Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization

2008-07-30 Thread Vladimir Chukharev
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:13:44 +0300, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: V.Chukharev wrote: Another patch, just one line. It can be applied independently from the patch for bsd.port.subdir.mk. I use: grep -l @comment ORIGIN:${1}$ $pdb/*/+CONTENTS for similar purposes in portmaster with no

Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization

2008-07-30 Thread V.Chukharev
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:28:26 +0300, V.Chukharev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:19:42 +0300, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You don't want to .include the file, just use the same make -f trick that I used for e.g. the python and java variable caching. Ah, thanks, I

Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization

2008-07-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
V.Chukharev wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:28:26 +0300, V.Chukharev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:19:42 +0300, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You don't want to .include the file, just use the same make -f trick that I used for e.g. the python and java variable

Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization

2008-07-30 Thread Vladimir Chukharev
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:09:16 +0300, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: V.Chukharev wrote: I have found why there is a difference in INDEX-7 generated with and without caching. Without cache security/p5-openxpki* (6 connected ports) are indexed as depending on both openssl-0.9.8h_1

Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization

2008-07-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
Vladimir Chukharev wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:09:16 +0300, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: V.Chukharev wrote: I have found why there is a difference in INDEX-7 generated with and without caching. Without cache security/p5-openxpki* (6 connected ports) are indexed as depending on

Re: port ezload (linux: fxload) unmaintained?

2008-07-30 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I proposed some changes to ezload in march. I've not heard from the maintainer or author, and the download site is offline today. It is up an running now: http://proj.bpsw.biz/ezload/

Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Bill Moran
cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VANQUISH i386 # pkg_info | grep portupgrade portupgrade-2.4.6,2 FreeBSD

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Marcin Wisnicki
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/ sys/VANQUISH i386 #

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread RW
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400 Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008 [EMAIL

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread RW
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:07:55 + (UTC) Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: ** Makefile possibly broken: x11/xscreensaver-gnome: Makefile, line 106: warning: Option KEYRING needs PAM, but PAM is disabled.

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Marcin Wisnicki
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:30:50 +0100, RW wrote: I think Bill probably understands that. The issue, as I see it, is that the warning will just be a warning if you build manually, but if you build through portupgrade it causes it to fail. If the intent was to stop the build then IGNORE should

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Marcin Wisnicki
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:09:11 -0500, Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:30:50 +0100, RW wrote: I think Bill probably understands that. The issue, as I see it, is that the warning will just be a warning if you build manually, but if you build through portupgrade

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:17 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread RW
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:33:07 -0400 Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Why is portupgrade dying on a warning message? Why does a poor decision on one port prevent everything on my system from upgrading? 3) The error from portupgrade does not immediately point me to the easy solution,

You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

2008-07-30 Thread received
You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! . You can pick up your postcard at the following web address: . [1]Click here to pick up your postcard . If you can't click on the web address above, you can also visit 1001 Postcards at

Re: Problems with portupgrade xscreensaver-gnome

2008-07-30 Thread RW
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:11:56 +0100 RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All port build tools make use of make -V to read vaiables. With this warning in place, you get something like this: # make -V CONFLICTS Makefile, line 106: warning: Option KEYRING needs PAM, but PAM is disabled.

Call for comments - pkg_trans

2008-07-30 Thread Ivan Voras
Hi, I apologize in advance if what I'm trying to do seems stupid or it has already existed since the Dawn of Time (i.e. when McKusick was in diapers) but I'd like your comments on this idea: http://wiki.freebsd.org/IvanVoras/PkgTransProposal I can write the pkg_trans utility and modify the

Re: Call for comments - pkg_trans

2008-07-30 Thread Doug Barton
Ivan Voras wrote: Hi, I apologize in advance if what I'm trying to do seems stupid or it has already existed since the Dawn of Time (i.e. when McKusick was in diapers) but I'd like your comments on this idea: http://wiki.freebsd.org/IvanVoras/PkgTransProposal I can write the pkg_trans