On 2012.05.28. 18:16, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 5/28/12 10:11 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
How about if I add lines like this:
.if !defined(IGNORE_SECURITY_RISK)
IGNORE= has a security risk because it downloads a file \
without a checksum. Define IGNORE_SECURITY_RISK to
David O'Brien escribió:
I need to get shells/bash repocopied before I can commit this.
But I wanted to let folks play with the upgrade if they wanted to.
I suggest using single distfile for both ones. I see that using this
PATCHLEVEL method seems easier to handle when updating, but the other
Andriy Gapon escribió:
on 20/10/2008 17:14 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I try to install archivers/rar on amd64 system without 32-bit userland
(NO_LIB32) but with 32-bit support in kernel (COMPAT_IA32) and I get the
following error:
** Port marked as IGNORE: archivers/rar:
Yoshihiro Ota escribió:
Hello, forks.
There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following.
% ls -d */*tomcat*
java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41
www/jakarta-tomcat4 www/tomcat55
www/jakarta-tomcat5 www/tomcat6
www/tomcat-native
When I diffed ver. 5
Dominic Fandrey escribió:
I have created a port of Bartosz Fabianowski's Wacom driver.
Since nobody has stepped forward to commit it, I thought I'd
inform this list, so that people can test it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128547
I suggest that you should consult with [EMAIL
Palle Girgensohn escribió:
I submitted a patch yesterday the I think fixes this problem. Please
try upgrading, and if it still doesn't work, email me again.
I had another problem with 8.3. After installing, initdb couldn't create
a new database. I needed to get a PostgreSQL server installed
Chuck Swiger escribió:
I'd just updated the BSD grep port to bsd-grep-20080725_1, but
regrettably have noticed that many things using grep stopped working.
For example, running GNU-style ./configure hangs here:
configure: creating ./config.status
load: 1.15 cmd: sh 72964 [runnable]
As I discussed with Kai, I just added a port to make the testing of this
cool new stuff easier. Enjoy!
Regards,
--
Gabor Kovesdan
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.kovesdan.org
---BeginMessage---
gabor 2008-01-18 23:11:34 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to
go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem.
My
Hi folks,
sometimes good ideas come later, so please wait a bit with making your
ports DESTDIR-aware. Kris had a very interesting suggestion. I wonder
how we haven't thought of this so far. This needs a bit more of
discussion, though, but if we can work this out a bit better, things
will
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I'm now exploring new DESTDIR-related stuff, and I find it far from
being useable. More of that, DESTDIR-related changes seem dangerous
to me.
As far as I understand, for port to support DESTDIR, it's files
should be installed into ${DESTDIR}/${PREFIX}/foo (aka
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
What I propose is:
- Change variable naming scheme.
All *BASE and *DIR vars should be reverted to their original meanings
(i.e. local paths). Instead, INSTALL_ vars should be introduced:
INSTALL_LOCALBASE=${DESTDIR}/${LOCALBASE}
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:25:38PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006:
Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate in all ports is not
the two separate words (CHROOT DESTDIR), but that you have to test
defined(DESTDIR)
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:08:09PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports
infrastructure DESTDIR support today. Note that this support is only for
the infrastructure, ports may or may not respect the DESTDIR
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:49:11AM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:08:09PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports
infrastructure DESTDIR support
Hi,
I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports
infrastructure DESTDIR support today. Note that this support is only for
the infrastructure, ports may or may not respect the DESTDIR macro, so
you should use this with care. Also note, that we only tested this
patchset
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger
20 matches
Mail list logo
