Re: [FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice)

2012-07-20 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-19 15:36:54 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 2012-07-19 15:09:08 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: Btw, does anybody know *why* the LibreOffice port attempts to compile everything as C++0x or C++11? Is it really using those features? It

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-19 Thread Leslie Jensen
2012-07-19 01:49, Jung-uk Kim skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-18 18:21:53 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes: It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please

Re: [FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice)

2012-07-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-19 01:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++ compilers may have different __cplusplus definitions and it may cause some strangeness. Clang, for example, used to set it to 1 but

Re: [FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice)

2012-07-19 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-19 01:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++ compilers may have different __cplusplus definitions and it may cause some

Re: [FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice)

2012-07-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-19 20:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... Since when Clang started mimicking GCC 4.7? Most likely since somebody attempted to get the latest GNU libstdc++ building with clang, and bumped into precisely this issue: if __cplusplus has the

Re: [FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice)

2012-07-19 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-19 15:09:08 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-19 20:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... Since when Clang started mimicking GCC 4.7? Most likely since somebody attempted to get the

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Leslie Jensen
. === make failed for editors/libreoffice === Aborting update === Update for editors/libreoffice failed === Aborting update __ cd /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3 /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu writes: I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure to fix the problem does not work for me. What version of clang do you have installed? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Leslie Jensen
I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to install devel-clang 3.2  Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org skrev:Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu writes: I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure to fix the problem does not work

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-18 10:57:58 -0400, Leslie Jensen wrote: I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to install devel-clang 3.2 I found that it does not build with clang-devel, yet. :-( It is not clang's fault actually and I am

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes: It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please stay tuned. One issue is that different problems have been presenting with very similar symptoms, so that it's hard to help people who need technical assistance. I don't see anything we can

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Chris Rees
/libreoffice. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice. === make failed for editors/libreoffice === Aborting update === Update for editors/libreoffice failed === Aborting update __ cd /usr/ports/editors

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes: It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please stay tuned. One issue is that different problems have been presenting with very

[FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice)

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++ compilers may have different __cplusplus definitions and it may cause some strangeness. Clang, for example, used to set it to 1

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-18 18:21:53 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes: It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please stay tuned. One issue is that

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-14 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/13/2012 03:39, Warren Block wrote: With the patch and base clang/llvm on two amd64 systems here, 'libreoffice --calc' shows the startup screen, then exits with status 139. No core dump or anything, it just quits. Other modules all seem to work. I previously had this problem, but can

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was fixed by upstream now. I have a patch ready for -CURRENT, but if anyone can try it out, and confirm it now allows you to build LibreOffice without this particular assertion, that

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Olivier Smedts
2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org: On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was fixed by upstream now. I have a patch ready for -CURRENT, but if anyone can try it out, and confirm it now allows you to build

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote: 2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org: On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was fixed by upstream now. I have a patch ready for -CURRENT, but if

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote: 2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org: On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was fixed by upstream now.

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Florian Smeets
On 07/13/2012 12:39, Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote: Yes, this works. Libreoffice 3.5.4 builds and installs at the first try with the clang assert patch and WITH_SYSTEM_CLANG. Now Calc core

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 06:39:08 -0400, Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote: 2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org: On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ... It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and try again, e.g., mv ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep /tmp At least, it worked for me. :-) FWIW,

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ... It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and try again, e.g., mv

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ... It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and try again, e.g., mv

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ... It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 18:36:37 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ... It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 18:46:09 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-13 22:15,

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 19:26:21 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 2012-07-13 18:46:09 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-13 18:07:32

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-13 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Jung-uk Kim wrote: It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and try again, e.g., mv ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep /tmp At least, it worked for me. :-) I'll do a

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-04 21:53, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-04 21:13, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2012-Jul-03 14:19:21 +0200, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote: ... Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed EST != EST_Uninstantiated), function isNothrow, file

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-10 Thread Doug Barton
Dimitry, Thanks for looking into this. Did you see my message where I reported that clang from ports works fine for LO on -current, but the base clang fails? How does this change compare to the code that's already in the clang port? Doug On 07/10/2012 00:18, Dimitry Andric wrote: On

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-10 09:21, Doug Barton wrote: Thanks for looking into this. Did you see my message where I reported that clang from ports works fine for LO on -current, but the base clang fails? The lang/clang port is the same version as clang in base (3.1 release, minus a few patches needed for

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Jul-03 14:19:21 +0200, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote: ... Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed EST != EST_Uninstantiated), function isNothrow, file

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-04 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-04 21:13, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2012-Jul-03 14:19:21 +0200, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote: ... Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed EST != EST_Uninstantiated), function isNothrow, file

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi All, 02.07.2012 12:23, Leslie Jensen пишет: internal build errors: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.4.2/canvas/prj it seems that the error is inside 'canvas' I've got the same error at FreeBSD-CURRENT and latest ports

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-03 Thread Franci Nabalanci
On FreeBSD 9.0 Release I built without problems with Clang 3.0 On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: Hi All, 02.07.2012 12:23, Leslie Jensen пишет: internal build errors: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote: ... Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed EST != EST_Uninstantiated), function isNothrow, file /usr/ports/lang/clang/work/llvm-3.1.src/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/../../include/clang/AST/Type.h, line 2873. ... clang: note: diagnostic msg:

make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-02 Thread Leslie Jensen
/libreoffice-core-3.5.4.2 gmake: *** [source-env-and-recurse] Fel 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice. === make failed for editors/libreoffice === Aborting update === Update for editors/libreoffice failed === Aborting update

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-06 Thread Hiroto Kagotani
Hi 2012/6/6 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com: You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice, but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/* Thank you for pointing out the problem. To make the priority of /usr/local/include lower than those from libreoffice, remove

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 12:51:16AM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Hello all... finally I track down the problem with libreoffice, the problem is with the boost headers and files You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice, but somehow the makefiles searches

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-06 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Hello all... finally I track down the problem with libreoffice, the problem is with the boost headers and files You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice, but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/* Solution: remove

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-06 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 06.06.2012 16:32 (UTC+2), Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Hello all... finally I track down the problem with libreoffice, the problem is with the boost headers and files You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice, but somehow the makefiles

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:54:18PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 06.06.2012 16:32 (UTC+2), Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Hello all... finally I track down the problem with libreoffice, the problem is with the boost headers and files You

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-06 Thread Leslie Jensen
2012-06-06 16:32, Warren Block skrev: On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Hello all... finally I track down the problem with libreoffice, the problem is with the boost headers and files You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice, but somehow the makefiles searches

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice. === make failed for editors/libreoffice === Aborting update === Update for editors/libreoffice failed === Aborting update Terminated ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:13:56AM +0200, coder.tuxfamily wrote: Le 05.06.2012 05:48, Heino Tiedemann a écrit : Leslie Jensenles...@eskk.nu wrote: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Guido Falsi
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: I have the same problem but i can pass it except for tail_build. My options : GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe tested also with GTK2) JAVA MMEDIA PGSQL SVG The problem is that none of the reports here

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: I have the same problem but i can pass it except for tail_build. My options : GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe tested also with GTK2) JAVA MMEDIA

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Guido Falsi
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: I'm having this same problem, if you need a full log here you can find it: http://www.madpilot.net/~mad/typescript.xz Compressing it with xz reduced

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Jakub Lach
in Penryns) or newer CPU. As far I can tell, calc and editor are working. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/make-failed-for-editors-libreoffice-tp5713591p5715326.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Robert Huff
Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs? If so, what is the correct way to do so? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: I'm having this same problem, if you need a full log here you can find it:

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs? If so, what is the correct way to do so? Robert Huff Well it is disabled by default the parallel build you see is enable natively by their

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Jakub Lach
Theoretically LibreOffice already has MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes in port's Makefile, but it's internally still parallelizing, correct? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/make-failed-for-editors-libreoffice-tp5713591p5715337.html Sent from the freebsd-ports

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:03:20AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote: Theoretically LibreOffice already has MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes in port's Makefile, but it's internally still parallelizing, correct? Correct regards, Bapt pgpc67zRP2Ecn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs? If so, what is the correct way to do so? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Guido Falsi
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs? If so, what is the correct way to do so? Robert Huff

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs? If so, what is the correct way to do so?

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Guido Falsi
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:55:55PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Is it possible to

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: I have the same problem but i can pass it except for tail_build. My options : GTK3 (I don't remember, but maybe

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs? If so, what is the correct way to do so? Robert Huff

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-05 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Em Ter, 2012-06-05 às 19:35 +0200, Heino Tiedemann escreveu: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs? If so, what is the correct way to do so? in the Makefile near

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-05 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Hello all... finally I track down the problem with libreoffice, the problem is with the boost headers and files You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice, but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/* Solution: remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam, then go to the

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice SOLVED

2012-06-05 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all... finally I track down the problem with libreoffice, the problem is with the boost headers and files You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice, but somehow the makefiles searches

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-04 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com wrote: Em Qui, 2012-05-31 às 17:31 +0200, Leslie Jensen escreveu: 2012-05-31 14:24, Robert Huff skrev: Leslie Jensen writes:  

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-04 Thread Florent
gmake[1]: *** [build] Fel 1 gmake[1]: Lämnar katalogen /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2 gmake: *** [source-env-and-recurse] Fel 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice. === make failed for editors/libreoffice === Aborting update === Update

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-04 Thread Jakub Lach
'clean' build With cppunit it helped, with boost not so much. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/make-failed-for-editors-libreoffice-tp5713591p5715076.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-04 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-04 Thread coder.tuxfamily
Le 05.06.2012 05:48, Heino Tiedemann a écrit : Leslie Jensenles...@eskk.nu wrote: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-06-02 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com wrote: Em Qui, 2012-05-31 às 17:31 +0200, Leslie Jensen escreveu: 2012-05-31 14:24, Robert Huff skrev: Leslie Jensen writes:   ---      

make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-05-31 Thread Leslie Jensen
]: Lämnar katalogen /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2 gmake: *** [source-env-and-recurse] Fel 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice. === make failed for editors/libreoffice === Aborting update === Update for editors/libreoffice failed === Aborting update

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-05-31 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Em Qui, 2012-05-31 às 11:36 +0200, Leslie Jensen escreveu: Help Please! Thanks Seems that clang (and or) gmake running paralell (in my case -P8) and are not treating dependencies right... in your code, the error message tells how to restart(or make only the module that is in error)... cd

make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-05-31 Thread Robert Huff
Leslie Jensen writes: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-05-31 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Em Qui, 2012-05-31 às 17:31 +0200, Leslie Jensen escreveu: 2012-05-31 14:24, Robert Huff skrev: Leslie Jensen writes: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with