Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Matthias Apitz wrote: On Monday, 11 December 2017 04:56:04 CET, Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día viernes, diciembre 08, 2017 a las 03:13:02p. m. -0700, Warren Block escribió: Hmm, why -d

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día viernes, diciembre 08, 2017 a las 03:13:02p. m. -0700, Warren Block escribió: Hmm, why -d ${USER} if this is already known who I am from the ~/.forward file location? Because as a sysadmin, then you can copy it to another user without having

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Paul Schmehl wrote: As my second post shows, I can't make FLAVOR=py27 install either. So, I guess I'm dead in the water. Until I can install py-setuptools, nothing else will work, including devel/llvm40. All I've had to do was py-setuptools. The default flavor is py27,

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día viernes, diciembre 08, 2017 a las 11:19:03a. m. -0700, Warren Block escribió: I do, and invoke procmail from a .forward file. % cat ~/.forward "|exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f-" Do you know if maildrop can be used in a simil

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:58:55AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Jos Chrispijn wrote: A little concernedthat I got no response to this. Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) procmail is ancient, and has had known quality

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Jos Chrispijn wrote: A little concernedthat I got no response to this. Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the time. Consider maildrop as a more powerful and more maintained replacement that is

Re: THANK YOU for flavors! (fwd)

On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Thursday, 7 December 2017 at 11:02:51 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:01:51 +1100 (EST), Dave Horsfall wrote: Since we're being pedantic, note that this should be AEDT. EST is ambiguous, but in general refers to the east

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Russell Haley wrote: Thanks! I'll play with this on the weekend. Please create a review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/ and add me as a reviewer. Thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Question on upgrading ports after 9.3->10.3

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote: Me again :-) I finally got around to following the notes that David Wolfskill kindly provided (thanks!) and apart from some oddity about "httpd" requiring a missing "libdb-4.2.so.2" (which will get rebuilt anyway), I'm a bit wary of this: 7. Back up

Re: The future of portmaster

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: Hi all, portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state. I'm a portmaster user, because, in some cases, it fits my needs. In other cases, I use other tools, like poudriere or synth, that are really great. I don't want to open a

Re: xorg-server 1.18.4 segfaults

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote: The ports tree still thinks llvm37 is really needed by some of these, and trying to pkg delete llvm37 wants to also delete many installed applications.  This seems

Re: xorg-server 1.18.4 segfaults

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Koichiro IWAO wrote: Konstantin, Deinstalling llvm37 helped, thanks! P.S. I actually deinstalled all older versions of llvm, llvm36, llvm37. -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta

Re: Welcome to our new portmgr members

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, René Ladan wrote: Hello, last week the Ports Management Team (portmgr) gained two new members: Adam Weinberger (adamw@) and Mark Felder (feld@). Both have been a ports committer for many years and Mark is also quite active on the Ports Security Team. Yours truly has also

Re: Subscription for committer

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote: On 12/19/2016 20:22, Mark Linimon wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:06PM -0600, John Marino wrote: It's a natural reaction to stop attempting to contribute when previous contributions don't get "attention they deserve". Which some people (including

Re: Subscription for committer

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote: On 12/19/2016 04:18, Boris Samorodov wrote: 17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет: I am not subscribed to the mail list A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML? Is it a joke? I don't want to participate in this list. The only reason

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:40:46 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice situation. People have been trying to get

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Daniil Berendeev wrote: 5) svn repository. I don't want to spark a holy war and I don't belong to those type of people who are always obsessed that something isn't done in their way. But guys, svn is not a good tool for ports. Just for one reason, actually (as for me, I

Re: Checking port option descriptions

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Margaret wrote: [Default] On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:47:10 +0100, Mike Clarke wrote: For cases where one line comments won't suffice how about providing the facility to include an extra text file in a port (perhaps "pkg-options") containing notes

Checking port option descriptions

Ports options ask the user to make a decision on whether to enable that option. Option descriptions are critical for this, giving the user information to help them make that decision. Unfortunately, what is clear to the porter is often not clear to a user. The Porter's Handbook says "Do not

Re: What happened to 'make missing'?

On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 15 août 2016 20:35:56 -0600 Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote: | On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Mathieu Arnold wrote: | |> Something changed, at one point, make missing used to work right. |> |> Could you open a PR with all that

Re: What happened to 'make missing'?

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Something changed, at one point, make missing used to work right. Could you open a PR with all that information, so that it doesn't get lost ? I reviewed https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7504, which seems to work. Can still enter a PR if you like.

Re: What happened to 'make missing'?

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Chris Rees wrote: Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Chris Rees wrote: Warren Block wrote: The missing target used to be very useful to see what impact installing a new port would have. It seems to be increasingly broken. On my desktop, any random port claims

Re: What happened to 'make missing'?

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Chris Rees wrote: Warren Block wrote: The missing target used to be very useful to see what impact installing a new port would have. It seems to be increasingly broken. On my desktop, any random port claims that misc/dejagnu and lang/expect are missing. Neither

What happened to 'make missing'?

The missing target used to be very useful to see what impact installing a new port would have. It seems to be increasingly broken. On my desktop, any random port claims that misc/dejagnu and lang/expect are missing. Neither are installed, neither is installed as a dependency for any port

Re: Download all source before compiling the port

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 09.06.2016 01:19, David Wolfskill wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:15:04PM -0300, Rafael Rodrigues Nakano wrote: Hello, Is there a way to download everything required by a port before starting to build it and its dependencies (so I can let

Re: 'porting' AMD compiler suite

On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: On 04/10/16 20:22, Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: Or set the (g)make variable 'MAKE' to gmake & let it propogate What you are doing is, in effect, creating a port. If you create a real

Re: 'porting' AMD compiler suite

On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: Or set the (g)make variable 'MAKE' to gmake & let it propogate What you are doing is, in effect, creating a port. If you create a real port, there are numerous tools to deal with just this sort of problem, like USES=gmake. The

Re: devel/arduino - bad advice given in pkg-message

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016, Warren Block wrote: Here is how I propose to rewrite that: -G grouplist Set secondary group memberships for an account. grouplist is a comma, space, or tab-separated list of group names or group numbers. /etc/group is modified

Re: devel/arduino - bad advice given in pkg-message

On Sat, 26 Mar 2016, Janky Jay, III wrote: Hi Torfinn, On 03/25/2016 10:20 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Janky Jay, III wrote: While your solution is not incorrect, your assumption on the proposed/given solution from the port is. The '-G'

Re: pkg 1.6.3 unable to upgrade, URL in pkg.conf problem?

On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 10 Feb 2016, at 20:10, Daniel Eischen wrote: I'm trying to upgrade my ports with a set that I built using poudriere. I'm running FreeBSD-current r295354, pkg 1.6.3. The packages

Re: Removing documentation

On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Jim Ohlstein wrote: The build time of "like 20-30 minutes, at most" is ummm... let' just call it optimistic. I only needed five new dependencies. Poudriere was unable to take advantage of more than two parallel builders except for a rather short overlap where it used

Re: Removing documentation

On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, John Marino wrote: On 2/9/2016 7:20 PM, Warren Block wrote: If you have the build log, I'd like to see it. Dewayne G. got an error after overriding CPUTYPE (do you do that too?) and I'm thinking it's sensitive to CPU and I'd like to know more. Yes, I use CPUTYPE?=core

Re: Removing documentation

On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, John Marino wrote: On 2/9/2016 5:00 PM, Warren Block wrote: 2:20, that's two hours and twenty minutes, to build and install here on an Atom N270 system. 2:06 for gcc6-aux, most of the rest for ncurses. That does not include distfile download time. Disk space used was 252M

Re: Removing documentation

On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote: Hello, You have a tool presented as "official" that hasn't had it's original maintainer in 4 years and was only kept on life support up until 9 months ago. Agreed, the "official" (the term used is "recommended") status is gone. But that's a

Re: Removing documentation (was: [Bug 206922] Handbook: Chapter 4.5+ changes)

On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, John Marino wrote: I am not portmgr, but do use portmaster for updating ports on systems running STABLE or HEAD. I still see no tool which provides the features of portmaster. I also realize that this is far from a universal opinion. Please do an honest "fly-off" between

Re: Removing documentation

On Sun, 7 Feb 2016, John Marino wrote: 1. Remove all mention of portmaster. That's what this PR recommends. 2. Do nothing. 3. Update the documentation to indicate the current status, recommending alternatives if possible. Number 4 is missing: find a maintainer for it. I would

Re: gnupg-1.4.20.tar.bz2.sig not available by FTP

On Thu, 24 Dec 2015, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: Try make makesum. Noo! Or at least not unless you realize the security implications of this. It is essentially overriding a warning that the distfiles might have been tampered with. ___

Re: Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote: Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote in alpine.bsf.2.20.1508221448070.93...@wonkity.com: wb It's not clear to me how people that currently have the old wb print/ghostscript should switch to the new version. wb wb 'portmaster -o print/ghostscript9-x11

Re: Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote: Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote in 20150821.022521.792759762853683209@allbsd.org: hr So I would suggest either of the following two plans: hr hr Plan A: Just remove print/ghostscript*-nox11. ... hr Plan B: Remove print/ghostscript*-nox11 and

Re: Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11

On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote: Plan A: Just remove print/ghostscript*-nox11. Currently ghostscript depends on X11 libraries of ice, sm, x11, xext, and xt. While one can still eliminate these dependency by disabling X11 in PORT_OPTIONS, the pre-complied packages always depend on

Re: Rebuilding my ports area

On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, David Wolfskill wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:21:07PM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p20 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jul 21 19:29:33 UTC 2015 Having completely scragged my ports area following various changes to pkg/pkgng/etc, and being unable to sysinstall it

Re: Please help un-confuse me about vuxml

On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 2015/07/03 14:01, David Wolfskill wrote: And that combination of things catalyzed this note. Here's what I'm seeing: - There is a claim that the port to which I was trying to update was vulnerable per vuxml. vuxml currently states that netpbm

Re: LibreSSL infects ports, causes problems

On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 04/09/15 17:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: For now candidates are: libarchive ncurses readline (which will have then to be linked to ports ncurses and not base version through the magic of fake libtermcap) openssl libedit(?) One I noticed recently

Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option

On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Chris H wrote: Here is where we will clash; I've been riding *BSD for over 20yrs. It's *biggest* asset has been in it's flexibility -- it wasn't another Linux dist, that required me to essentially become a clone of every other Linux install. The Ports system, and /src

Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?

On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 27 décembre 2014 20:35:03 -0600 Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: | On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 08:20:45AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: | I think I could make a good case for moving that ports FAQ into the | Porter's Handbook, even

Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?

On Sat, 27 Dec 2014, olli hauer wrote: On 2014-12-27 03:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi ports@ What URL(s) do I need under https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ to get to the Attic for last copy of eg ports/mail/demime ? How is one supposed to find URLs /svn rev nos ? (I have a local svn if it helps,

Re: gnomehier

On Fri, 26 Dec 2014, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 26.12.2014 um 20:22 schrieb Jos Chrispijn: With portmanager I got this line: === The misc/gnomehier port has been deleted: Not needed anymore But I still have it active. How can I remove it when the port itself is nog existing anymore

Re: [SOLVED] multimedia/x264 build failure, linker error

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2014-11-25, Andrew Berg aberg...@my.hennepintech.edu wrote: As I have stated already in this thread, I am trying to get an UPDATING entry committed: x264 was split into the application and its library. If an application that uses

Re: Deleting ports distfiles

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, RW wrote: portupgrade's portsclean utility and distviper (from sysutils/bsdadminscripts) can do it more flexibly. portmaster removes any files not associated with currently installed packages, the other two do can do that, but also have the option to leave any files that

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, mounting the ports tree on a 512k aligned slice will reduce the slack you appear to be referring to. zfs(8) also has this ability. Not alignment, but filesystem block size. But that can

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:16:09 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, mounting the ports tree on a 512k aligned slice will reduce the slack

Re: Moved ports not being handled

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Warren Block wrote: Recently, portmaster kept wanting to upgrade these three ports: graphics/libcdr01 graphics/libfreehand print/libmspub01 It succeeded in rebuilding them every time, but always saw them as needing to be upgraded. Checking the output showed

Re: Moved ports not being handled

On Sun, 2 Nov 2014, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Recently, portmaster kept wanting to upgrade these three ports: graphics/libcdr01 graphics/libfreehand print/libmspub01 Seeing this again with textproc/libmwaw. The new version is installed, but the old version remains. I've seen similar issues.

Moved ports not being handled

Recently, portmaster kept wanting to upgrade these three ports: graphics/libcdr01 graphics/libfreehand print/libmspub01 It succeeded in rebuilding them every time, but always saw them as needing to be upgraded. Checking the output showed this: === The graphics/libcdr port moved to

Re: net-mgmt/icinga2: web interface with FreeBSD?

On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, O. Hartmann wrote: I was wondering if someone has successfully configured ICINGA2 on FreeBSD, using the Web-2 or even Web frontend. I have a small Icinga2 setup. It uses Icinga (1) for a web interface. ICINGA2 is successfully installed on my systems, also IDO on

Re: CFT: Update to xf86-video-ati 7.5.0

On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: Before updating xf86-video-ati to 7.5.0, we would like some people to try it out. The reason is that 7.4.0 was crashing for several users, so we want to be sure it's fixed in 7.5.0. Additional tests. All of these worked: Radeon HD 6550D (AMD

Re: CFT: Update to xf86-video-ati 7.5.0

On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: What we're especially looking for is report of successful or failed startup of the X server. With 7.4.0, the server would crash during startup. But with 7.5.0, none of us could reproduce the problem. Working here on a Radeon 5750.

Re: dns/bind99 and the migration from FreeBSD 9.x - 10.x

On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, David Wolfskill wrote: After a week (or two), I expect to cut over fully, and perform the process documented near the bottom of portmaster(8) to rebuild/iinstall all installed ports under stable/10. There is a version updated for pkg in

Re: Cant get gimp to use xsane with FreeBSD 10.-RELRASE

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Mike Clarke wrote: On Friday 29 August 2014 00:35:03 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: I installed graphics/gimp-app including the xsane plugin on 11-CURRENT/i386 and it works fine. Current versions installed: % pkg info gimp-app xsane gimp-app-2.8.10_5,1 xsane-0.999_2

Re: OPTIONS_REQUIRES

On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Daniel Morante wrote: I've recently had this issue . The following forum post provides a decent work around for the time being: https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=22t=47412 Yes, that is why I posted here. By adding this, we can make handling option dependencies

Visual options definitions

Defining port options through variables makes it somewhat hard to visualize. Could we consider a visual definition? OPTIONS_VISUAL= \ /* normal options */\ FOO Build with Foo support \ BAR Runtime BAR support \ /* only one */ \ radio[

OPTIONS_REQUIRES

Right now, we have no standard method of making options depend on other options. For example, many ports have an X11 option, and later options that require X11. If the user disables X11 but chooses one of the options that require it, the best case is that the port build stops with a message.

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Craig Rodrigues wrote: What I'd like to see is an article on freebsd.org either on the wiki or in the handbook, which compares using apt, yum, rpm, whatever to pkg. Is anyone interested in working on an article like this? I don't have the bandwidth right now. A person to

Re: Some suggestions about PKGNG documentation

On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Patrick Powell wrote: On 07/05/14 03:18, Mike Brown wrote: Warren Block wrote: The documentation team has a standing offer to either assist with markup or accept content-only submissions and do the markup on them. That's good to know. I was under the impression it had

Re: Some suggestions about PKGNG documentation

On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Mike Brown wrote: Patrick Powell wrote: TUTORIAL: The Savant's Guide To Ports, Packages, PkgNG Try to put a lot of the information about pkgng, repositories, etc. in a single place. I suggest a tutorial format, rather than a user manual format, with references to the

Re: [CFT]: net-mgmt/icinga2

On Sun, 29 Jun 2014, Lars Engels wrote: On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 09:49:52PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: The icinga.conf-sample does not appear to be installed anywhere by the current port. It can be found in the staging directory, stage/usr/local/share/examples/icinga/apache22/. It's

Re: [CFT]: net-mgmt/icinga2

I've just been setting this up, and had a question and a couple of notes. Originally, I just installed icinga2. The icinga2 port does not depend on icinga, but appears to need it. Is this really a dependency, or are the two ports meant to be separate? The icinga.conf-sample does not appear

Re: Abandoning the sguil ports

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: I am the maintainer for security/sguil-server, security/sguil-sensor and security/sguil-client. I am officially abandoning the ports. The security/sguil-server port is not staged. The other two are. The software has a new release out, so all three

Re: mail/alpine quota.patch.gz fetch error

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Greg Rivers wrote: I think the mirror sites and perhaps the checksums for quota.patch.gz need to be refreshed. It appears that DIST_SUBDIR should not have been removed. The attached patch was a quick hack last night, can't vouch for correctness. Also, the maildir

Re: Splitting devel/subversion into SEVERAL ports -- how fine-grained do we want to see it?

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Matthieu. You wrote 8 2014 ?., 15:41:42: MV Holy... MV Is this Debian now? How about 14 packages to have granularity over what MV sub-library needed, and 23 others for each svn* command? And don't forget headers. MV An aspect of ports I

Re: How are ports built now

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: Yes, I do have a few ports with none-default options. The problem is, they're critical ports (like apache22). At present, these have to be built from ports. Long-term, there is a plan to have multiple packages for ports with options.

Re: pkg 2 ng conversion

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote: On 2014-05-28 11:30 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote: Hello, On 5/28/14, 2:13 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote: On a new/fresh install, V10, should a person immediately place WITH_PKGNG=yes in the make.conf ? And then is it not required to run pkg2ng ? Or is it implied?

Re: How are ports built now

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: --On June 8, 2014 at 10:32:33 AM -0600 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: Yes, I do have a few ports with none-default options. The problem is, they're critical ports (like apache22). At present

Re: Struggling mightily with port updates

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: I upgraded two systems to 8.4 and ran portmaster -ad to update all ports. Most of it worked fine, but I'm in docbook hell now. I also don't understand this: === All (6) === The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:

Re: pkg 2 ng conversion

On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote: On 2014-06-08 10:55 AM, Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote: No. pkg is just a package manager. It does not replace ports, it just handles packages. Like the old package manager, binary packages can be downloaded and installed

Re: Who was the mental genius

On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, John Marino wrote: On 6/6/2014 10:18, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Sure, but really a couple of lines to warn people and wave them towards next steps is probably advisable next time. Maybe we can alter the uname -a string to show the EOL so that every time the machine boots

Re: Who was the mental genius

On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: No offense was meant. I deliberately chose the subject to stimulate discussion, which it has obviously done. Stimulating discussion without insulting people generally gives better results. Look, we are all doing the best we can with what we've got.

Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: Hello, I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion. Following are result of my investigation: 1. With http: and https: checkout always causes segfault, while with svn: it never happens. 2. Segfault happens only when

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Hurd wrote: I would venture that docs bugs and certain classes of website bugs rarely have communications. For example: ... There are trivial bugs in any class, but it's a mistake to think that most of any particular class are that way. I do agree that some

Re: libfreetype.so.9 errors

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Beeblebrox wrote: Latest compiled ports result in below message for several binaries: Shared object libfreetype.so.9 not found, required by chrome So far the ports I have seen this are www/midori,

Re: Repair pkgng

On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: Hi, So, after the detour... On 4/9/2014 12:38, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: Though it makes no sense in my mind. Distfiles belong to ports not packages. What problem was solved by moving this? This still doesn't make sense. Distfiles are of no concern

Checking Installed Ports

Using pkg_libchk from Dominic Fandrey's excellent sysutils/bsdadminscripts port has helped locate ports that needed to be rebuilt before they became problems. Now there's pkg check, although I confess to not understanding the man page. Some options appear to check installed packages, while

Re: Checking Installed Ports

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Warren Block wrote: Using pkg_libchk from Dominic Fandrey's excellent sysutils/bsdadminscripts port has helped locate ports that needed to be rebuilt before they became problems. Now there's pkg check, although I confess to not understanding the man page. Some options

RE: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote: There is a major inconsistency with what pkg_version -v says is outdated and what pkgng says. Of course. pkg_version looks at the text files in /var/db/pkg, while pkg looks at the database local.sqlite in that directory. The first step in using pkg is

RE: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote: From: Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:23 PM To: sindrome Cc: 'Robert Huff'; po...@freebsd.org Subject: RE: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote: There is a major

Re: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Sindrome wrote: On Apr 4, 2014, at 11:09 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote: From: Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com] On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, sindrome wrote: There is a major inconsistency with what pkg_version -v says

Re: changes to base system DNS

On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Robert Huff wrote: Warren Block writes: From dim memory of a couple of weeks ago... Making sure I understand: doing this (or the corrected version) will bring up named at the same point in the boot process as using system named in previous versions? It looks

Re: postfix depends on db41??

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Lowell Gilbert wrote: LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes: # portmaster mail/postfix210 [...] === Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports === Launching child to install databases/db41 === postfix210-2.10.3,1 databases/db41 (1/1) Why? postfix certainly

Re: portmaster, pkg, virtualbox-ose

On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Chris Whitehouse wrote: === You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster flags emulators/virtualbox-ose === Exiting But restarting with # portmaster emulators/virtualbox-ose starts by cleaning for virtualbox then starts again. Have I

Re: docbook updates fiasco continues...

On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Serpent7776 wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:05:07 +0100 kaltheat kalth...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, just for the records: The instructions in UPDATING did not work for me in tcsh (which is standard shell in FreeBSD as far as I know). I had to switch to bourne shell

Re: How do submit updates to ports?

On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: El 20/02/2014 02:28, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven free...@skysmurf.nl escribió: Daniel Morante wrote: How do I send updates to ports that I created/maintain? Send a PR, either by using send-pr(1) or through the web interface at

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

On Sun, 9 Feb 2014, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 02/08/14 18:08, Warren Block wrote: This may very well come back to bite you in the future, Well, as I said, this is just a temporary fix for something that, IMVHO, shouldn't have broken in the first place. Well, yes. causing mysterious

Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature?

On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Today I started some ports' upgrade and icu went from 50.1.2 to 52.1. As soon as this happened, lots of applications are not working anymore. ... Hmmm... so, to make it short: # ln -s libicudata.so.50.1.2 libicu # ln -s libicudata.so.50.1.2

Re: Portmanager vs portupgrade

On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Jos Chrispijn wrote: I lately read more often that Portmaster is preferred about portupdate. Can you tell me why this is? I know that portupdate is Ruby driven, but furthermore I cannot detect the real advantages one above the other? Your subject line mentions

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means chaos. More variants means more complication. if options for nls mean

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: Sorry, but I have a quite opposite

pkg_libchk (was Re: gvfs on FreeBSD 10 fails to build)

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Kevin Oberman wrote: Possibly hijacking the thread, but isn't it time that pkg_libchk was made a part of the base system? It comes up over and over as a tool to simplify dealing with dealing with shareable library version bumps and even more important for dealing with the

Re: Upgrading Perl... Somebody just shoot me and put me out of my misery!

On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 23.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Mark Martinec: On Friday 22 November 2013 21:40:07 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Now, one last little thing... The note in the UPDATING file dated 20131120 gives essentially the same instructions as the one dated 20131023,

Re: State of the Porters' Handbook

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Gabor Pali wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: We generally don't refer to pkgng in the docs: please use pkg. Well, I saw pkg written as pkgng in some other section (5.2.2.2. PORTEPOCH) of the Porter's Handbook. Actually, I

  1   2   3   4   >