Re: unreliable pkg upgrade of pecl / pear packages after flavors

2018-04-03 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Mathieu Arnold wrote on 2018/04/03 17:34: On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 05:07:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:14:06PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: UPDATING entry says it should be upgraded automatically

Re: unreliable pkg upgrade of pecl / pear packages after flavors

2018-04-03 Thread Mateusz Piotrowski
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:34:25 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: >On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 05:07:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: >> How would someone performing only binary package updates know to >> look at ports/UPDATING, and how would that be done? Such an >> installation may well

Re: unreliable pkg upgrade of pecl / pear packages after flavors

2018-04-03 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 05:07:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:14:06PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > UPDATING entry says it should be upgraded automatically but it was not. > > > > > >

Re: unreliable pkg upgrade of pecl / pear packages after flavors

2018-04-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:14:06PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > UPDATING entry says it should be upgraded automatically but it was not. > > > > "People using Poudriere 3.2+ and binary packages do not have to do > > anything."

Re: unreliable pkg upgrade of pecl / pear packages after flavors

2018-04-03 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:14:06PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > UPDATING entry says it should be upgraded automatically but it was not. > > "People using Poudriere 3.2+ and binary packages do not have to do > anything." M, well, this sentence is partly right, and partly wrong. If you

unreliable pkg upgrade of pecl / pear packages after flavors

2018-04-02 Thread Miroslav Lachman
UPDATING entry says it should be upgraded automatically but it was not. "People using Poudriere 3.2+ and binary packages do not have to do anything." Our packages was built in Poudriere 3.2.4. pkg upgrade on target machines did upgrade of Apache, PHP, extensions etc. but PECL a PEAR