Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

2021-03-26 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:55:33 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, George Mitchell wrote: > > >> [...] it is really not for everybody to use overlays in current > >> state (overlays are poor documented at least). [...] > > > > Until this thread I had never heard of them.

Re: bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:39:13 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > BTW, there is no documentation as what 'pkg bootstrap -f' > does. In particular, the -f option is no described. > >From pkg(8) (in 12.2): bootstrap This is for compatibility with the pkg(7) bootstrapper. If

Re: portsnap

2020-12-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:02:55 -0700 Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: > portsnap is a shell script where fetch is used for downloads. It uses fetch for some things, but fetching the actual updates uses phttpget(8) which supports pipelined HTTP requests.

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:43:28 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/08/2020 07:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > > I usually run `pkg version` to see what packages have changed. > > > > Previously, that was a more or less instant operation, now it takes > > over 100 seconds. The problem is that

Re: cad/gmsh port

2020-03-13 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:19:20 + Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > For some reason fetch freezes when the ports tries to build cad/gmsh. > But if I download the tarball via my web browser, it works. It also happens with wget and curl. What's particularly odd is that fetch took 2 hours to

Re: Aria2 and magnets

2020-03-05 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:19:06 -0700 @lbutlr wrote: > Brand new install of aria2 and I tried to grab the FreBSD 12.1 amd64 > image via a magnet link: ... > After about 30 minutes the only thing I get is updates showing 0 > Bytes downloaded. ... > > Downloading a torrent file, in this case Ubuntu

Re: good gui bit-torrent client?

2020-02-29 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:49:02 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: > I used to use azureus/vuze, but it hasn't been maintained is > quite a while. I used azureus a long time ago, and liked it, but IIRC at the time it didn't scale very well when managing many torrents and its java dependencies were a

Re: MariaDB 10.3.17

2019-08-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 13:00:52 -0600 The Doctor wrote: > MariaDB 10.3.17 is out? > > Who is supposed to be looking after this port? > cd /usr/ports// make maintainer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Spamassassin/GeoIP2

2019-03-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 16:52:01 +0100 Xavier wrote: > Hello, > > Since GeoIP is deprecated, I installed GeoIP2 instead. > > Now, sa-update fails with> plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): > Bareword "GEOIP_MEMORY_CACHE"... GeoIP2 does require extra configuration. You need to download a

nvidia-driver failed after 11.1 to 11.2 update

2018-10-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
I recently updated from 11.1 to 11.2 and the nvidia-driver failed to initialize afterwards. Switching from 'quarterly' to 'latest' didn't help, but reinstalling from the port fixed it. Perhaps the 'latest' version needs to be rebuilt against a newer kernel, or have I done something strange?

Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster

2018-09-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, the wise Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > This discussion of portmaster prompts me to ask, what is the status > > of portupgrade? > > > > I used portupgrade at first but subsequently switched to > > portmaster.

Re: Cannot specify ntpd binary in ports with ntpd startup file.

2018-08-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > 1) Got the version wrong. I'm on 10.4. > > 2) Forgot a subject. Whoops. > > 3) Forgot to cc maintainer. Doh! > > -Dan > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > Funny question. I'm on

Re: portsnap not honoring WORKDIR and PORTSDIR?

2018-04-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 16:49:13 -0600 Gary Aitken wrote: > Is portsnap supposed to honor WORKDIR and PORTSDIR? > > These are defined in /etc/portsnap.conf, and it's not clear to me > whether they are honored only via the .conf file or whether they > are supposed to be honored from the environment

Re: Suggesting new virtual categories: physics and chemistry

2017-12-14 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:47:38 -0800 Yuri wrote: > Some ports naturally fall under these categories: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13481 Science isn't particularly large: $ for d in `make -V SUBDIR` ;do echo "`find $d/ -maxdepth 1 -type d |wc -l` $d" ;done |sort -n | tail -n 30

Re: Flavor part of package origin?

2017-12-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:38:59 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 11/12/2017 à 10:12, Stefan Esser a écrit : > > $ pkg info -o '*setuptools*' > > py27-setuptools-36.5.0 devel/py-setuptools@py27 > > py36-setuptools-36.5.0 devel/py-setuptools@py36 > > > I really do not like the look

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

2017-12-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Strongly agree! Support ofr some basics like .forward is really a > requirement. It is used for too many "normal" mail operations > including private dropmail or procmail setups as well as forwarding > to a smartmail system. This is

Re: Bogofilter contrib scripts treated as docs

2017-11-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:12:48 +0100 Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 06.11.2017 um 20:19 schrieb RW: > > > > I just noticed that the bogofilter perl and shell scripts from the > > contrib directory (see below) only get installed if bogofilter is > > built with the DOCS o

Bogofilter contrib scripts treated as docs

2017-11-06 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
I just noticed that the bogofilter perl and shell scripts from the contrib directory (see below) only get installed if bogofilter is built with the DOCS option. .for i in bfproxy.pl bogofilter-milter.pl bogo.R bogofilter-qfe.sh \ mime.get.rfc822.pl parmtest.sh printmaildir.pl \

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-10-01 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 20:53:29 +0200 Vlad K. wrote: > On 2017-10-01 18:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > > Do you mean as opposed to installing the dependencies from the > > repository, or are you saying that it rebuilds them? > > Poudriere builds isolated

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-10-01 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 12:26:25 +0200 Vlad K. wrote: > Another problem is poudriere's inability to reuse already installed > packages, if they're a dependency for something being built by it. > Personally I'd never use that option, as I want clean, isolated > rebuilds of everything affected, but I

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:34:11 + Carmel NY wrote: > I have just the opposite experience. With "portupgrade" I was getting > all too many dependencies installed that I had no use for. I > personally appreciate synth's finer-grain installation philosophy. But presumably that's just portupgrade

Re: Synth and circular dependencies

2017-08-22 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:34:15 + Thomas Mueller wrote: > It was very disconcerting when I would do a massive portupgrade > before going to bed and subsequently find portupgrade stopped for an > options dialog. FWIW portupgrade has a -c option to avoid that.

Re: Synth and circular dependencies

2017-08-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:19:24 + Thomas Mueller wrote: > But on this computer, no such system crashes, but I ran into circular > dependencies Try removing any port options that aren't absolutely essential. > It seems the ports go overboard with an awful lot of dependencies, of > which not

Re: Question on Amavis and ramdisk

2017-08-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:47:43 +0200 Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > In the amavis rc.d file is noted: > "" > "WARNING: using ramdisk is reported to be unstable and" > "thus it is highly recommended to be turned off." >

Re: pkg and packages

2017-05-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 8 May 2017 09:29:47 -0700 Freddie Cash wrote: > ​Samba + GVFS + Thunar doesn't make your FreeBSD filesystems > available from Windows machines. It makes your Windows file shares > available on FreeBSD, and they show up in Thunar just like other > folders. GVFS uses libsmbclient and/or

Re: pkg and packages

2017-05-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 04 May 2017 07:43:30 -0600 Jim Trigg wrote: > ISTR that it's Thunar that depends on Samba by default. Yes it looks like it came in when Thunar defaulted to depending on the "Trash Panel Applet Plugin". Unfortunately the options framework caches old defaults.

Re: pkg and packages

2017-05-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 04 May 2017 08:09:47 -0400 scratch65...@att.net wrote: > > I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and samba > that the xfce desktop would need, particularly since the desktop > is very simple, and also because I've never got samba > functionality for free after installing

Re: portmaster installation trampling on my binary packages???

2017-03-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:57:48 + Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > I'm not sure I understand. Are "latest" and "quarterly" ports trees? > The default packages for releases are built from a series of branches of the main ports tree that are made split-off every three months, and then just get

Re: portmaster installation trampling on my binary packages???

2017-03-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:35:26 + Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > Hi. I'm quite new to FreeBSD. I'm getting a system up & running > slowly, working around my chronic fatigue. Today I'm updating for the > first time. Base system and pkg update appeared to go well. I haven't > rebooted, wanting to

Re: spamassassin does not list all required packages (3.4.1_9)

2017-02-25 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 00:06:56 + RW wrote: > I'm not seeing these errors, but I'm guessing that they are caused by > the OP using an internationalized domain name somewhere in the SA > configuration. Most likely the name of server that spamd runs on. Or maybe an accidental non-ascii

Re: spamassassin does not list all required packages (3.4.1_9)

2017-02-25 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:34:54 -0800 Chris H wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:50:50 -0500 (EST) "Igor R." > wrote > > > Hello! > > > > As far as I can tell, spamassassin-3.4.1_9 does not list all > > required p5 packages, which results in 3 error messages > > in

Re: Do I need /var/db/portsnap/distfiles and /usr/port/distfiles?

2017-02-16 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:32:17 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > There is only the one FreeBSD box in my stable, hence I don't need to > build packages for others. It's to to do with whether you use ports, rather than if you build package for other boxes. > It's a somewhat minimalist box

Re: Port management tools (was: Status of synth)

2017-02-16 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:19:24 -0500 George Mitchell wrote: > > Yeah, I really like this a lot more than going through all the > > config screens. Back when I used portupgrade, I found that it was > > too easy to accidentally set some option for a port to a > > non-default value where it would

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:08:29 +1000 Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > >> The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > >> > > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. > > > > To be fair, the pkg(8) man

Re: ports and dependency hell

2017-02-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:03:56 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/2/17 3:17 am, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > > > On 07/02/2017 18:03, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> This is a serious post on a serious issue that ports framework > >> people seem unaware of. > >> (...) > >> > >> The call "It just works

Re: portsnap temporary files

2017-01-06 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean > up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them, > a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list. If you mean files under /var/db/portsnap/files/ then

Re: mail/spamassassin config option AS_ROOT is confusing

2016-12-20 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:53:43 -0700 Mike Brown wrote: > The AS_ROOT option in the mail/spamassassin port is really confusing > to me. Given that its description is "Run spamd as root > (recommended)", what actually happens is somewhat bonkers: > > The main spamd process always runs as root. If

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

2016-12-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:40:46 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: > > > On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: > >> > >> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is > >> an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

2016-12-12 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:42:07 -0700 Janky Jay, III wrote: > Hello scratch, > > On 12/11/2016 03:35 PM, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > > I have to admit that I avoid ports if at all possible because > > I've hardly ever been able to do a build that ran to completion. > > There's always some piece

Re: mail/mixmaster port issue

2016-12-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 15:36:35 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > > My portmaster is stopping at mail/mixmaster saying broken > > > > cannot find file > > > > > > > > Running FreeBSD 11. > > > > > > > > I checked and mixmaster is still avilable at sourceforge. > > > > > > > > Please fix.

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

2016-12-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 05:16:24 + Daniil Berendeev wrote: > 1) portmaster is not nice for the user. > If it comes over an error even in one little tiny port that is a > dependency for something bigger , it will abort its work and leave all > the other ports not updated. So, if you try to to do

Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg

2016-10-13 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:59:47 -0700 Julian Elischer wrote: > As the number of dependencies between packages get ever higher, it > becomes more and more difficult to compile packages and the > dependence on binary precompiled packages is increased. However > binary packages are unsuitable for some

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/libsysinfo

2016-09-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:03:37 -0400 Robert Burmeister wrote: > FreeBSD 10.3 i386. > > lxde-meta 1.0_7, "meta-port" of the LXDE desktop > x11/lxde-meta > dependes on lxpanel 0.6.2_1, Lightweight X11 desktop panel > x11/lxpanel > which depends on libsysinfo 0.0.2_1, GNU libc's sysinfo port for >

Re: GeForce GTX 750 Ti upgraded to unsupported

2016-09-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:54:17 -0700 Russell L. Carter wrote: > Greetings, > > Since I upgraded to 11/stable from 10/stable, it appears that my video > card is no longer supported by either nvidia-driver or > nvidia-driver-340: > > 77.208] (WW) NV: Ignoring unsupported device 0x10de1380 (GM107

Re: Firefox 47.0 hangs when accessing cnn.com

2016-06-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 20:18:52 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > You should be able to use ports-mgmt/portdowngrade. This assumes that > you still have the distribution file, as I suspect that it's no longer > available for download from Mozilla. Check, though. You can get many old versions:

Re: Poudriere question

2016-05-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 10 May 2016 17:05:20 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > Never seen poudriere remove distfiles, nor the ports tree do that, > what change are you referring to? > The problem isn't anything to do with poudriere. It was caused by a change to the checksum target in ports. The checksum of a

Re: Poudriere question

2016-05-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 10 May 2016 14:35:35 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 05/10/16 13:35, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > On Mon, 9 May 2016 20:15:12 +0200 > > Guido Falsi wrote: > > > >> On 05/09/16 19:52, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >

Re: Poudriere question

2016-05-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 9 May 2016 20:15:12 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 05/09/16 19:52, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently > > for different jails but using the same ports collection? > > > > Yes it is, or at least should be. >

Re: Ports tree gone unstable?

2016-04-28 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Don Lewis wrote: > I'd lose many hours of potential build time. Because of the > infrequent upgrades I would have to deal with all of the intervening > special cases in UPDATING that accumulated between upgrades, and the > portupgrade -fr and -a options

Re: Deriving base port/package names

2016-04-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 06:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > what would be a proper sort of sed command to extract > > _just_ the port/package names, without the version numbers > > attached? > > This has changed in the past so may not currently be 100% correct

Re: Is it possible to specify which files are backed up to MASTER_SITE_BACKUP?

2015-11-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 21:57:17 -0800 Yuri wrote: > I have the complex fetch stage which takes one set of distfiles, and > produces another distfile, only that distfile is used in build. > > There is the variable CKSUMFILES that controls which distfiles are > included in distinfo (in my case all

Re: ccache's cleanup algorithm

2015-11-03 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:26:46 -0600 Scott Bennett wrote: > In ccache's cleanup.c module, the comments say that files are > deleted from the cache on a LRU basis. However, the code refers to > mtime, not atime, so it appears that ccache is, in reality, using a > Least Recently *Modified*

Re: distfiles cleaner

2015-10-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:16:37 +0200 Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean=1=0=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > portsclean --distclean > Clean out all the distfiles that

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-14 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 08:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > You'd rather an rc script fails at run-time and shuts down the wrong > > daemon than fail when the script is being developed? > > It's not so much where the script fai

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-12 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:46:23 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Roger Marquis wrote: > > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > >> It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid > >> might have been reassigned to another process if the original > >> daemo

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:55:58 +0100 (BST) Kevin Golding wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "RW via freebsd-ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> > > Sent: Friday, 11 September, 2015 4:18:50 PM > > > > did you set the comm

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid > > might have been reassigned to another process if the original daemon > > died without deleting its pid file. &

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:42:18 +0100 (BST) Kevin Golding wrote: > I've been trying to work on a new port and it's my first that uses an > rc script so I've been expecting a few bumps, but there's one thing I > can't seem to fix and it's a blocker. I can't stop the daemon! > > It dopes create a

Re: www/squid's cache dir

2015-07-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:39:39 -0700 (MST) timp wrote: Squid can use more than one cache directory, so it makes sense to have the default cache directory as a sub-directory of squid/. Additional cache dirs can be created manually by user in /var/squid, I agree. Like

Re: www/squid's cache dir

2015-07-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:25:56 -0700 (MST) timp wrote: Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you? Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is better. My point was that I can't see any difference isn't a good argument for making disruptive change. I think it's obvious

Re: www/squid's cache dir

2015-07-14 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:33:33 +0300 Pavel Timofeev wrote: Hi! A question was born in my mind about www/squid port: Do we really need a separate /var/squid dir for 'cache' and always empty 'logs' subdirs? Squid's logs are really in /var/log/squid, not in /var/squid/logs. So I think what

Re: About Gxneur

2015-06-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:48:39 -0400 kpn...@pobox.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:33:08AM +0300, ??? ??? wrote: Hello! I apologize for my English, I use a translator. I noticed that when I install gxneur is one problem. Xneur installed and working properly. But gxneur not

Re: Difference between fetch(1) and firefox http-access

2014-12-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:59:54 +0100 O. Hartmann wrote: Sorry for the noise, many thanks for the quick solution ... For future reference, cross-posting to multiple mailing lists is widely considered to be bad netiquette (unless it's absolutely essential). If you don't get a quick answer, threads

Re: Deleting ports distfiles

2014-11-18 Thread RW
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:40:03 -0600 Adam Vande More wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:12 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: portmaster removes any files not associated with currently installed packages, the other two do can do that, but also have the option to leave any files

claws-mail's build dependency on Tex Live

2014-11-18 Thread RW
If you build claws-mail from ports you might want to think about unchecking the manual option. It brings in a build dependency on textproc/docbook-utils which in turn depends on print/texlive-texmf. This has a 1663 MB distfile and installs 1477 MB of files. Obviously the manual option needs to

Re: Deleting ports distfiles

2014-11-17 Thread RW
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 14:10:00 -0900 Royce Williams wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 1:55 PM, andrew clarke m...@ozzmosis.com wrote: On Sun 2014-11-16 23:29:37 UTC+0100, Dr. Peter Voigt (pvo...@uos.de) wrote: I have just seen that /usr/ports/distfiles has grown up to 12 GiB. My hopefully

Re: new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread RW
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:27:39 -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote: Vick Khera vi...@khera.org writes: Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: desktop-file-utils. This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional packages including python, perl, pcre, glib. I don't think so.

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-02 Thread RW
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:07:23 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:56:21 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi all, tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files convenient are taking a lot of space for free, we can reduce the size

Re: service doen't get started at boottime, but can start manually

2014-09-07 Thread RW
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:43:08 +0200 O. Hartmann wrote: I renamed the script back to refdb.sh by now and the service starts again as expected. I guess the spawning into a subshell fails somehow at that point when booting the box. FWIW refdb.sh works because /etc/rc.d/local will run pre-rcng

Re: service doen't get started at boottime, but can start manually

2014-09-07 Thread RW
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 10:02:24 -0500 Scot Hetzel wrote: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:38 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:43:08 +0200 O. Hartmann wrote: I renamed the script back to refdb.sh by now and the service starts again as expected. I guess the spawning

Re: service doen't get started at boottime, but can start manually

2014-09-07 Thread RW
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 18:00:24 +0100 Mike Clarke wrote: On Sunday 07 Sep 2014 09:53:51 Scot Hetzel wrote: The scripts in 3-6, and 8 are wrong. According to /etc/rc.subr, the '# PROVIDE: ' is mandatory to detect a rc script: Well it appears that they are only half wrong. Scripts

Re: Berkeley DB 4 and portupgrade

2014-08-29 Thread RW
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:05:31 +0200 Matthias Andree wrote: You're looking in the wrong places, you should have: /usr/ports/INDEX-10.db and /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db As Chris Rees pointed out pkgdb.db isn't created anymore. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Berkeley DB 4 and portupgrade

2014-08-23 Thread RW
I've lost track of how portupgrade works these days (10.0). Has it switched to using pkg's sqlite database? I was wondering whether I needed to do anything for the DB 4x deletions, but I don't see a separate database file: $ ls -l /var/db/pkg total 41638 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 39279616

make checksum problems

2014-07-25 Thread RW
There seems to be a change in make checksum where it's deleting preexisting files that don't match their checksums. This is having two effects: 1. downloads don't resume any more because the partial file is deleted 2. if a make checksum runs while another make process is downloading a

Re: A simple ports question

2014-06-03 Thread RW
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 21:15:15 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:09:10PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Functionally, what is the difference between: pkg_delete Y and: cd /usr/ports/X/Y; make deinstall ? none There is one important

Is Pan working for anyone?

2014-05-26 Thread RW
Is Pan working for anyone? The PR from last year has been closed, but I'm still seeing it dump core with a segmentation fault on FreeBSD 10.0. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182203 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: smplayer dependency on mplayer1

2014-05-20 Thread RW
On Mon, 19 May 2014 17:54:26 -0700 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Looking at the Makefile for multimedia/smplayer it appears to me that smplayer is dependent upon the 1.x version of mplayer being installed, however there exists what I would guess is a later and better version of mplayer called

Re: Repair pkgng

2014-04-10 Thread RW
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:07:55 -0500 Scot Hetzel wrote: Portmaster is not breaking hier(7). It's not, because it's information about what was used to build the packages, so /var/db/pkg is a legitimate location. Portmaster was originally designed to use the old pkg tools (pkg_install, ...),

Re: Repair pkgng

2014-04-10 Thread RW
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:03:09 +0100 RW wrote: It's newer than the recently reworked version of the options framework, but /var/db/port was used for options before that. Sorry, I meant: the recently reworked version of the options framework is newer than portmaster

Re: pkgng abilities (was: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated)

2014-04-05 Thread RW
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 07:55:48 -0400 Robert Huff wrote: Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org writes: pkg(8) does a damn sight more than the old pkg_tools. Granted, though much of it I currently have little use for. :-) pkgng can do almost everything the old system can, and does

Re: Spamd

2014-04-03 Thread RW
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:48:25 +0200 Jos Chrispijn wrote: Sergey V. Dyatko: use `sockstat -l4 -p783` instead. It show you what user-command-pid listen that port USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root perl 1404 5 tcp4 127.0.0.1:783

Re: Spamd

2014-04-03 Thread RW
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:49:47 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: On 04/03/14 13:57, Jos Chrispijn wrote: Sergey V. Dyatko: use `sockstat -l4 -p783` instead. It show you what user-command-pid listen that port I killed process 1402 and started Spamd. That did the trick, thanks! I am very

Re: Spamd

2014-04-03 Thread RW
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:57:29 +1100 John Marshall wrote: On 04/04/2014 05:13, Jos Chrispijn wrote: Since my last Spamd port update I get this error when I try to start spamd: spamd not running? (check /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid). Starting spamd. For SpamAssassin, you need to

Re: Why would a port use its own existence as an excuse to fail install?

2014-02-16 Thread RW
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:14:54 -0600 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: A nice thing about portmaster is that it's smarter than portupgrade. ... In this case, I'd guess, portmaster ... Which fails, since it's already installed, thus... For me portupgrade did that upgrade perfectly even though I forgot

ccache and clang/llvm links

2014-02-09 Thread RW
I was wondering why the ccache compiler link options for clang and llvm are off by default. AFAIK these links don't affect World build, so I was wondering if there are any serious problems with ports. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Portmanager vs portupgrade

2014-01-23 Thread RW
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:39:59 + Matthew Seaman wrote: maintained by the same people (bdrewery mostly). portupgrade requires you to install ruby as well: that's probably the biggest deciding factor still extant. For me the biggest factor is that portupgrade doesn't stop on the first

Re: Ports via svn, make fetchindex and make compatibility with NetBSD

2013-12-04 Thread RW
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:27:57 + Matthew Seaman wrote: If you do need a copy of the index, then you have two choices * build your own. 'make index' will thrash your machine for upwards of twenty minutes, That's pessimistic, on my low-end i5 with low-performance disks, it takes

Re: Ports via svn, make fetchindex and make compatibility with NetBSD

2013-12-03 Thread RW
On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 04:41:17 -0800 (PST) Thomas Mueller wrote: Is it necessary to make fetchindex after downloading or updating the ports tree using svn? Not absolutely, it's needed for portupgrade, port searches, and a number of utilities use it for speeding various things up. I have new

Re: Upgrading Perl... Somebody just shoot me and put me out of my misery!

2013-11-25 Thread RW
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:25:26 -0800 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Anyway, the specific broken port I'm trying to fix at the moment is net/p5-Socket, which is failing thusly: I had to revert the switch to threaded perl because of this, dns/p5-Net-DNS, net/p5-IP-Country and

Re: Ports distfiles mirror - e.g. ftp://ftp4.de.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/distfiles/

2013-11-01 Thread RW
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:00:52 +0100 Matthias Petermann wrote: Is there some automatic mechanism in place which does this mirroring, or is this done manually from a ports committer once he commits a new or updated port? I'm just curious because I can find the distfiles from some of my

Re: bsdadminscripts and pkng

2013-11-01 Thread RW
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Jakub Lach wrote: Actually, nevermind those. They are supporting pkng just fine. Real bumps when converted to pkgng was: - portmaster cannot use packages for dependencies- huge let down - pkg_cleanup doesn't support pkng distviper uses pkg_info

Re: multimedia/libbluray -- IGNORE... Why?

2013-10-05 Thread RW
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:01:19 -0700 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: In message 20131004113101.GB42900@oldfaithful.bebik.local, you wrote: Hi, I Made a check in the SVN and libbluray was never marked IGNORE, at least BROKEN for some java reasons. Setting BROKEN sets IGNORE. Well, I'm just

Re: Packages missing after Re-installation with portmaster

2013-10-05 Thread RW
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:44:52 +0200 Fabian Keil wrote: I'm occasionally missing packages after trying to rebuild them with portmaster. For example I just lost liferea: fk@r500 ~ $portmaster liferea === Currently installed version: liferea-1.8.15 ... === SU Running pkg_delete for

Re: multimedia/libbluray -- IGNORE... Why?

2013-10-04 Thread RW
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:17:12 -0700 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Why is the multimedia/libbluray port marked as IGNORE in the current ports tree? If you try to build it, it will tell you why. More to the point, why didn't whoever marked it as IGNORE have the simple courtesy to put at least

Re: SVN RELEASE_9_2_0

2013-10-01 Thread RW
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:56:32 + Thomas Mueller wrote: # Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports for # the 9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and built a # little before -stable got tagged for release. # Thanks, # Jason Ports don't belong

dspam looking for libhash_drv.so in wrong location

2013-09-18 Thread RW
Under 10-current I've had a problem with dspam failing with the error: dlopen() failed: /usr/local/lib/libhash_drv.so: Cannot open /usr/local/lib/libhash_drv.so The actual library is located under /usr/local/lib/dspam/. (I have it working again with a temporary symlink)

Re: Perl port to select in make.conf

2013-09-03 Thread RW
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:22:23 +0400 (MSK) Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, RW wrote: When you install perl (as part of an upgrade or as a dependency) it writes the new PERL_VERSION into make.conf. Well, all would go well unless it was a *special* make.conf used for poudriere

Re: Perl port to select in make.conf

2013-09-03 Thread RW
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:46:03 -0500 Mark Felder wrote: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013, at 13:31, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Dear colleagues, which variable should be defined in make.conf to switch from current 5.14 to, say, 5.16 (for poudriere package building)? Naive PERL_VER=5.16

Re: Perl port to select in make.conf

2013-09-02 Thread RW
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 23:01:48 +0400 (MSK) Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Boris Samorodov wrote: Приветствую, Дмитрий -- давно не виделись, ;-) sme here ;) which variable should be defined in make.conf to switch from current 5.14 to, say, 5.16 (for poudriere package

Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs fusefs_enable=YES

2013-08-22 Thread RW
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500 Mark Felder wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote: I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better judgement, I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS work. It looks like fuse has been moved into the base system

  1   2   3   4   >