Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
 Martin Cracauer wrote:
 Doug Barton wrote on Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:58:57PM -0800:
 Are you saying there are binary packages for 8-stable?

 I thought I can only have them for -RELEASE?

 There have always been binary packages for the -stable branches. For
 example check out ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/.

 RELENG_8 will lift be out of binary ports, at least as far as
 portupgrade is concerned.

 Sorry, I don't understand that sentence.

 RELENG_8_0 will have emergency fixes AFAIK

 I'm sorry, that's not correct. RELENG_8_0 is a fixed point in time.
 The 8.0 -p1 security branch will be RELENG_8_1, etc.


I do not agree on this one. RELENG_8_0 is the correct tag for
following FreeBSD 8.0 with security fixes. RELENG_8_0_0_RELEASE on the
other hand is fixed. RELENG_8_1 will be the branch for FreeBSD 8.1.

-- 
chs,
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS

2010-01-06 Thread Erwin Lansing
Dear port maintainers,

The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values.  They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory.  If your ports conflict with
ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
them.


Thanks,
Erwin Annoying Reminder Guy III Lansing


LATEST_LINK  PORTNAME   MAINTAINER  
==
pear-Doctrinedatabases/pear-Doctrineglar...@freebsd.org 
pear-Doctrinedatabases/pear-Doctrine12  glar...@freebsd.org 
rsyslog  sysutils/rsyslog4  cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog  sysutils/rsyslog5  cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-gnutls   sysutils/rsyslog4-gnutls   cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-gnutls   sysutils/rsyslog5-gnutls   cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-gssapi   sysutils/rsyslog4-gssapi   cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-gssapi   sysutils/rsyslog5-gssapi   cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-libdbi   sysutils/rsyslog4-dbi  cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-libdbi   sysutils/rsyslog5-dbi  cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-mysqlsysutils/rsyslog4-mysqlcristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-mysqlsysutils/rsyslog5-mysqlcristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-pgsqlsysutils/rsyslog4-pgsqlcristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-pgsqlsysutils/rsyslog5-pgsqlcristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-relp sysutils/rsyslog4-relp cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-relp sysutils/rsyslog5-relp cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-rfc3195  sysutils/rsyslog4-rfc3195  cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-rfc3195  sysutils/rsyslog5-rfc3195  cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-snmp sysutils/rsyslog4-snmp cristianoro...@hotmail.com
rsyslog-snmp sysutils/rsyslog5-snmp cristianoro...@hotmail.com
surf www/surf   jig...@gmx.de   
surf math/surf  po...@freebsd.org   

Total: 22 ports
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build on sparc

2010-01-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:24:26PM -, Simon Griffiths wrote:
 Hello,
 
  -Original Message-
  From: owner-freebsd-spar...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
  spar...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Anton Shterenlikht
  Sent: 18 December 2009 13:41
  To: Andrew Belashov
  Cc: gn...@freebsd.org; freebsd-spar...@freebsd.org; freebsd-
  po...@freebsd.org
  Subject: Re: port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build on sparc
  
  On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:17:40PM +0300, Andrew Belashov wrote:
  **
  ERROR:ginfo.c:337:g_base_info_get_name: code should not be reached
  gmake[3]: *** [foo-1.0.tgir] Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
  gmake[3]: *** Deleting file `foo-1.0.tgir'
  gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-
  introspection/work/gobject
  -introspection-0.6.6/tests/scanner'
  gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
  
  
  
  --
  Anton Shterenlikht
  Room 2.6, Queen's Building
  Mech Eng Dept
  Bristol University
  University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
  Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
  Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
 
 Did you find a way around this problem Anton?

no, but I haven't tried too hard.
I'm trying again right now and will report back.


-- 
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:45:05 -0800
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:

 Martin Cracauer wrote:
  RELENG_8 will lift be out of binary ports, at least as far as
  portupgrade is concerned.
 
 Sorry, I don't understand that sentence.
 

I would guess this should read will be left out of...  Follows logically
from his concern that there are no binary packages for -STABLE.

---
Gary Jennejohn
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Call for tester: VirtualBox 3.1.2 for FreeBSD (take 2)

2010-01-06 Thread Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 18:31 +0100, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Hi,
 
 First of all thanks a lot for all the valuable feedback. We have updated
 the ports 
Works without a problem here on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0 r201431 i386
with Windows XP and Debian Lenny guests.

Thank you very much for this work.

-- 
Alexandre Kovalenko (Олександр Коваленко)


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Martin Cracauer
Gary Jennejohn wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:31:48PM +0100: 
 On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:45:05 -0800
 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
 
  Martin Cracauer wrote:
   RELENG_8 will lift be out of binary ports, at least as far as
   portupgrade is concerned.
  
  Sorry, I don't understand that sentence.
  
 
 I would guess this should read will be left out of...  Follows logically
 from his concern that there are no binary packages for -STABLE.

Right.  I meant going -stable will lift me out of binary ports
[support].

So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and
install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there.

ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/
seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right?

So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec.

Martin
-- 
%%%
Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today.  http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa

On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote:


So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and
install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there.

ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/
seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right?

So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec.
I wonder if people who succeed in building OOo (happens about 
twice a year to me) could put their packages on some kind of ftp 
server. From their mailing list I get the impression OOo-porting 
team could need all kind of help.


Greetings

Uli.



Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today.  http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




| Peter Ulrich Kruppa
| Wuppertal
| Germany
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Martin Cracauer
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:46:38PM +0100: 
 On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote:
 
 So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and
 install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there.
 
 ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/
 seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right?
 
 So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec.
 I wonder if people who succeed in building OOo (happens about 
 twice a year to me) could put their packages on some kind of ftp 
 server. From their mailing list I get the impression OOo-porting 
 team could need all kind of help.

Might be easier to just slam a Debian into a chroot.

How do chroot and Linuxulator play together, anyway? Can I have a
random-Linux in /compat/linux and then have a different one in 
/compat/linux/var/chroot/debian
?

Alternatively I could just leave this poor notebook alone WRT building
and run the same FreeBSD on one of my beefier machines to build binary
packages and share the successes.  Would probably involve two complete
installations, one with a ports tree that only ever builds OO (and
pulls in it's dependencies but nothing else).

Martin
-- 
%%%
Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today.  http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa

On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote:


Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:46:38PM +0100:

On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote:


So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and
install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there.

ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/
seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right?

So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec.

I wonder if people who succeed in building OOo (happens about
twice a year to me) could put their packages on some kind of ftp
server. From their mailing list I get the impression OOo-porting
team could need all kind of help.


Might be easier to just slam a Debian into a chroot.

How do chroot and Linuxulator play together, anyway? Can I have a
random-Linux in /compat/linux and then have a different one in
/compat/linux/var/chroot/debian
?

Alternatively I could just leave this poor notebook alone WRT building
and run the same FreeBSD on one of my beefier machines to build binary
packages and share the successes.  Would probably involve two complete
installations, one with a ports tree that only ever builds OO (and
pulls in it's dependencies but nothing else).
If you manage to install OOo in  Linuxolator, please 
publish some kind of HOWTO...


Today I started an experiment: I created a jail as a clean 
build enviroment for OOo. Yet it has installed 145 dependencies 
and not even started building OOo.


Greetings

Uli.




Martin
--
%%%
Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today.  http://www.freebsd.org/




| Peter Ulrich Kruppa
| Wuppertal
| Germany
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS

2010-01-06 Thread Philip M. Gollucci

Erwin Lansing wrote:

Dear port maintainers,

The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values.  They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory.  If your ports conflict with
ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
them.


I'll fix the rsyslog ports when I do

o	2010/01/06	ports/142368	pgollucci	[maintainer-update] - update 
sysutils/rsyslog5 to version 5.3.5


--

1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation
Committer,FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,   P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


UIDs question

2010-01-06 Thread Jason

Hi,

I am new to building ports, however I have started to get the hang of
things.

I am not building any ports that I intend on submitting to FreeBSD, yet,
however maybe that isn't too far off :)

I've used a guide I found to create a local ports repository that is working
out wonderfully with the existing ports tree under /usr/ports

My tree is under /usr/ports/local, and I found a way to integrate a local
UIDs and GIDs file, by setting this variable in my Makefile:

UID_FILES:=${PORTSDIR}/local/UIDs

When I go to install my port it installs the user as expected, however it
fails on the ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} function. I understand this is just using
install with the appropriate flags. Obviously, the port doesn't install.

If I run it again, the user is already on the system, and the port installs
successfully.

I was wondering if there is a way to have the port install the user using
the native USERS or GROUPS directives in the do-install phase with the
INSTALL macros, or if there is a more suggested, or conventional, way of
doing this operation.

Thanks in advance!
Jason
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Martin Cracauer
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:43:21PM +0100: 
 On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote:
 
 Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote on Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:46:38PM +0100:
 On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote:
 
 So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and
 install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there.
 
 ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/
 seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right?
 
 So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec.
 I wonder if people who succeed in building OOo (happens about
 twice a year to me) could put their packages on some kind of ftp
 server. From their mailing list I get the impression OOo-porting
 team could need all kind of help.
 
 Might be easier to just slam a Debian into a chroot.
 
 How do chroot and Linuxulator play together, anyway? Can I have a
 random-Linux in /compat/linux and then have a different one in
 /compat/linux/var/chroot/debian
 ?
 
 Alternatively I could just leave this poor notebook alone WRT building
 and run the same FreeBSD on one of my beefier machines to build binary
 packages and share the successes.  Would probably involve two complete
 installations, one with a ports tree that only ever builds OO (and
 pulls in it's dependencies but nothing else).

 If you manage to install OOo in  Linuxolator, please 
 publish some kind of HOWTO...

If there is a serious question WRT it does run in the Linux emulator
that would be easy enough to test, I can just NFS-mount one of my
diskless Debians.

 Today I started an experiment: I created a jail as a clean 
 build enviroment for OOo. Yet it has installed 145 dependencies 
 and not even started building OOo.

I expected nothing less.

The Java requirement is particularly annoying on FreeBSD.  And all
that do get a Powerpoint clone with drunker mouse pointer syndrome
written in tcl...

Martin
-- 
%%%
Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
FreeBSD - where you want to go, today.  http://www.freebsd.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ports/devel/protobuf: Segmentation fault in mmap in some applications

2010-01-06 Thread Pieter de Goeje
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 14:14:28 O. Hartmann wrote:
 Dear Sirs,
 We use a software package for scientific imagery processing from USGS,
 ISIS3 (http://isis.astrogeology.usgs.gov/). The most recent version is
 3.1.21 and since this version, the software intensively uses
 libprotobuf.so.

 While we can use ISIS 3.1.20 very well under FreeBSD 8.0/amd64, it is
 impossible to use the software with version no. 3.1.21, which seems to
 have some issues wih libprotobuf.so. Every client out of this ISIS3
 package crashes with a segmentation fault and as far as I can judge the
 situation, there is a problem with libprotobuf.so, against which all
 clients out of ISIS 3.1.21 are linked.

Perhaps the ISIS package was developed using a different (older?) version of 
Google's protocol buffers. Compiling protobuf from source is quite easy on 
FreeBSD. You can find the source here: 
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list
I would start by trying version 2.1.0 and 2.2.0a.


 I searched for help on the ISIS3-support forum and realised that some
 Apple OS X guys have had similar problems, but those threads where
 closed immediately or got relative senseless response.

 In our case, we compile every necessary library and prerequisite
 software package (mostly Qt4 libs) from ports. This works great with
 some tweaks for FreeBSD in make/config.freebsd (which I derived from
 some linux and/or OS X config files).

 Now I'm floating like a dead man i the water. Below I provide q gdb
 output of the qview-client (the same is with all other clients, like
 photrim etc. for those familiar with the software package).

A backtrace ('bt' at the gdb prompt) might contain more useful information.


 Additionaly, I provide a truss-output, that stops at mmap issues.

 Well, if someone could provide me with some advance debugging hints I
 would appreaciate them. I'm pretty sure he problem is located within the
 libprotobuf library or the way it is treated, but this is a guess of a
 non-developer.

 Thanks very much in advance.
 Please reply also to this email address, since I'm not subscriber of the
 list I post to.

 Oliver

- Pieter
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Binary packages for releases and portupgrade

2010-01-06 Thread Lars Engels
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 08:46:38PM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
 On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Martin Cracauer wrote:
 
  So the verdict is to hunt down OpenOffice packages manually and
  install them so that portupgrade ignores them, then go from there.
 
  ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/
  seems to have what `portupgrade -P` should expect, right?
 
  So I wouldn't have to move from stable to release+sec.
 I wonder if people who succeed in building OOo (happens about 
 twice a year to me) could put their packages on some kind of ftp 
 server. From their mailing list I get the impression OOo-porting 
 team could need all kind of help.

There are already some builds (english and german) at
http://wiki.bsdforen.de/anwendungen/openoffice_aus_inoffiziellen_paketen

They're updated on a unregularly basis.

Cheers
Lars


pgp24RDPMrV4W.pgp
Description: PGP signature


FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2010-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles.  In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments.  The most common problem is that recent versions
of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions.
The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386
architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more
of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as
size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth.

In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different
errors in different build environments.  The script that runs on the
build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to
help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide.

One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen
on the build farm.  Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this
algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at
this kind of thing.)

The errors are listed below.  In the case where the same problem
exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the
latest errorlog for that type.  (By 'build environment' here we
mean 'combination of 6.x/7.x/-current with target architecture'.)

(Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not
the error still applies to the latest version.  The program
that generates this report is not yet able to determine this
automatically.)

portname:   audio/audacious-crossfade
broken because: Does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=audacious-crossfade


portname:   audio/ccaudio
broken because: Does not build with libtool 2.2.
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=ccaudio


portname:   audio/py-libmpdclient
broken because: does not build
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/py26-libmpdclient-0.10.0.log
 (_Aug_23_08:38:53_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=py-libmpdclient


portname:   chinese/gbk2uni
broken because: does not fetch
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=gbk2uni


portname:   chinese/iiimf-le-xcin
broken because: does not build
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/zh-iiimf-le-xcin-0.1.7_5.log
 (_Aug_23_08:39:47_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=iiimf-le-xcin


portname:   comms/asmodem
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=commsportname=asmodem


portname:   comms/ltmdm
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=commsportname=ltmdm


portname:   comms/yawmppp
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=commsportname=yawmppp


portname:   databases/p5-sqlrelay
broken because: does not build
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20100103133538/p5-sqlrelay-0.41_2.log
 (_Dec_30_17:19:46_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databasesportname=p5-sqlrelay


portname:   devel/ace+tao
broken because: Does not compile on FreeBSD = 7.0
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=ace%2Btao


portname:   devel/adabindx
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=adabindx


portname:   devel/agide
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=agide


portname:   devel/asis
broken because: Does not build after gpl 2009 update to lang/gnat
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=asis


portname:   devel/callgrind
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=callgrind


portname:   devel/fampp
broken because: FAM system mismatch: gamin is installed, while desired
FAM system is fam
build errors:   none.
overview:   

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2010-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles.  In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments.  The most common problem is that recent versions
of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions.
The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386
architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more
of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as
size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth.

In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different
errors in different build environments.  The script that runs on the
build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to
help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide.

One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen
on the build farm.  Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this
algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at
this kind of thing.)

The errors are listed below.  In the case where the same problem
exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the
latest errorlog for that type.  (By 'build environment' here we
mean 'combination of 6.x/7.x/-current with target architecture'.)

(Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not
the error still applies to the latest version.  The program
that generates this report is not yet able to determine this
automatically.)

portname:   audio/audacious-crossfade
broken because: Does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=audacious-crossfade


portname:   audio/ccaudio
broken because: Does not build with libtool 2.2.
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=ccaudio


portname:   audio/dino
broken because: does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=dino


portname:   audio/ecamegapedal
broken because: does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=ecamegapedal


portname:   audio/ecawave
broken because: does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=ecawave


portname:   audio/emu10kx
broken because: does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=emu10kx


portname:   audio/gmpc-mserver
broken because: fails to build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=gmpc-mserver


portname:   audio/py-libmpdclient
broken because: does not build
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/py26-libmpdclient-0.10.0.log
 (_Aug_23_08:38:53_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=py-libmpdclient


portname:   biology/dotter
broken because: checksum mismatch
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20091229173723/dotter-20021204.log.bz2
 (_Nov_19_12:11:51_UTC_2009)
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/dotter-20021204.log
 (_Aug_17_05:33:45_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=biologyportname=dotter


portname:   cad/alliance
broken because: incomplete plist
build errors:
http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.7.20100101212416/alliance-5.0.20090901_1.log.bz2
 (_Dec_14_05:59:40_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=cadportname=alliance


portname:   chinese/gbk2uni
broken because: does not fetch
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=gbk2uni


portname:   chinese/iiimf-le-xcin
broken because: does not build
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/zh-iiimf-le-xcin-0.1.7_5.log
 (_Aug_23_08:39:47_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=iiimf-le-xcin


portname:   comms/asmodem
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=commsportname=asmodem


portname:   comms/hcfmdm
broken because: Does not compile at 7.x or higher
build errors:   none.
overview:   

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness.  Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on the existing port.  In some cases,
ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install
correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation.

The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled
for removal, are listed below.  If no one has stepped forward before
that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR),
the ports will be deleted.



portname:   audio/ccaudio
description:C++ class framework for manipulating audio files
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 4 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=ccaudio


portname:   audio/py-libmpdclient
description:Python bindings for libmpdclient
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/py26-libmpdclient-0.10.0.log
 (_Aug_23_08:38:53_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=py-libmpdclient


portname:   chinese/gbk2uni
description:TeX applet used to generate correct Chinese PDF
bookmarks
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 6 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=gbk2uni


portname:   chinese/iiimf-le-xcin
description:IIIMF xcin language engine, a traditional Chinese
input method
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/zh-iiimf-le-xcin-0.1.7_5.log
 (_Aug_23_08:39:47_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=iiimf-le-xcin


portname:   devel/adabindx
description:An Ada-binding to the X Window System and *tif
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=adabindx


portname:   devel/agide
description:A-A-P GUI IDE: a framework for software development
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 6 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=agide


portname:   devel/asis
description:GNAT implementation of the Ada Semantic Interface
Specification
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=asis


portname:   devel/callgrind
description:Valgrind skin for cache simulation and call tracing
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: Included in devel/valgrind
expiration date:2009-10-30
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=callgrind


portname:   devel/florist
description:FSU implementation of POSIX.5, the POSIX Ada binding
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=florist


portname:   editors/xml2rfc-xxe
description:An xml2rfc configuration for XMLMind XML Editor
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 4 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=editorsportname=xml2rfc-xxe


portname:   graphics/gephex
description:Software-based interactive video-effect system
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness.  Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on the existing port.  In some cases,
ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install
correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation.

The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled
for removal, are listed below.  If no one has stepped forward before
that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR),
the ports will be deleted.



portname:   audio/ccaudio
description:C++ class framework for manipulating audio files
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 4 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=ccaudio


portname:   audio/dino
description:A pattern-based MIDI sequencer
maintainer: tr...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 7 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=dino


portname:   audio/py-libmpdclient
description:Python bindings for libmpdclient
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/py26-libmpdclient-0.10.0.log
 (_Aug_23_08:38:53_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audioportname=py-libmpdclient


portname:   chinese/gbk2uni
description:TeX applet used to generate correct Chinese PDF
bookmarks
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 6 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=gbk2uni


portname:   chinese/iiimf-le-xcin
description:IIIMF xcin language engine, a traditional Chinese
input method
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2009081417/zh-iiimf-le-xcin-0.1.7_5.log
 (_Aug_23_08:39:47_UTC_2009)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chineseportname=iiimf-le-xcin


portname:   databases/mysql-connector-java50
description:MySQL Connector/J: JDBC interface for MySQL
maintainer: m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
deprecated because: Old version: please use databases/mysql-connector-java
instead
expiration date:2010-02-20
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databasesportname=mysql-connector-java50


portname:   databases/mysql60-client
description:Multithreaded SQL database (client)
maintainer: a...@freebsd.org
deprecated because: The MySQL 6.0 development branch is deprecated and
will be removed soon.  Please consider using MySQL 5.5
instead.
expiration date:2010-01-10
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databasesportname=mysql60-client


portname:   databases/mysql60-scripts
description:Multithreaded SQL database (scripts)
maintainer: a...@freebsd.org
deprecated because: The MySQL 6.0 development branch is deprecated and
will be removed soon.  Please consider using MySQL 5.5
instead.
expiration date:2010-01-10
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databasesportname=mysql60-scripts


portname:   databases/mysql60-server
description:Multithreaded SQL database (server)
maintainer: a...@freebsd.org
deprecated because: The MySQL 6.0 development branch is deprecated and
will be removed soon.  Please consider using MySQL 5.5
instead.
expiration date:2010-01-10
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databasesportname=mysql60-server


portname:   devel/adabindx
description:An Ada-binding to the X Window System and *tif
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
deprecated because: has been broken for 3 months
expiration date:2010-01-08
build errors:  

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

2010-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles.  Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.

An overview of each port, including errors seen on the build farm,
is included below.

portname:   misc/compat3x
forbidden because:  FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr, FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath  - not
fixed / no lib available
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=miscportname=compat3x
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2010-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles.  Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.

An overview of each port, including errors seen on the build farm,
is included below.

portname:   databases/gnats
forbidden because:  Security issues
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databasesportname=gnats


portname:   misc/compat3x
forbidden because:  FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr, FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath  - not
fixed / no lib available
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=miscportname=compat3x


portname:   www/firefox
forbidden because:  too many security issues 

http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/922d2398-9e2d-11de-a998-0030843d3802.html


http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/49e8f2ee-8147-11de-a994-0030843d3802.html
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=wwwportname=firefox
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org