Re: multimedia/mplayer2 (was Re: devel/check)

2017-02-12 Thread Andy Farkas
On 12/02/2017 20:06, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Andy Farkas skrev: But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :( Why do you use mplayer2 (instead of mplayer or mpv)? Good question. I guess I was thinking that mplayer2 was one better than mplayer. And why is this port still in

multimedia/mplayer2 (was Re: devel/check)

2017-02-12 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
Andy Farkas skrev: > > But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :( Why do you use mplayer2 (instead of mplayer or mpv)? And why is this port still in the tree? * snapshot is from 2013-04-28 * github.com/mplayer2/mplayer2 is no longer updated * http://git.mplayer2.org does not

Re: devel/check

2017-02-12 Thread Andy Farkas
On 12/02/2017 19:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: pkg has plenty of manpages all of which are specified in the "SEE ALSO" section of pkg(8) which is a standardize section exactly made of that. The man page for pkg(8) does not explicitly state that the sub-commands to pkg have their own man

Re: devel/check

2017-02-12 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:43:57PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkas wrote: > > > On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > > It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". > >> > >> > > My proposal is

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for >> each pkg command. >> > > Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed. > > Since

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for > each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a > POLA violation to not make it clear. It does so on my system in

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Andy Farkas
On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote: First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for each pkg command. Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a POLA violation to not make it clear.

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". >> >> > My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. > > -andyf First, the pkg(8)

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Andy Farkas
On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:08:29 +1000 Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > >> The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > >> > > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. > > > > To be fair, the pkg(8) man

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Andy Farkas
On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. To be fair, the pkg(8) man page does not mention that pkg(8) calls sub-programmes like pkg-delete(8). The

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. Cheers, Matthew signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Andy Farkas
On 12/02/2017 08:37, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Andy Farkas skrev: I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to devel/check. (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this) But devel/check won't install because: pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
Andy Farkas skrev: > > I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to > devel/check. > (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this) > > But devel/check won't install because: > > pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs files > into the same place).