. Any other behaviour is a >> bug that should be fixed. > > If it is that simple then tell

Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

Eugene Grosbein wrote on 2018/01/07 17:18: 07.01.2018 22:10, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I am following 11-STABLE and therefore upgrading my system quite frequently. During that process I do recompile all ports installed by poudriere and upgrade all ports after reboot. There are no consensus

Re: py27 ports always show "new version available"

On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 04:23:08AM +, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > Are your portmaster outputting the following message? > > make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 1067: FLAVOR may not be > passed empty as a make argument. > > When I tried portmaster -i cmake, portmaster always tries

Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > There are no consensus about what services should do on deinstall or > upgrade. That's why there is such a mess in ports / packages. > Some did nothing (my preferred way), some stop (but did not start) the > service,

Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

07.01.2018 22:10, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> I am following 11-STABLE and therefore upgrading my system quite frequently. >> During that process I do recompile all ports installed by poudriere and >> upgrade all ports after reboot. > There are no consensus about what services should do on

Re: A note on updating security/gnupg20 -> gnupg

On 7 Jan, 2018, at 7:33, David Wolfskill wrote: I had been using security/gnupg20 with mail/mutt, based on a misunderstanding on my part (back when the security/gnupg20 port was created). Now that security/gnupg20 has been expired and removed, I had motivation to look

Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

Michael Grimm wrote on 2018/01/07 15:31: Hi, I am following 11-STABLE and therefore upgrading my system quite frequently. During that process I do recompile all ports installed by poudriere and upgrade all ports after reboot. Today I stumbled over an IMHO weird behaviour of the

Re: qt5-qmake failed update

Walter Schwarzenfeld writes: > Another different error: > > ===>  Patching for qt5-multimedia-5.9.3 > ===>  Applying extra patch > /usr/ports/multimedia/qt5-multimedia/files/extrapatch-no-gstreamer > No such line 17 in input file, ignoring > 1 out of 1 hunks

Re: qt5-qmake failed update

Walter Schwarzenfeld writes: > with > > ===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for qt5-qmake-5.9.3 > /usr/bin/sed -i "" -e "/DEFAULT_LIBDIRS=/ s,\"n,n/usr/local/lib&," > /ram/usr/ports/devel/qt5-qmake/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.9.3/configure > ===>  

A note on updating security/gnupg20 -> gnupg

I had been using security/gnupg20 with mail/mutt, based on a misunderstanding on my part (back when the security/gnupg20 port was created). Now that security/gnupg20 has been expired and removed, I had motivation to look into the situation in more detail; I found that security/gnupg (now at

'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd

Hi, I am following 11-STABLE and therefore upgrading my system quite frequently. During that process I do recompile all ports installed by poudriere and upgrade all ports after reboot. Today I stumbled over an IMHO weird behaviour of the spamassassin's installation process, that stops a

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: qt5-qmake failed update

Could be solved with set |GSTREAMER=on| or remove files/extrapatch-no-gstreamer and this line in the Makefile GSTREAMER_EXTRA_PATCHES_OFF= ${FILESDIR}/extrapatch-no-gstreamer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list