Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted

On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> > > OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected >>> > > when i did >> > the test... >> > >> > snip ... >> > >> > >> > So it seems more and more the reported issue is a local one. > > I agree. So you *don't* need testing o

Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted

On 2012-09-01 21:06, Waitman Gobble wrote: > olli hauer wrote .. >> On 2012-09-01 20:28, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> Olli Hauer wrote .. >>>> On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>>> Olli Hauer wrote .. >>>>>> Hi all, >>

Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted

On 2012-09-01 20:28, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Olli Hauer wrote .. >> On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> Olli Hauer wrote .. >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 >>>&

Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted

On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Olli Hauer wrote .. >> Hi all, >> >> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 >> optionsNG rewrite. >> >> I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but

apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted

Hi all, I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 optionsNG rewrite. I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework therefore I need some more testers. What does the patch

Re: [HEADS UP] Change to the header in ports Makefiles

On 2012-09-01 08:42, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > An idea has been floating around for some time, and it was brought up again > on the ports@ mailing list recently, please remove the extraneous header > information from the Makefile, leaving only the $FreeBSD$ id on the first > line. > > It is an idea

Re: PKG_NG: pkg deinstall fails with "argument list too long"

On 2012-08-27 23:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:43:54PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >>>> On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wro

Re: PKG_NG: pkg deinstall fails with "argument list too long"

On 2012-08-27 23:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:22:27PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote: >>> PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be >>> deinstalled: >>> >>

Re: PKG_NG: pkg deinstall fails with "argument list too long"

On 2012-08-27 20:03, Stefan Esser wrote: > PKG_NG seems to have introduced a limit on the size of ports that can be > deinstalled: > > # cd /usr/ports/math/lapack > # make deinstall > ===> Deinstalling for math/lapack > ===> Deinstalling lapack-3.4.0_2 > The following packages will be deinstal

Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation...

On 2012-08-23 21:50, Kris Moore wrote: > On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore wrote: >>> On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of /var/db/pkg as a packag

Re: pkg(ng)/portupgrade-devel: does not respect setting of USE_GCC= 4.6+

On 2012-08-20 19:57, O. Hartmann wrote: > I utilize FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and build the OS with CLANG as well as > ports, which are compatible building with clang, using the well known > settings in /etc/make.conf and /etc/src/conf. > > I use ports-mgmt/pkg (1.0-r6) and recently in combination with

Re: Port Request - FrontAccounting

On 2012-08-19 12:28, Alan Hicks wrote: > Hi > > On 19/08/2012 03:46, Janketh Jay wrote: > Or not. It appears the attachment was lost. You can download the > .tar.gz file from the following URL: > > http://www.purplehat.org/downloads/frontaccounting/frontaccounting-2.3.11-fbsd-port.tar.gz > > Ext

Re: vlc 2.0.3 ProjectM path fix

... >> I think I got it: It is only a problem of configuring in the running >> vlc. You have to set the right path under >> 'Settings','All','Audio','Visualizing','projectM'. That's all ;-) >> > Aah-haah! :) I've fixed the default paths and made a new patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/

HEADS up, apache20 and apr0 will be removed on 2012-08-18

HEADS up, apache20 and apr0 will be removed on 2012-08-18 -- olli ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Questions about/issues with new OPTIONS framework

On 2012-08-07 21:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:43:18PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-08-06 18:04, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >>> (Please keep me CC'd, as I'm not subscribed to the list) >>> >>> I've been tryin

Re: Questions about/issues with new OPTIONS framework

On 2012-08-06 18:04, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > (Please keep me CC'd, as I'm not subscribed to the list) > > I've been trying to adapt my /etc/make.conf to make use of the new > OPTIONS framework. I've run into some snags that I was hoping someone > could help me with, as I'm unable to find any "of

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

On 2012-07-27 11:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:41:10PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: >> >> Jase Thew wrote: >> > On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > > because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific >> is the >> > > options file.

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

On 2012-07-26 06:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: >>>> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wro

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

On 2012-07-26 00:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme >>> wrote: >> >> The following diff will restore th

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme > wrote: The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and command params have priority. (Place the make.conf part after the OPTIONS_FILE_SET part) Until now I cannot see why the OPTIONS f

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme > wrote: >> >> I also tried the other settings you suggested, and none >> of them works. It's always overridden by the settings >> that are stored in $PORT_DBDIR. >> >> With the old framework, I could over

Re: lang/php53 dumps core

On 2012-07-23 20:15, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Steven Hartland wrote: >> Silly question did you build with LINKTHR enabled? >> >> If not try with it enabled as a number of common modules >> require it and result in random crashes without it. > > Long time default for me. I don't remember correct

options NG and slave/sub ports

Scratching my head how to do this with options NG. Given one port and x sub ports. The main port defines: OPTIONS_DEFINE+=OPT1 OPT2 OPTIONS_SINGLE= TEST OPTIONS_SINGLE_TEST=MAIN SUB1 SUB2 SUB3 SUB4 ... OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= MAIN Slave1 has to overwrite MAIN and SUBx optio

Re: mariadb-client-5.3.7 marked broken?

On 2012-07-21 07:54, Mark Costlow wrote: > Hello. I have a machine with mariadb-{client,server}-5.2.6 installed, and > would like to upgrade to the latest 5.3.x version. However, mariadb-client > appears to be broken: > > ** Port marked as IGNORE: databases/mariadb-client: > is marked as b

Re: merge apache22 MPM modules on make config

On 2012-07-16 23:58, Marcello Coutinho wrote: > Hi, > > I was having issues with pbi builds and apache22-worker-mpm(It was always > looking at apache22 build instead of apache22-worker-mpm) > > After unifying all apache22-xx-mpm options on apache22 make config, I could > compile any MPM option us

Re: optionsng and tinderbox?

On 2012-06-23 11:23, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 23/06/2012 09:18, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Well the priority ordering the logical was to give the end word to the last >> user >> action. >> >> It goes from global to specific >> >> 1/ the global options (infrastructures) are applied >> 2/ the ma

Re: optionsng and tinderbox?

On 2012-06-23 10:18, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 06:14:00PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 06/22/2012 10:44, Olli Hauer wrote: >>> On 2012-06-21 11:26, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: >>>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:28:26 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote &g

Re: optionsng and tinderbox?

On 2012-06-21 11:26, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:28:26 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote > > Hi Matthew, Baptiste, > > Thank you very much for your answers. > > With your patch, Matthew, setting : > > openldap24-client_SET+=FETCH > > in make.conf now works for net/openldap24-cli

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

On 2012-06-16 22:36, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 20:11, Olli Hauer wrote: >> With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and >> foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run. >> >> With the ports infrastructure we have to run sev

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

On 2012-06-16 17:49, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain >> name. > > That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create > sub-packages. As I understand it, you'

Re: ports registering services in /etc/services and services_mkdb

On 2012-06-07 16:46, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/07/2012 07:37 AM, Olli Hauer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> during an update to 8.3 I notice mergemaster from 8.3 is >> building a database from /etc/services with services_mkdb. >> >> However the ports framework does

ports registering services in /etc/services and services_mkdb

Hi, during an update to 8.3 I notice mergemaster from 8.3 is building a database from /etc/services with services_mkdb. However the ports framework does not provide an automation to rebuild this database, even I haven't seen any port which triggers a rebuild. So my questions: - should ports take

Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54

On 2012-05-29 19:06, Doug Barton wrote: > On 5/29/2012 4:00 AM, Mel Flynn wrote: >> On 29-5-2012 7:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 5/21/2012 9:40 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I think that the best will be to not have any default "php5" port and just use php52, php53, php54, php5X, php60... a

Re: ATmail Port not working?

On 2012-05-27 17:47, Kaya Saman wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently in the process of testing ATmail as a replacement to my > currently running old Zimbra setup. > I would like to get rid of Linux and migrate my mail system onto FreeBSD. :) > However, for some reason the ATmail port isn't working

Re: Master Site problem

On 2012-03-27 19:15, Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 March 2012 17:12, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-03-27 18:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: >>> I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. You can >>> find it here: >>> <http://search.cpan.org/

Re: Master Site problem

On 2012-03-27 18:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. You can find > it here: > > I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will download. > Hopefully

Re: new port request

On 2012-03-27 17:35, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > Translation... > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:56:30PM -0400, AN wrote: > > I would like this to be a port > >> I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. I >> am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. >>

Re: new port request

On 2012-03-26 20:56, AN wrote: > I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. I am > not a developer or I would try to do it myself. > > Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 > www.mediafire.com/?sx7on7xjuowncl3 > > It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning netw

Re: FreeBSD 6.4 stable

On 2012-03-25 20:26, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I just re-animated an my old FreeBSD server but have some serious issues with > updating my ports collection: > > fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2: Not Found > *** Error code 1 > > I already tried: > portupgrade make fetchindex > portupg

Re: Porting OpenVAS 5.0 (BETA) - Current state?

On 2012-03-12 16:51, Frank Wall wrote: > Hi olli, > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:00:42PM +0100, olli hauer wrote: >> I tried a to port OPenVAS 4 last year but give up because >> of to many linuxisms in the codebase. >> (special for detecting network settings, interf

Re: Porting OpenVAS 5.0 (BETA) - Current state?

On 2012-03-12 14:30, Frank Wall wrote: > Hi, > > is anyone working on porting OpenVAS 5 to FreeBSD or has > anyone tried to do it in the past? Any known problems, > caveats or linuxisms? > > I've seen some posts about a year ago regarding OpenVAS 4, > but it seems nothing has happended since the

Re: Problem with genplist replacing PORTVERSION

On 2012-03-06 21:51, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Olli Hauer wrote: > >> On 2012-03-06 21:30, Helmut Schneider wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> To create a new version of a port (let's say typo3) I copy typo3 to >>> typo3.org. Then I run >>> &g

Re: Problem with genplist replacing PORTVERSION

On 2012-03-06 21:30, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > To create a new version of a port (let's say typo3) I copy typo3 to > typo3.org. Then I run > > sudo make clean && sudo port fetch > sudo rm -r /tmp/typo3* > sudo genplist clean; sudo genplist create /tmp/ > > As a result on my 8.2 machine $

Re: Apache/web ports advice in TPH

On 2012-02-06 01:57, Doug Barton wrote: > Howdy, > > This section: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/using-php.html > > is out of date, as the very first bit mentions a bunch of old apache > stuff. I'm happy to help update it if someone can say authoritatively >

Re: Any common policy against conflicting choice in Makefile OPTIONS?

On 2012-02-05 18:41, Chris Rees wrote: > On 5 February 2012 17:37, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-02-05 18:23, Chris Rees wrote: >>> On 5 February 2012 17:21, Olli Hauer wrote: >>>> On 2012-02-05 17:19, RyōTa SimaMoto wrote: >>>>> Hi, I'm a p

Re: Any common policy against conflicting choice in Makefile OPTIONS?

On 2012-02-05 18:23, Chris Rees wrote: > On 5 February 2012 17:21, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-02-05 17:19, RyōTa SimaMoto wrote: >>> Hi, I'm a port maintainer for multimedia/qmmp, and some ports. >>> Before upgrading QMMP port, may I ask what is the common

Re: Any common policy against conflicting choice in Makefile OPTIONS?

On 2012-02-05 17:19, RyōTa SimaMoto wrote: > Hi, I'm a port maintainer for multimedia/qmmp, and some ports. > Before upgrading QMMP port, may I ask what is the common policy how to > offer Makefile OPTIONS containing a certain contradictory pair? > > Actually the latest version of QMMP supports se

Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right?

On 2012-01-22 15:12, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. >> >> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500 >>> Michael Scheidell articulated: >>> I reached

Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right?

On 2012-01-21 21:12, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him there was a > lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more that would, if just > VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix some device drivers). > > He asked "how

Re: archivers/zip in 9.x:

On 2012-01-09 23:39, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 1/9/12 5:36 PM, Olli Hauer wrote: >> Don't worry, I believe you will do the right thing ;) >> ( Chris just confirmed that tar can extract zip files also on 7.4 and he use >> this in games/ioquake3) >>

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.3.8

On 2012-01-09 23:31, Mark Felder wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:52:19 -0600, wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I'm trying to migrate from REDHAT EL world to FREEBSD. We have a policy of >> installing binary packages and stay away from compiling source code. >> I have FreeBSD-9.0RC3 and I did pkg_add -r a

Re: archivers/zip in 9.x:

On 2012-01-09 23:18, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 1/9/12 4:46 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> Have at the moment no 7.x machine handy but zip files can be handled by tar, >> at last here on a 8.2 machine and I have no unzip installed. > > hey, don't confuse me. &g

Re: archivers/zip in 9.x:

On 2012-01-09 22:23, Greg Larkin wrote: > On 1/9/12 4:14 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > >> On 1/9/12 4:10 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >>> >>> .if exists(/usr/bin/unzip) >>> UNZIP_CMD?=/usr/bin/unzip >>> .else >>> UNZIP_CMD?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip >>> .endif >>> >>> in bsd.com

Re: opendkim-2.4.2 missing files

On 2012-01-09 21:17, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:04:25PM +0100, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-01-09 18:23, Paul Macdonald wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Just in case this isn't a known issue.. >>> >>> cheers &

Re: opendkim-2.4.2 missing files

On 2012-01-09 18:23, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > Hi, > > Just in case this isn't a known issue.. > > cheers > Paul. > > ---> Upgrading 'opendkim-2.4.1' to 'opendkim-2.4.2' (mail/opendkim) > ---> Building '/usr/ports/mail/opendkim' [...] > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > =>

Re: Gimp Plugin als Port?

On 2012-01-06 21:26, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Hey, > > ich hasse die "herkömmliche" art Software zu installieren. > > ./configure > make > sudo make install > > > Grausig - das hinterget jeden Paketmanager. > > Ich brauche gerade ein Gimp Plugin - es nennt sich Exifviewer: > > http://registr

Re: How to detect the version of a installed perl module during portbuild

On 2012-01-03 21:52, Olli Hauer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm searching a solution to detect the version of p5-JSON-RPC during build > time. > > JSON-RPC-1.01 is *not* backward compatible to 0.96 so I have to apply a fix > to the port only if JSON-RPC > 0.96 is

How to detect the version of a installed perl module during portbuild

Hi, I'm searching a solution to detect the version of p5-JSON-RPC during build time. JSON-RPC-1.01 is *not* backward compatible to 0.96 so I have to apply a fix to the port only if JSON-RPC > 0.96 is installed. >From http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/DMAKI/JSON-RPC-1.01/Changes 1.00_01 2011 Nov

Re: pear does not install; segfault/core dump Error code 139

On 2011-12-26 21:27, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 21:09:12 +0100, Olli Hauer wrote: > >> On 2011-12-26 20:15, Sahil Tandon wrote: >>> I ran into this problem when rebuilding all the ports (via portmaster) >>> on my system. Is there a known fix for t

Re: pear does not install; segfault/core dump Error code 139

On 2011-12-26 20:15, Sahil Tandon wrote: > I ran into this problem when rebuilding all the ports (via portmaster) > on my system. Is there a known fix for this issue? I saw ports/157958, > but do not understand the comments mentioned in closing the PR. > > [ ... ] > Deprecated: Function set_m

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 2011-11-16 10:28, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> >>> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: >>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently differ

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

On 2011-11-15 10:45, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > 1) The problem is not amd64 specific > > 2) No point unmarking BROKEN, it currently fails on i386 pointyhat nodes > too > > 3) Diagnosis is hard because the postfix-install shell script prints no > useful progress messages > > Example failure log: > ht

Re: MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE: how do *you* handle it?

On 2011-08-29 04:05, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > I'm wondering how other ports maintainers are dealing with their > definitions of MASTER_SITES=, DISTFILES=, DISTNAME=, etc. with regards > to Sourceforge. > > In browsing a number of projects recently on Sourceforge, I've noticed > that the paths t

[HEADS UP] apache22 will be become the default apache version during the next days!

Just a short reminder. We will switch the default apache version during the next days to from apache13 to apache22. apache13 will stay in the portstree for the next months, but will be removed before end of this year! Users who will stay for this time with apache13 should create the following

Re: FreeBSD Port: postfix-2.8.4,1

On 2011-08-01 23:31, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2011-08-01 22:54, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> Olli Hauer wrote: >>> On 2011-08-01 12:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I >>>

Re: FreeBSD Port: postfix-2.8.4,1

On 2011-08-01 22:54, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2011-08-01 12:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I >>> realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group

Re: FreeBSD Port: postfix-2.8.4,1

On 2011-08-01 12:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Hi, > I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I > realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group > (maildirs:*:3125:postfix). I use this setting for many years without > problem. > > After the change to "use t

Re: security/{nmap,zenmap} consolodation

On 2011-07-04 23:20, Chris Rees wrote: > On 4 Jul 2011 21:47, "Eitan Adler" wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jason Hellenthal > wrote: >>> >>> Hi ohauer@ >>> >>> I was curious if you would be intnerested in consolidating >>> security/zenmap into security/nmap with the options framewo

Re: security/{nmap,zenmap} consolodation

On 2011-07-04 16:48, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > Hi ohauer@ > > I was curious if you would be intnerested in consolidating > security/zenmap into security/nmap with the options framework and > deprecating security/zenmap since it continually falls pretty far behind > newer versions of nmap in por

Re: Opinions on additional small subversion bsd.svn.mk framework

On 2011-07-03 23:25, Florent Thoumie wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Olli Hauer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to hear your opinion on a new subversion helper framework >> >> [...] > > Hey Olli, > > I think that fixing the loose dependency on s

Re: Opinions sought on location of bsd.octave.mk

On 2011-07-03 20:56, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I am the maintainer of the octave-forge ports. These all use a file called > bsd.octave.mk. > > Currently this is located in Mk. But I have noticed that many ports have > their > bsd.*.mk files in one of their ports. For example, bsd.mesal

Opinions on additional small subversion bsd.svn.mk framework

Hi, I want to hear your opinion on a new subversion helper framework So you would first ask why a helper for subversion? My main reason to write such an helper was I use subversion-freebsd and only a view ports honor this in tinderbox. So I started writing for all those (80+) ports patches, and

Re: sudo always_set_home permanently set?

On 2011-06-30 22:28, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > I'm having an issue with the sudo port.. always_set_home seems to be on by > default (contrary to the documentation), and I can't get it to turn off. I > don't see any patches related to this in the port's files directory, so I'm > at a loss as

Re: autotools issue maybe someone has a hint

On 2011-06-29 05:29, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 29.06.2011 00:17, schrieb Olli Hauer: >> Hi maybe someone has a hint for an issue with autotools. >> >> On a amd64 system I run into the following issue on a port. >> >> 5 times "$> make clean configure"

Re: www/apache22 - default APACHE_PORT for 8.3/9.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-28 03:40, Steve Wills wrote: > On 03/17/11 22:35, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> All, > >> apache@ has been working diligently for the last 2yrs to realize >> www/apache22 as the default. Now, we are at last nearing completion. We >> look to

autotools issue maybe someone has a hint

Hi maybe someone has a hint for an issue with autotools. On a amd64 system I run into the following issue on a port. 5 times "$> make clean configure" => 3 times fail => 2 times success The interesting part between fail and success on the system self and in tinderbox. --- _fail/httpd-2.2.1

Re: php5-5.3.6_1 with Segmentation fault (amd64)

On 2011-06-28 20:10, Florian Smeets wrote: > On 28.06.11 19:49, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2011-06-28 18:53, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa wrote: >>> Hey list ! >>> >>> exist some trouble with php and amd64 ? (last php from ports) >>> >>> >&g

Re: php5-5.3.6_1 with Segmentation fault (amd64)

On 2011-06-28 18:53, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa wrote: > Hey list ! > > exist some trouble with php and amd64 ? (last php from ports) > > > [root@gringo] ~# pkg_info | grep php5-5 > php5-5.3.6_1PHP Scripting Language > [root@gringo] ~# php -v > Segmentation fault > [root@gringo] ~# php-fpm -h

Re: ports/157868: mail/mailman: Possible problem with MAIL_GID

On 2011-06-27 23:13, Adam McDougall wrote: > On 06/20/11 07:00, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 20 June 2011 11:10, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:30:58AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 20 June 2011 10:22, Guido Falsi wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:57:47PM +, Chris Rees

Re: Mailman + postfix <-- which group have people selected?

On 2011-06-14 20:43, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > Before I say anything else, please _do not_ bother wxs@ on this > subject -- any problems to do with ownership/groups in mailman should > be sent to me-- it's my mess! > > I fixed mailman recently to not touch PREFIX before the install phase, >

Re: I could sure use a way around the strange error I get when trying to update devel/apr on 7.4-STABLE FreeBSD

On 2011-05-24 17:56, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: > The compile finishes during configuration with: > > checking for minix/config.h... no > checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes > checking for library containing strerror... none required > checking whether system uses EBCDIC... no

Re: pint/cups-base?

On 2011-05-24 00:15, Bruce Meier wrote: > Chris Rees wrote: >> On 23 May 2011 21:12, Bruce Meier wrote: >> >>> When will the pint/cups-base port be upgraded? It has been marked "IGNORE" >>> for a long time now. >>> Thanks >>> >> > From /usr/ports/print/cups-base: >> >> .if defined(WITH_X

Re: Issue with apr1 on up to date freebsd stable

On 2011-05-19 19:51, eculp wrote: > Quoting eculp : > >> Quoting Olli Hauer : >> >>> On 2011-05-18 20:57, eculp wrote: >>>> Quoting eculp : >>>> >>>>> For a couple of days I have not been able to upgrade apr1. It dies with &g

Re: Issue with apr1 on up to date freebsd stable

On 2011-05-18 20:57, eculp wrote: > Quoting eculp : > >> For a couple of days I have not been able to upgrade apr1. It dies with >> libtool that I've also rebuilt. >> >> checking for minix/config.h... no >> checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes >> checking for library contai

Re: Complicated patching

On 2011-05-18 00:23, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > On 2011/05/17, at 18:07, Olli Hauer wrote: > >> there is a way, sample ports: >> dns/djbdns, dns/bind94, mail/postfix (VDA patches) and many more > > Thanks for the examples. I'll dig through those and see what I

Re: Complicated patching

On 2011-05-17 06:32, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > Hi. > > In a (possibly foolish) attempt to add a third-party patch to an application > I use *without* abandoning the ports tree for this app, I'm trying to make a > local modification to the port to download and include the patch in the build > pr

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/apr1 (1.4.4 breaks apache22)

On 2011-05-17 23:04, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 22:54 +0200, olli hauer wrote: > > >> Hi Mike, >> >> can you give some more details about your APR configuration? >> >> $> cd devel/apr1 >> $> make showconfig >> >>

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/apr1 (1.4.4 breaks apache22)

On 2011-05-17 21:12, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 22:51 +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > >> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 02:17:29PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I just updated my apache22 from 2.2.17 to 2.2.18, this update also >>> updated apr1 from 1.4.2 to 1.4.4. After rest

Re: Compiling tomcat-native barfs

On 2011-05-16 21:04, Christer Solskogen wrote: > loyal# make > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > ===> Extracting for tomcat-native-1.1.20_2 [...] > /usr/obj/usr/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.4/libtool: Can't open > /usr/obj/usr/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.4/libtool: No

Re: proper use of bsd.port.options.mk

On 2011-05-16 21:11, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 May 2011 19:47, Warren Block wrote: >> >> Could you give an example? I looked, but nothing obvious jumped out. >> > > I think you (and ohauer) missed my followup with an example [1]. > > Chris > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@free

Re: proper use of bsd.port.options.mk

On 2011-05-16 19:23, Doug Barton wrote: > On 5/16/2011 3:23 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 16 May 2011 05:18, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 May 2011, Doug Barton wrote: >>> I'm confused (yeah, I know, nothing new about that). From ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk: # usage: #

Re: Propose new macro: INSTALL_CONF

On 2011-05-16 00:12, Chris Rees wrote: > On 15 May 2011 22:23, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2011-05-15 22:56, Chris Rees wrote: >>> On 14 May 2011 18:32, Chris Rees wrote: >>>> On 14 May 2011 16:39, Chris Rees wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >

Re: Propose new macro: INSTALL_CONF

On 2011-05-15 22:56, Chris Rees wrote: > On 14 May 2011 18:32, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 14 May 2011 16:39, Chris Rees wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm getting frustrated with editing config files of ports in vi, and >>> being told it's read-only. >>> >>> This stops me using ZZ to quit, which makes m

Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO?

On 2011-04-27 16:12, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:48:36 +0200 > Erik Trulsson articulated: > >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:50:52 -0400 >>> >>> However, I do find troubling you statement regarding a large update >>> to an older port o

Re: saving a few ports from death

On 2011-04-27 17:59, Mikhail T. wrote: > On -10.01.-28163 14:59, Robert Huff wrote: >> It is also possible it is only important to a fairly small >> number ... but to those it is absolutely crucial. > Or the port might become useful/essential/critical to somebody in the > future... > > What i

Re: Best way to uninstall X

On 2011-04-07 20:36, Attos wrote: > I used to have remote access through VPN-VNC using IceWM to this machine, > but I no longer require this. > This machine has Apache, MySQL, PostFix, Samba. And now (port-)upgrading it > has become a PITA. > It's currently running 7.4-REL and I'm planning to upgra

Re: Best way to uninstall X

On 2011-04-07 18:59, Attos wrote: > Hello all, > > What is the best way to uninstall X and all the applications that run under > X? > > Thanks in advance. Don't know what else you have installed but pkg_delete -r can be useful here. $> pkg_info | grep -i ^x xorg-7.5.1 bla bla ... ... $> pkg_d

Re: [SOLVED] PORTDOCS strangeness

On 2011-03-31 23:25, Pan Tsu wrote: > Chris Rees writes: ... > + @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR} > + @${TAR} cf - -C${WRKSRC}/doc . | ${TAR} xof - -C${DOCSDIR} > Please use the preferred ${COPYTREE_SHARE} instead of ${TAR} -@${TAR} cf - -C${WRKSRC}/doc . | ${TAR} xof - -C${DOCSDIR} +@(cd ${WRKS

Re: MOVED entry needed for www/p5-Apache2-Scorebord

On 2011-02-06 15:58, Dan Langille wrote: > According to http://www.freshports.org/www/p5-Apache2-Scorebord, this port was > repo copied to http://www.freshports.org/www/p5-Apache2-Scoreboard on 17 Jun > 2005 12:10:08 > > (change of name from Scorebord to Scoreboard) > > There is no such entry in

Re: What's going on with the SF macro?

On 2011-01-24 20:15, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/24/2011 03:13, Sunpoet Hsieh wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> I suggest you to remove and checkout ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk again. >> I've made a test on ports/net-p2p/qbittorrent-26/Makefile by changing >> PORTVERSION from 2.6.3 to 2.6.4 and removing BROKEN. >>

<    1   2   3   4   >