-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Synopsis: [patch] devel/dmucs unbreak on 64bits archs
|
| State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
| State-Changed-By: fjoe
| State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 7 16:18:07 UTC 2008
| State-Changed-Why:
| Proper integer type for
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to
fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t.
I do not think that C99 requires the size_t to be capable of holding
the pointer. size_t is only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kostik Belousov wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to
| fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t.
| I do not think that
Hello!
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to
| fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t.
| I do not think that C99 requires the size_t to be capable of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Max Khon wrote:
| Hello!
|
| Pietro Cerutti wrote:
|
| | On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| | I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not
| required to
| | fit into a long, while it is required to fit
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:20:17PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kostik Belousov wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to
| fit into a
