/cmake/work/cmake-3.1.3/Source/cmGlobalGenerator.cxx:1906
#16 0x100224dc in cmCTest::Initialize (this=0xcf50,
binary_dir=0x51c890f8
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng-1.6.16, command=0x0)
at
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-3.1.3/Source
-3.1.3/Source/cmGlobalGenerator.cxx:1906
#16 0x100224dc in cmCTest::Initialize (this=0xcf50,
binary_dir=0x51c890f8
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng-1.6.16, command=0x0)
at
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-3.1.3/Source/cmCTest.cxx
#16 0x100224dc in cmCTest::Initialize (this=0xcf50,
binary_dir=0x51c890f8
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng-1.6.16, command=0x0)
at
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-3.1.3/Source/cmCTest.cxx:511
#17 0x1002c704 in cmCTest
in cmGlobalGenerator::CreateLocalGenerator
(this=0xc138) at
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-3.1.3/Source/cmGlobalGenerator.cxx:1906
#16 0x100224dc in cmCTest::Initialize (this=0xcf50,
binary_dir=0x51c890f8
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/graphics/png
::Initialize (this=0xcf50,
binary_dir=0x51c890f8
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng-1.6.16, command=0x0)
at
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-3.1.3/Source/cmCTest.cxx:511
#17 0x1002c704 in cmCTest::Run (this=0xcf50,
args
(this=0xc138) at
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/devel/cmake/work/cmake-3.1.3/Source/cmGlobalGenerator.cxx:1906
#16 0x100224dc in cmCTest::Initialize (this=0xcf50,
binary_dir=0x51c890f8
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng-1.6.16, command=0x0)
at
/usr
graphics/png has been failing like this for some time, and I would go around
the problem by fetching the newer binary then re-starting poudriere. That
trick did not work this time, so now I'm stuck.
Same error when building on host (non-poudriere). Port used to compile on
host, but no longer
On 2014-10-31 15:33, Beeblebrox wrote:
graphics/png has been failing like this for some time, and I would go
around
the problem by fetching the newer binary then re-starting poudriere.
That
trick did not work this time, so now I'm stuck.
Same error when building on host (non-poudriere). Port
from Chris Rees:
What new features are you trying to take advantage of with png?
I went to the libpng website and couldn't find the desired changelog, but found
libpng 1.4.x and 1.5.x were still in active development, and there was also a
beta 1.7.0 . 1.6.2 is the latest release.
I notice
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Thomas Mueller
mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
from Chris Rees:
What new features are you trying to take advantage of with png?
I went to the libpng website and couldn't find the desired changelog, but
found libpng 1.4.x and 1.5.x were still in active
from Dirk Meyer:
Hallo Thomas Mueller,
What is the status of graphics/png, now that FreeBSD 8.4_RC2 has been
released and the ports tree has been unfrozen?
Will it get the long overdue update to 1.6.x; how much regression testing
needs to be done?
1.6.1 ist still
On 26 Apr 2013 13:05, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
from Dirk Meyer:
Hallo Thomas Mueller,
What is the status of graphics/png, now that FreeBSD 8.4_RC2 has been
released and the ports tree has been unfrozen?
Will it get the long overdue update to 1.6.x; how much
What is the status of graphics/png?
I noticed NetBSD pkgsrc was prompt in updating to 1.6 (or was it 1.6.0?), even
though they are behind in some other packages.
I'm concerned with the prospect of having to rebuild all ports that depend on
png when 1.5.x - 1.6.
The status is that I wait
What is the status of graphics/png?
I noticed NetBSD pkgsrc was prompt in updating to 1.6 (or was it 1.6.0?), even
though they are behind in some other packages.
I'm concerned with the prospect of having to rebuild all ports that depend on
png when 1.5.x - 1.6.
Tom
On 02/22/13 12:22, Thomas Mueller wrote:
What is the status of graphics/png?
I noticed NetBSD pkgsrc was prompt in updating to 1.6 (or was it 1.6.0?), even
though they are behind in some other packages.
I'm concerned with the prospect of having to rebuild all ports that depend on png
when
I didn't realize the FreeBSD ports people would be so cautious with png.
[5810 eitan@radar ~ ]%grep png-1.5 -c /usr/ports/INDEX-10
6036
might help explain why. :)
Eitan Adler
I don't have INDEX-10, but ran
grep png-1.5 -c /BETA1/usr/ports/INDEX-9
and got 6032.
Does that mean so many
Hi!
I didn't realize the FreeBSD ports people would be so cautious with png.
[5810 eitan@radar ~ ]%grep png-1.5 -c /usr/ports/INDEX-10
6036
might help explain why. :)
Eitan Adler
I don't have INDEX-10, but ran
grep png-1.5 -c /BETA1/usr/ports/INDEX-9
and got 6032.
Does
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com
wrote:
From my original post:
I think graphics/png is at 1.5.12 in FreeBSD ports but 1.5.13?
Does anybody know when 1.5.13 will appear or if there is a particular snag?
Niclas Zeising zeis...@daemonic.se
On 15 October 2012 05:45, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com
wrote:
From my original post:
I think graphics/png is at 1.5.12 in FreeBSD ports but 1.5.13?
Does anybody know when 1.5.13 will appear
From my original post:
I think graphics/png is at 1.5.12 in FreeBSD ports but 1.5.13?
Does anybody know when 1.5.13 will appear or if there is a particular snag?
Niclas Zeising zeis...@daemonic.se responded:
Since we are in a feature freeze, and graphics/png is the dependency of
a lot
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
From my original post:
I think graphics/png is at 1.5.12 in FreeBSD ports but 1.5.13?
Does anybody know when 1.5.13 will appear or if there is a particular snag?
Niclas Zeising zeis...@daemonic.se responded
I think graphics/png is at 1.5.12 in FreeBSD ports but 1.5.13?
Does anybody know when 1.5.13 will appear or if there is a particular snag?
Tom
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On 2012-10-13 10:37, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I think graphics/png is at 1.5.12 in FreeBSD ports but 1.5.13?
Does anybody know when 1.5.13 will appear or if there is a particular snag?
Tom
Since we are in a feature freeze, and graphics/png is the dependency of
a lot of ports, I don't think
on 26/04/2012 11:55 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 07/03/2012 18:19 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 07/03/2012 14:11 b. f. said the following:
you can just
install lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 and set USE_GCC=4.6 in your build
environment, an included Makefile, or on the command line
on 07/03/2012 18:19 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 07/03/2012 14:11 b. f. said the following:
you can just
install lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 and set USE_GCC=4.6 in your build
environment, an included Makefile, or on the command line
And an additional problem with this recommendation is that
graphics/png in this way for years. You can and should
dispense with the libmap.conf additions, the hardcoded CC, CXX, and
CPP in make.conf, etc.
Thanks for your comments. I now tried this on the fresh 9.0-REL system I
created, -- I cleared out make.conf, deleted libmap.conf. The problem
1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png.
vmboX#
Are you adding -fstack-protector to your CFLAGS?
b.
I dont have any special CFLAGS variables -- empty make.conf, no libmap.conf
file. Just using env USE_GCC=4.6 as I indicated in my
been
building graphics/png in this way for years. You can and should
dispense with the libmap.conf additions, the hardcoded CC, CXX, and
CPP in make.conf, etc.
Thanks for your comments. I now tried this on the fresh 9.0-REL system I
created, -- I cleared out make.conf, deleted libmap.conf
, an included Makefile, or on the command line. I have been
building graphics/png in this way for years. You can and should
dispense with the libmap.conf additions, the hardcoded CC, CXX, and
CPP in make.conf, etc.
Thanks for your comments. I now tried this on the fresh 9.0-REL system I
created
Adding dinoex (Maintainer of graphics/png).
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Gautam list at execve.net wrote:
Still didnt work for me -- did another buildworld and retried to check if
there was something else messed up.
I am moving back to base gcc for now. Waiting for redports
on 07/03/2012 14:11 b. f. said the following:
you can just
install lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 and set USE_GCC=4.6 in your build
environment, an included Makefile, or on the command line
BTW, our traditional taxonomy seems to be: USE_XXX is for stuff that ports
really require, WITH_XXX is for user
On 3/7/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 07/03/2012 14:11 b. f. said the following:
you can just
install lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 and set USE_GCC=4.6 in your build
environment, an included Makefile, or on the command line
BTW, our traditional taxonomy seems to be: USE_XXX is for
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 06:19:51PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
BTW, our traditional taxonomy seems to be: USE_XXX is for stuff that ports
really require, WITH_XXX is for user preferences.
This isn't a taxonomy suggestion, it's a documented requirement:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:11:52PM +, b. f. wrote:
The custom gcc article that you are attempting to use was written at
a time when some of the related port Makefiles had some shortcomings
that no longer exist, and is not the recommended way to use lang/gcc*
for ports.
Would you be
On 3/8/12, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:11:52PM +, b. f. wrote:
The custom gcc article that you are attempting to use was written at
a time when some of the related port Makefiles had some shortcomings
that no longer exist, and is not the recommended
Hi,
Adding dinoex (Maintainer of graphics/png).
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Gautam l...@execve.net wrote:
Still didnt work for me -- did another buildworld and retried to check if
there was something else messed up.
I am moving back to base gcc for now. Waiting for redports lang/gcc
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
To be precise, I'm user of lang/gcc46, but since long before lang/gcc
creation, so it shouldn't really matter.
Still didnt work for me -- did another buildworld and retried to check if
there was something else
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
make.conf:
.if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*)
WRKDIRPREFIX= /usr/obj
.include /etc/ports.conf
.endif
ports.conf:
CC=gcc46
CXX=g++46
CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -march=native
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
No such problem here.
I don't think so. Maybe it's P4 specific.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/graphics-png-does-not-build-with-lang-gcc-tp5495065p5515744.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd
/etc/libmap.conf
libgcc_s.so.1 gcc46/libgcc_s.so.1
libgomp.so.1gcc46/libgomp.so.1
libssp.so.0 gcc46/libssp.so.0
libstdc++.so.6 gcc46/libstdc++.so.6
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/graphics-png-does-not-build-with-lang-gcc-tp5495065p5515746.html
To be precise, I'm user of lang/gcc46, but since long before lang/gcc
creation, so it shouldn't really matter.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/graphics-png-does-not-build-with-lang-gcc-tp5495065p5515762.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive
make.conf:
.if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*)
WRKDIRPREFIX= /usr/obj
.include /etc/ports.conf
.endif
ports.conf:
CC=gcc46
CXX=g++46
CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -march=native
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
No such problem here.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/graphics-png-does
.3gcc46/libobjc.so.2
libssp.so.0 gcc46/libssp.so.0
libstdc++.so.6 gcc46/libstdc++.so.6
When I tried to rebuild some ports, I found a problem with linking
graphics/png.
I found a similar problem mentioned in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-June/062166.html
to
`__stack_chk_fail_local' follow
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
gcc46 -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=pentium4 -I.
-std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -L. -static -o pngtest pngtest.o -lpng -lz -lm
1 error
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png.
*** Error code 1
I'd like to see this option on by default now. I think, it's been available (off
by default) long enough and I, for one, always turn it on for completeness.
There used to be concerns about security of animated PNG code, but today I can
not find any advisories fresher than 2008:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:28:20PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
I'd like to see this option on by default now. I think, it's been available
(off
by default) long enough and I, for one, always turn it on for completeness.
There used to be concerns about security of animated PNG code, but today I
On 25.05.2011 15:02, Andrey Chernov wrote:
There used to be concerns about security of animated PNG code, but today I can
not find any advisories fresher than 2008:
http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/48766
Wrong place to find advisores related to subj. See
If only FF wants hacked library, there is no point to make even
separated port. Making APNG default is an additional security risk since
another vulnerability may be founded in the APNG extension in the future
will affect all programs at once, i.e. we'll have png risk + apng risk as
result.
On 25.05.2011 17:37, Andrey Chernov wrote:
If only FF wants hacked library, there is no point to make even
separated port.
Certainly thunderbird too. Not sure about others, but, likely, www/libxul too --
and www/seamonkey2. Worse: we tend to have multiple versions of some of those in
the tree
Anonymous swell.k at gmail.com writes:
Doug Barton dougb at FreeBSD.org writes:
readelf -s /lib/libc.so.7 | fgrep __stack_chk_fail
952: 0002806026 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 10
__stack_chk_fail@@FBSD_1.0
1457: 0002806026 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 10 __stack_chk_fail_local
b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/custom-gcc/configuring-ports-gcc.html
Despite claims of 100% backwards-compatibility for these libraries,
this remapping will have some consequences,
Did you miss ports/148196? ld(1) ignores
On 7/11/10, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com writes:
...
Did you miss ports/148196? ld(1) ignores libmap.conf and will try to
I did miss it, but it doesn't really surprise me. I've only seen
discussion of libmap.conf(5) with reference to rtld(1), and AFAIK
ld(1)
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
readelf -s /lib/libc.so.7 | fgrep __stack_chk_fail
952: 0002806026 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 10 __stack_chk_fail@@FBSD_1.0
1457: 0002806026 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 10
__stack_chk_fail_lo...@fbsd_1.0
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
One more question. Is your gcc compiled with the LTO option?
(/var/db/ports/gcc*/options will tell you.) I had that enabled (it's off by
default) so I'm going to try recompiling gcc without it and see if it helps.
Never mind, compiling without the LTO
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
nm libssp.so.0 | grep __stack_chk_fail_local
0ac0 t __stack_chk_fail_local
So I'm at a loss, and pretty close to throwing in the towel and going
back to the base gcc for everything.
I'm not sure what FreeBSD version you're using but I have
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Anonymous wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
nm libssp.so.0 | grep __stack_chk_fail_local
0ac0 t __stack_chk_fail_local
I'm not sure what FreeBSD version you're using
-current, and I update just about every day. I tried upgrading -current
with a clean
pngtest pngtest.o -lpng -lz -lm
pngread.So: In function `png_create_read_struct_2':
/usr/local/tmp/usr/local/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng-1.4.3/pngread.c:201:
undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local'
pngrutil.So: In function `png_read_chunk_header':
/usr/local/tmp/usr/local/ports/graphics/png
=gnu99
-fstack-protector -L. -static -o pngtest pngtest.o -lpng -lz -lm
pngread.So: In function `png_create_read_struct_2':
/usr/local/tmp/usr/local/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng-1.4.3/pngread.c:201:
undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local'
pngrutil.So: In function `png_read_chunk_header
On 06/29/10 19:27, Anonymous wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Tried doing the update today, but it failed:
Full log at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/png-gcc451.log
Visibility and binding for that symbol are same here whether using
gcc45 or basegcc.
You can try to build
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/29/10 19:27, Anonymous wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Tried doing the update today, but it failed:
Full log at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/png-gcc451.log
Visibility and binding for that symbol are same here whether using
I am trying to install the graphics/png port on my PowerMac G4, which runs
8.1-beta1:
r...@kg-g4# uname -a
FreeBSD kg-g4.kg4.no 8.1-BETA1 FreeBSD 8.1-BETA1 #0: Fri May 28 04:38:56 UTC
2010 r...@xserve.lan.xcllnt.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC powerpc
r...@kg-g4# cd /usr/ports/graphics/png
r
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to install the graphics/png port on my PowerMac G4, which runs
8.1-beta1:
r...@kg-g4# uname -a
FreeBSD kg-g4.kg4.no 8.1-BETA1 FreeBSD 8.1-BETA1 #0: Fri May 28 04:38:56 UTC
2010 r
In the /usr/ports/UPDATING is:
20090328:
AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org
The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1. Please rebuild all
ports that depend on it.
If you use portmaster:
portmaster -r jpeg-
If you use portupgrade
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:47:36AM -0500, ajtiM wrote:
In the /usr/ports/UPDATING is:
20090328:
AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org
The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1. Please rebuild all
ports that depend on it.
If you use portmaster
On Sunday 28 March 2010 08:45:32 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:47:36AM -0500, ajtiM wrote:
In the /usr/ports/UPDATING is:
20090328:
AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org
The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1. Please rebuild
On 03/28/10 09:09, ajtiM wrote:
snip
Thank you but if I use:
portmaster -r png-
I got === No valid installed port, or port directory given
=== Try portmaster --help
If I use portmaster -r /usr/ports/graphics/png-
=== No valid installed port, or port directory given
=== Try portmaster
On Sunday 28 March 2010 09:22:22 Programmer In Training wrote:
On 03/28/10 09:09, ajtiM wrote:
snip
Thank you but if I use:
portmaster -r png-
I got === No valid installed port, or port directory given
=== Try portmaster --help
If I use portmaster -r /usr/ports/graphics/png
=== Try portmaster --help
If I use portmaster -r /usr/ports/graphics/png-
=== No valid installed port, or port directory given
=== Try portmaster --help
What I am doing wrong, please?
Mitja
Get rid of the trailing hyphen.
portmaster -r png
=== No valid installed
On 03/28/10 07:09, ajtiM wrote:
What I am doing wrong, please?
Nothing, the mistake is mine. The docs say that 'portmaster -r' accepts
a glob pattern, but that's not accurate. I will work on fixing that bug
asap, but meanwhile you can do this:
portmaster -r `echo /var/db/pkg/png-1* | sed
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:38PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Pass me the full log please.
http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/png-1.2.35.log
You have
WITHOUT_MAN=yes
I am not sure how ports system should handle that, in case it should.
--
http://ache.pp.ru/
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:38PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Pass me the full log please.
http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/png-1.2.35.log
You have
WITHOUT_MAN=yes
I am not sure how ports system should handle that, in case it should.
'
*** Error code 1
Stop in /a/ports/graphics/png.
Deleting png-1.2.35
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/man/man3/libpng.3.gz' doesn't exist
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/man/man3/libpngpf.3.gz' doesn't exist
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/man/man5/png.5.gz' doesn't exist
pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Pass me the full log please.
http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/png-1.2.35.log
--
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c:
-1.2.35.tbz
Registering depends:.
Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/tmp/packages/All/png-1.2.35.tbz'
*** Error code 1
Stop in /a/ports/graphics/png.
Deleting png-1.2.35
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/man/man3/libpng.3.gz' doesn't exist
pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/man/man3/libpngpf.3.gz' doesn't exist
Hello,
Peter Czanik írta:
Peter Czanik írta:
Hello,
Recently graphics/png can't be packaged:
libpng passes test
=== Installing for png-1.2.34
=== Generating temporary packing list
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 libpng-config /usr/local/bin
ln -sf libpng-config /usr/local/bin
Peter Czanik írta:
Hello,
Recently graphics/png can't be packaged:
libpng passes test
=== Installing for png-1.2.34
=== Generating temporary packing list
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 libpng-config /usr/local/bin
ln -sf libpng-config /usr/local/bin/libpng12-config
install -C -o root
Hello,
Recently graphics/png can't be packaged:
libpng passes test
=== Installing for png-1.2.34
=== Generating temporary packing list
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 libpng-config /usr/local/bin
ln -sf libpng-config /usr/local/bin/libpng12-config
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libpng.a
to build the ports -- whether to:
* build the libpng as static from the sources, that come with each
of the
numerous Mozilla pieces and link them into each piece statically;
* fork a separate graphics/mozilla-png -- CONFLICT it with graphics/png
and allow the users to install one
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:10:59PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Personally, I think, I'm in favor of the last approach, at least for
now that animated PNG (APNG) content is non-existent anyway
Except for many of the chrome icons in firefox, etc. i.e. doing this
with break firefox. Do
Sent by Jeremy Lea:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:10:59PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Personally, I think, I'm in favor of the last approach, at least for
now that animated PNG (APNG) content is non-existent anyway
Except for many of the chrome icons in firefox, etc. i.e. doing
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:06:52PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Was not one of the advantages of APNG the fact, that a non-Animated PNG
reader will still show the first frame of the animation? In that case,
the icons will simply be non-animated...
The throbber is pretty important UI
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:06:52PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Was not one of the advantages of APNG the fact, that a non-Animated PNG
reader will still show the first frame of the animation? In that case,
the icons will simply be non-animated...
The throbber
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:16:43PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
The throbber is pretty important UI for a browser. If you break it,
people will complain.
Uhm, what is throbber? Could you elaborate?
The little spinning things in the tabs, or the right hand side of the
menu bar, which tell you
side of the
menu bar, which tell you that its loading a page.
Oh, I see. Well, if that thing requires APNG, then, indeed, it is
indispensable and the cat is, indeed, out of the bag... In that case we
should either make our own graphics/apng or add the patch to graphics/png.
-mi
own graphics/apng or add the patch to
graphics/png.
I rather to honor graphics/png (include PNG folks) and no way for
graphics/apng as it will be worst to have conflict in ports tree. It's
pain in ass. Keep in its tarball and compiles as static is fine. It's no
big deal and problem solve
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 23:02 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hello,
I
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hello,
I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hello,
I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it
works
merged the patch into the latest version (1.2.33) that we use, and have
made an appropriate change to the port files of graphics/png. I think
that APNG support from libpng may be useful in other software as well.
I am attaching the patch, to apply in /usr/ports, for anyone to test. So
far
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 02:28 +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 01:22:34PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here:
* http://littlesvr.ca/apng/.
This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest
source tree.
an appropriate change to the port files of graphics/png. I think
that APNG support from libpng may be useful in other software as well.
I am attaching the patch, to apply in /usr/ports, for anyone to test. So
far it doesn't seem to regress anything for me, and I can use
thunderbird 3 with --with-system
this:
if ${.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*}
CC= distcc cc
.endif
It's actually more complex, but that's what it comes down to.
If I now do that:
# cd /usr/ports/graphics/png; make -V CC
distcc cc
I can see that the ports makefile has the right CC setting. However, the file
/usr/obj/usr/ports/graphics/png/work/libpng
to anything and it honors.
How did you set? The graphics/png doesn't honor it when you add CC=foobar
in make.conf or graphics/png/Makefile.
/usr/ports/graphics/png ttyp2 73_# setenv CC gcc -g
/usr/ports/graphics/png ttyp2 74_# make
=== Extracting for png-1.2.12_1
= MD5 Checksum OK
, Andrey Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Variable.
I can't reproduce that, it honors CC for me.
I can, CC=gcc will not change the CC when it compiles.
It is hard to imagine how it is ever
wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:35:14 -0500, Andrey Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Variable.
I can't reproduce that, it honors CC
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:34:52PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Because your make.conf settings are not location sensitive. Remove the
setting from your make.conf and or environment. Then try:
# make CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc42
You will see, it will not have an effect.
/usr/ports/graphics/png
]Kamikaze wrote:
The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Variable.
I can't reproduce that, it honors CC for me.
I can, CC=gcc will not change the CC when it compiles
[LoN]Kamikaze, 28.07.06, 11:40h CEST:
The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Variable.
The preferred way of reporting problems is via send-pr(1) - if possible,
with a patch that fixes the problem. Furthermore, it seems that this port
has a maintainer.
Regards,
Stefan
pgpqxNf94HTmj.pgp
98 matches
Mail list logo
