On 12/02/2017 20:06, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
Andy Farkas skrev:
But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :(
Why do you use mplayer2 (instead of mplayer or mpv)?
Good question. I guess I was thinking that mplayer2 was one
better than mplayer.
And why is this port still in
Andy Farkas skrev:
>
> But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :(
Why do you use mplayer2 (instead of mplayer or mpv)?
And why is this port still in the tree?
* snapshot is from 2013-04-28
* github.com/mplayer2/mplayer2 is no longer updated
* http://git.mplayer2.org does not
On 12/02/2017 19:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
pkg has plenty of manpages all of which are specified in the "SEE
ALSO" section of pkg(8) which is a standardize section exactly made of
that.
The man page for pkg(8) does not explicitly state that the sub-commands
to pkg have their own man
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:43:57PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkas wrote:
>
> > On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
> >
> > It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete".
> >>
> >>
> > My proposal is
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Andy Farkas wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for
>> each pkg command.
>>
>
> Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed.
>
> Since
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for
> each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a
> POLA violation to not make it clear.
It does so on my system in
On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote:
First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for
each pkg command.
Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed.
Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a
POLA violation to not make it clear.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkas wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
> It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete".
>>
>>
> My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this.
>
> -andyf
First, the pkg(8)
On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete".
My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this.
-andyf
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:08:29 +1000
Andy Farkas wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote:
> >> The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8).
> >>
> > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page.
> >
>
> To be fair, the pkg(8) man
On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote:
The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8).
Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page.
To be fair, the pkg(8) man page does not mention that pkg(8) calls
sub-programmes like pkg-delete(8). The
On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote:
> The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8).
>
Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page.
Cheers,
Matthew
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/02/2017 08:37, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
Andy Farkas skrev:
I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to
devel/check.
(nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this)
But devel/check won't install because:
pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs
Andy Farkas skrev:
>
> I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to
> devel/check.
> (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this)
>
> But devel/check won't install because:
>
> pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs files
> into the same place).
14 matches
Mail list logo