On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:26:34AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
dave wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:20 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Correct. In fact, it possibly means the LICENSE ends up in the plist
twice, which is almost as bad as it not being mentioned at all.
Ok, I think I'm
David Fries wrote:
Hi everybody
I started working on my first port (a Haskell cabal package) over the
last weekend. I read the porter's handbook and then began by looking
at similar ports that already existed in the ports collection (e.g.
archivers/hs-zlib) to get a basic idea of what the
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:21 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
David Fries wrote:
Hi everybody
I started working on my first port (a Haskell cabal package) over the
last weekend. I read the porter's handbook and then began by looking
at similar ports that already existed in the ports
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:23:18PM +0100, dave wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:21 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
David Fries wrote:
Hi everybody
I started working on my first port (a Haskell cabal package) over the
last weekend. I read the porter's handbook and then began by looking
dave wrote:
After looking at the Makefile again, I noticed that the maintainer of
hs-zlib defined PORTDOCS= * . If I understand correctly, that means you
can put as many files in DOCSDIR as you want. The asterisk will match
everything and you always end up with everything registered in the
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, dave wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:20 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Correct. In fact, it possibly means the LICENSE ends up in the plist
twice, which is almost as bad as it not being mentioned at all.
Ok, I think I'm starting to get a hang of this. Personally, I
