On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:56:47 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:05:14 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Is anyone interested in a list of ports that do not compile
under tmpfs?
Me.
The following are on my blacklist for tmpfs build, where:
# df -h |
David Naylor wrote:
On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:56:47 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:05:14 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Is anyone interested in a list of ports that do not compile
under tmpfs?
Me.
The following are on my
Hi David and *
thanks for your patch, I verified and committed.
Best,
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:39:42 +0300
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:26:01 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote:
From: Ion-Mihai
On Thursday 21 May 2009 13:56:46 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009 12:05:22 +0200, David Naylor wrote
The following ports failed to build on my system (with a quad core)
and FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set. They did success to build once I added
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to their Makefile's.
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:05:14 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Is anyone interested in a list of ports that do not compile
under tmpfs?
Me.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect
FreeBSD committer
thanks for raising as PR :)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135262
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/
Nakata Maho's PGP public keys: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
pgpOxw8vi6mZA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:25:35 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote:
thanks for raising as PR :)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135262
Some support has been committed by Pav, can you please check his commit
and adjust OOo ports to make use of it? This way I could have all OOo
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:38:18 +0300
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:25:35 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote:
thanks for raising as PR :)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135262
Some
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:26:01 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote:
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:38:18 +0300
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:25:35 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote:
thanks
2009/5/21 David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com:
Hi,
The following ports failed to build on my system (with a quad core) and
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set. They did success to build once I added
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to their Makefile's.
devel/nasm
graphics/libart_lgpl
lang/ocaml
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 23:23:16 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
David Naylor píše v út 26. 05. 2009 v 18:17 +0200:
What about the change that exposes MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER when MAKE_JOBS_SAFE
or FORCE_MAKE_JOBS are defined (to avoid using ${_MAKE_JOBS:C/-j//}, not
sure what the policy is of ports using
Hi David, I'll go to Canada for attending conference tomorrow.be back on 6/4.
see you
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/
Nakata Maho's PGP public keys: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
pgpVkDXepD1Ih.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 10:48:25 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
David Naylor píše v út 26. 05. 2009 v 08:19 +0200:
pav: ${_MAKE_JOBS:C/-j//} won't work with DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS (or
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE) since it needs to always be a positive number, secondly
it still cannot be used for conditional code
David Naylor píše v po 25. 05. 2009 v 10:11 +0200:
This part looks OK, I wonder if there's any reason t ain't like
this now; Pav?
-.if defined(MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER)
+MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER?= `${SYSCTL} -n kern.smp.cpus`
_MAKE_JOBS=
On Mon, 25 May 2009 10:03:12 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:37:45 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:26:23 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi I tested it
On Monday 25 May 2009 20:01:25 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009 10:03:12 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:37:45 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:26:23 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24
Hi David,
Thanks kudos for tough works and discussions!
David, is this the final patch which I should test?
Best,
From: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:47:29 +0200
On Monday 25 May 2009 20:01:25 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
Yes, you would need that. I believe that will be default.
2. with above patch, ooo2 doesn't launch parallele jobs.
I spotted that problem after
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:26:23 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
Yes, you would need that. I believe that will be default.
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of cores
This part looks OK, I wonder if there's any reason t ain't like this
now; Pav?
-.if defined(MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER)
+MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER?= `${SYSCTL} -n kern.smp.cpus`
On Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200
Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of
cores
This part looks OK, I wonder if there's any reason t ain't like this
now; Pav?
-.if
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 24. 05. 2009 v 19:01 +0300:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200
Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of
cores
This part looks OK, I
On Sunday 24 May 2009 18:27:57 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 24. 05. 2009 v 19:01 +0300:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200
Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:26:23 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
Yes, you would need that. I believe that will be default.
OOo issue. We should identify if dependencies are missing.
-devel ports can be unsafe but 3, 3-RC 2, 2-RC must be safe.
Please wait a few days to say ok.
Best,
From: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:01:56 +0200
a try during this weekend.
From: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:01:56 +0200
[ .. ]
Please see attached for the patch. The changes to bsd.port.mk:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER always defined
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER forced
On Saturday 23 May 2009 12:51:33 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:24:26 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote:
Please see attached for the patch. The changes to bsd.port.mk:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER always defined
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER forced to 1 if UNSAFE of DISABLE
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
2. with above patch, ooo2 doesn't launch parallele jobs.
3. ooo3, 3-rc, 3-devel are okay with patch 1.
thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/
Nakata Maho's PGP public keys:
-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 08:03:42 +0300
On Thu, 21 May 2009 12:05:22 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
P.P.S. editors/openoffice-3 does not obey MAKE_JOBS, it requires
MAXMODULES
Hi David,
From: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:24:30 +0200
On Friday 22 May 2009 07:11:19 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Dear,
I appriciate David or Ion-Mihai make a patch for that.
just seetting MAXMODULE=4
On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:53:50 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote:
In massive parallel build, OOo can be broken. We explicitly
fix them otherwise broken. I just test with MAXJOB = 4 or something
like that.
I had it complain about perl (or
something) needing to be recompiled but
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
I can run a few test builds on QAT and maybe Phillip can do the same on
his tindy. Just drop us the patch ;-)
Even if it only works with MAXJOB = 2, we mark it as such and the build
will be faster.
LOL. Do it once and I get volunteered.
Too funny. Sure I'm up for some
Hi,
The following ports failed to build on my system (with a quad core) and
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set. They did success to build once I added
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to their Makefile's.
devel/nasm
graphics/libart_lgpl
lang/ocaml
multimedia/mplayer
multimedia/smplayer
security/nss
Is there any
On Thu, 21 May 2009 12:05:22 +0200, David Naylor wrote
The following ports failed to build on my system (with a quad core)
and FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set. They did success to build once I added
MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to their Makefile's.
Marked in CVS, thank you!
Is there any effort to mark ports
On Thu, 21 May 2009 12:05:22 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
P.P.S. editors/openoffice-3 does not obey MAKE_JOBS, it requires
MAXMODULES and MAXPROCESSES set (should I file a PR?).
Anything reducing OOo build time would be great :-)
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD
Dear,
I appriciate David or Ion-Mihai make a patch for that.
just seetting MAXMODULE=4 and/or MAXPROCESSES=4 or something like that.
But note that sometimes it's broken :-( by missing dependencey.
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Fri
36 matches
Mail list logo
