2011/3/29 Buganini bugan...@gmail.com:
Here on my computer,
ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib
is required to load pyuno in a python script.
though, unoconv is still is not working..
Thanks,
Buganini
I have nothing to test pyuno, do you have a sample to send me?
concerning
Here on my computer,
ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib
is required to load pyuno in a python script.
though, unoconv is still is not working..
Thanks,
Buganini
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
on 29/01/2011 17:36 Gary Jennejohn said the following:
After the second complaint about an input error with flex I gave up.
The suggested remedy didn't work the second time. Here's the reported
error:
Compiling: MenuMultipleChange.idl
input in flex scanner failed
Please see if commit
2011/2/3 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com:
Chip Camden writes:
Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet?
I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday.
Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO.
After minimal testing, it appears
Quoth Olivier Smedts on Friday, 04 February 2011:
2011/2/3 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com:
Chip Camden writes:
Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet?
I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday.
Subjectively, building seemed tyo go
Olivier Smedts writes:
Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet?
I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday.
Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO.
After minimal testing, it appears to behave correctly.
There is a final bug in the package list
when you define in the options (make config) gnome=yes
the pkg-plist builds the +CONTENTS with a / in front of the gnome file
list
Solution:
edit the pkg-plist and remove the first / from the GNOMEOPT at line
1791, 1792
make reinstall package,
and the
Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com
écrivait :
It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase
still filled up my /tmp drive, so I had to umount /tmp, create a symbolic
link to /usr/tmp, and then it installed OK. My usual /tmp
Quoth Thierry Thomas on Friday, 04 February 2011:
Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com
écrivait :
It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase
still filled up my /tmp drive, so I had to umount /tmp, create a symbolic
link
Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org writes:
Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com
écrivait :
It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase
still filled up my /tmp drive, so I had to umount /tmp, create a symbolic
link to
On Fri 04 Feb 2011 at 10:58:28 PST Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org writes:
Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com
écrivait :
It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase
still filled up my /tmp drive, so
On 02/04/2011 08:55, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
There is a final bug in the package list
when you define in the options (make config) gnome=yes
the pkg-plist builds the +CONTENTS with a / in front of the gnome file
list
Solution:
edit the pkg-plist and remove the first / from the GNOMEOPT
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
your built is failing because you ran it twice.
make can't be run twice you should make clean before
Doesn't this point to a bug in the Makefile, dependencies, etc?
Last I knew the whole point of make was to build what needs to
be built, skipping any
2011/2/3 per...@pluto.rain.com:
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
your built is failing because you ran it twice.
make can't be run twice you should make clean before
Doesn't this point to a bug in the Makefile, dependencies, etc?
Last I knew the whole point of make was to build
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/2/3 per...@pluto.rain.com:
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
your built is failing because you ran it twice.
make can't be run twice you should make clean before
Doesn't this point to a bug in
2011/2/3 Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/2/3 per...@pluto.rain.com:
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
your built is failing because you ran it twice.
make can't be run twice you should make
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:04:23 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
counts 178 missing files.
19 have x86_64 in their paths. These directories do not exist
2011/2/3 Max Brazhnikov m...@issp.ac.ru:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:04:23 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
counts 178 missing files.
19 have x86_64 in
Quoth Max Brazhnikov on Thursday, 03 February 2011:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:04:23 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
counts 178 missing files.
19
Chip Camden writes:
Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet?
I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday.
Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO.
After minimal testing, it appears to behave correctly.
Are you the installed libtextcat is the latest version ?
regards,
Bapt
no libtextcat was not installed, after installing this.. it built fine and
everything works.
should libtextcat not be a dependency so that it gets built even if I don't
have it installed?
--
Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman
2011/2/3 Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com:
Are you the installed libtextcat is the latest version ?
regards,
Bapt
no libtextcat was not installed, after installing this.. it built fine and
everything works.
should libtextcat not be a dependency so that it gets built even if I don't
2011/2/2 Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com:
nice thank you very much for the tests now it is in the ports tree.
I am using FreeBSD 9-CURRENT amd64 and a fresh ports tree
my build is failing, what can i do?
sw deliver
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 281 files
nice thank you very much for the tests now it is in the ports tree.
I am using FreeBSD 9-CURRENT amd64 and a fresh ports tree
my build is failing, what can i do?
sw deliver
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 281 files unchanged
Hello, another build failure here :)
amd64, 9.0-current, building from ports.
# make showconfig
=== The following configuration options are available for libreoffice-3.3.0:
WEBDAV=off Support webdav protocol
CUPS=off Support cups for printing
KDE4=on With Qt4/KDE4 vclplug support
2011/2/2 George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.com:
Hello, another build failure here :)
amd64, 9.0-current, building from ports.
# make showconfig
=== The following configuration options are available for libreoffice-3.3.0:
WEBDAV=off Support webdav protocol
CUPS=off Support cups for
On Wednesday February 2 2011 05:50:52 George Liaskos wrote:
Hello, another build failure here :)
First, thank you very much for the LibreOffice. I installed it from the ports
and it works perfect and faster on my system then OO whch I deinstalled :).
What doesn't work for now is just systray
2011/2/2 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday February 2 2011 05:50:52 George Liaskos wrote:
Hello, another build failure here :)
First, thank you very much for the LibreOffice. I installed it from the ports
and it works perfect and faster on my system then OO whch I deinstalled :).
What
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:21:21 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/2/2 George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.com:
Hello, another build failure here :)
amd64, 9.0-current, building from ports.
# make showconfig
=== The following configuration options are available for
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
by default it builds
2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/2/2 Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com:
nice thank you very much for the tests now it is in the ports tree.
I am using FreeBSD 9-CURRENT amd64 and a fresh ports tree
my build is failing, what can i do?
2011/2/2 Steve Randall srandal...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all
I ported
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:57:47 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/2 Steve Randall srandal...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 28
I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
counts 178 missing files.
19 have x86_64 in their paths. These directories do not exist on my
system, but I have directories with x86 in the names
2011/2/1 Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com:
Broken
checking whether to enable debugging code... product
checking whether to use git to get the ooo sources... git: not found
/work/a/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4/clone
already set up
checking for rsync... no
configure:
Quoth Chip Camden on Monday, 31 January 2011:
Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Monday, 31 January 2011:
Thanks all for the testing, sorry I wasn't able to be reactive this WE
(because of my ISP).
Anyway the git has version been improved to address most of the
problem you reported. I'm doing
28.01.2011 17:06, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
I'm late.
Just build it succesfully on 8-stable i386 from
2011/2/2 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru:
28.01.2011 17:06, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
I'm late.
2011/2/2 Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com:
Hi bapt,
Following port built fine on my tinderbox (8.1-RELEASE/amd64)
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/commit/
author Baptiste Daroussin 2011-02-01 20:13:50 (UTC)
committer Baptiste Daroussin 2011-02-01 20:13:50 (UTC)
commit
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Subject: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a
pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30
with java)
Strange
Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Monday, 31 January 2011:
Thanks all for the testing, sorry I wasn't able to be reactive this WE
(because of my ISP).
Anyway the git has version been improved to address most of the
problem you reported. I'm doing some testing on it but the library
path issue
report in the upstream.
Thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:31:04 +0900 (JST)
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Subject: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Fri, 28 Jan
2011/2/1 Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com:
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Subject: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a
pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:35:00 +
I do not use ccache or anything like that. here a full bundle
libraries took about 4 hours for OpenOffice.org.
No I don't use it either.
that mean my box
replace '==' to '=' in configure script.
Please report in the upstream.
Thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:31:04 +0900 (JST)
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Subject: [CFT] cpu
From: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:44:34 +
bash is used more deeply, and people are working on removing it.
thanks for your testing, git (http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/)
version has been greatly
ok I'll test
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/snapshot/ports-master.tar.gz
author Baptiste Daroussin 2011-01-31 22:42:54 (UTC)
committerBaptiste Daroussin2011-01-31 22:42:54 (UTC)
commit 4e9cbb9b2c56efb6179785cafe224968ade4833e (patch)
tree
for libreoffice when using
--with-git
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
bit strange you need rsync when building libreoffice
From: Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:52:21 +0900 (JST)
ok I'll test
http
Hi bapt,
you may want to add following line.
DIST_SUBDIR=libreoffice
spamming many distfiles at /usr/ports/distifiles/
might not be a good idea.
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:47
I've run same issue with making lingucomponent. Besides that, i've seen
following errors during build:
usr/bin/ld: warning: libcomphelp4gcc3.so, needed by ../../
unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
../../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so: undefined reference to
I've run same issue with making lingucomponent. Besides that, i've seen
following errors during build:
usr/bin/ld: warning: libcomphelp4gcc3.so, needed by ../../
unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
../../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so: undefined reference to
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:03:27 +0800
Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:02:24AM -0600, Steve Randall wrote:
snip
I also added FreeBSD to the script, and now it works perfectly. I can
open, edit, and save documents without problems.
The script for printer
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:01:13 -0800
Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
It failed at this point:
Compiling: rsc_sw
sw deliver
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 281 files copied, 0 files unchanged
---
Oh dear
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
by default it builds without java.
В Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:36:05 +0100
Gary Jennejohn gljennj...@googlemail.com пишет:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
On Saturday 29 January 2011 16:02:24 Steve Randall wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:01:13 -0800
Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
It failed at this point:
Compiling: rsc_sw
sw deliver
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 281 files copied, 0 files unchanged
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:22:23PM +0100, Oliver Heesakkers thus spake:
On Saturday 29 January 2011 16:02:24 Steve Randall wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:01:13 -0800
Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
It failed at this point:
Compiling: rsc_sw
sw deliver
Module 'sw' delivered
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:02:24AM -0600, Steve Randall wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:01:13 -0800
Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
It failed at this point:
Compiling: rsc_sw
sw deliver
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 281 files copied, 0 files unchanged
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde and gnome
integration. (sorry but my poor CPU already hates
2011/1/28 René Ladan r...@freebsd.org:
2011/1/28 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
I'll fire up a build
2011/1/28 René Ladan r...@freebsd.org:
2011/1/28 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org:
2011/1/28 René Ladan r...@freebsd.org:
2011/1/28 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
2011/1/28 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org:
2011/1/28 René Ladan r...@freebsd.org:
2011/1/28 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
2011/1/28 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
I'll fire up a build on 9.0-amd64 with a clang-based
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
...
checking which mdds to
2011/1/28 Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net:
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:11:39PM +, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake:
2011/1/28 Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net:
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:11:39 +
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org пишет:
2011/1/28 Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net:
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Friday, 28 January 2011:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde
On Saturday 29 January 2011 00:09:24 Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Friday, 28 January 2011:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please
2011/1/28 Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com:
Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Friday, 28 January 2011:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
by
2011/1/28 Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:11:39PM +, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake:
2011/1/28 Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net:
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test it?
by default it builds without java. it only
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:09:24PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Friday, 28 January 2011:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you
2011/1/28 Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
Can you please test
2011/1/28 Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:09:24PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Baptiste Daroussin on Friday, 28 January 2011:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:22:18PM -0800, Jason Helfman thus spake:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:11:39PM +, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake:
2011/1/28 Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net:
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org пишет:
Hi all
I ported libreoffice 3.3.0,
2011/1/29 Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:22:18PM -0800, Jason Helfman thus spake:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:11:39PM +, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake:
2011/1/28 Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net:
В Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin
: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:10:26 +
2011/1/29 Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:22:18PM -0800, Jason Helfman thus spake:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:11:39PM +, Baptiste
: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:10:26 +
2011/1/29 Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:22:18PM -0800, Jason Helfman thus spake:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:11:39PM +, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake:
2011/1/28 Ivan Klymenko fi
81 matches
Mail list logo
