On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:16:37PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
Mikle Krutov wrote:
Sorry, i've thought that everything needed
was included into config.log in first message.
Complete make log (e.g. make
configure.log) in attach.
The source-hightlight port is not broken. It builds fine
on
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:11:38PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:16:37PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
Mikle Krutov wrote:
Sorry, i've thought that everything needed
was included into config.log in first message.
Complete make log (e.g. make
configure.log) in
jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong but it is not going to
matter much to what extent a license has to do with this besides
ease of mind maybe. We would not be using the source for the VCS
in a repo that holds the source that is being distributed and
none of
Hi Wesley,
I've been playing with DHCPv6 and in doing so, ran into an apparent
problem with the net/isc-dhcp41-client port.
It currently overwrites the FreeBSD client script distributed by ISC
with a custom script client::scripts::freebsd which lives in the
net/isc-dhcp41-server port's files
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
As I understand it, what is being suggested is the adoption of a
new code base for a significant piece of infrastructure. I think
the proposal is at less risk of being summarily rejected if it can
viably be based on BSD-licensed
This dvcs is BSD licensed:
IMHO, if it's worth to change VCS, it would be much wiser to use well-known one
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
Regards,
After update from autoconf-2.62 to 2.67, I can't install samba3x ports
on FBSD6 machines, compilation failed with:
(I've tried other versions of samba3/31/32/33/34, problem is the same.
Downgrade of autoconf to version 2.62 helped. Only FBSD6 is affected,
FBSD7 works fine..)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
Given the amount of GPL'd software in the base system, why are we
already fighting over licensing? What is it with the open-source world
and obsessing with licensing? It should be up for discussion after
22.09.2010, 14:11, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com:
BSD license
has a particular advantage in embedded/black box systems, so not polluting
base with more viral licensing is pretty important to project as whole I
think.
Do embedded systems really need to use ports tree? I guess no, or
Sorry, but I think I should forward this to you as well.
Paolo Bormida
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paolo Bormida pborm...@gmail.com
Date: 2010/9/22
Subject: Question about amule port version
To: ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
Sorry to bother you, but I think I understood the
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:42:37 +0200, Paolo Bormida wrote
To: ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
Hi Paolo,
(this is a re-post of my previous, private answer)
I am sorry but I am no more the maintainer of aMule. You should get in touch
with swel...@gmail.com, who is the new maintainer.
Sorry to
Smells like Debian.
Smells like Slashdot.
I give up.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
Given the amount of GPL'd software in the base system, why are we
already
Paolo Bormida pborm...@gmail.com writes:
Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily
snapshot?
Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases
upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports.
http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update
in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in
port directory name and in LATEST_LINK.
Pass me pointyhat for not doing it when the port switched to use snapshots.
Nice to know that amule will get more frequent updates, and the new knobs
are great as well, but isn't risky to use snapshots for a port? Are there
any policies about what to base a port upon?
And yes, you are correct about the availability of the sparc64 packages.
Can the new knobs be used to
Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru writes:
* Anonymous (swel...@gmail.com) wrote:
Are such PITA to install games desired in the ports tree, anyway?
I think in this case -data port is not needed. Sources should be
packaged and put somewhere, and the game should show a pkg-message
with
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29:50PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
21.09.2010 12:05, David Southwell написав(ла):
Problem is opal does not compile due to failure which was in
original posting:
According to:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-latest-logs/opal-2.2.11_2.log.bz2
Opal
Paolo Bormida pborm...@gmail.com writes:
Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule?
No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX.
$ readelf -d $(which amulecmd) | fgrep wx
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Paolo Bormida pborm...@gmail.com writes:
Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule?
No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX.
^^^
Typo: without - with.
Perhaps, I misinterpreted your question and
Hi,
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recent version
fuse-2.8.4.tar.gz and available (?) for FreeBSD.
Hi,
I've got the port of mbuffer (/usr/ports/misc/mbuffer) installed on a
number of machines (amd64/FreeBSD 6.4-S, 7.2-S and 8.1-R) - but it seems to
have issues...
Firstly - any attempt to use the 'network' options of it, fail miserably
(this is where mbuffer sends the data via tcp,
Hello,
Fetched ports today :
=== Building for sessreg-1.0.5_1
/usr/bin/make all-am
cc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing -Wbad-function-cast -Wformat=2
David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
sessreg.o(.text+0xfa): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
: undefined reference to `setutxent'
sessreg.o(.text+0x101): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
: undefined reference to `getutxent'
sessreg.o(.text+0x12b): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
: undefined
Double answer:
The functions you see in amulecmd should be in wxbase and wx is not a
problem.
My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd, and I
think this can be done in amule calling configure like described in this
howto
Of course this would be useful to those who do wish not to install/start X
on a server, whether it be a i386/amd64 or a sparc64 or other architectures
that does not have a graphic card on the server (an headless machine) .
In this case would be useless to do a very long build of X11 and amule
Paolo Bormida pborm...@gmail.com writes:
My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd,
and I think this can be done in amule calling configure like
described in this howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/
HowTo_Compile_aMuled
Have you looked at x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 port?
The message while portupgrading bugzilla:
bugzilla-3.6.2_1 depends on package: p5-DBD-mysql=2.9003 - not found
Verifying reinstall for p5-DBD-mysql=2.9003 in
/usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql
p5-DBD-mysql-4.017 conflicts with installed package(s):
p5-DBD-mysql50-4.017
They install files
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:33:53 +0200
Alexandre axel...@ymail.com wrote:
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is
2010/9/22 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com:
David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
sessreg.o(.text+0xfa): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
: undefined reference to `setutxent'
sessreg.o(.text+0x101): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
: undefined reference to `getutxent'
sessreg.o(.text+0x12b): In
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:07:17 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Janne Snabb sn...@epipe.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
One issue with either Git or Mercurial is that they are GPL.
AFAIK FreeBSD prefers to avoid GPL in the base or in critical
widely-used
David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
I have them in /usr/include/utmpx.h
At configure stage :
checking utmpx.h usability... yes
checking utmpx.h presence... yes
checking for utmpx.h... yes
In config.log there is not something strange but if you want to check
it I attached it.
On 22.09.2010 22:24, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recent version
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:56:27 +0600
Sergey Nikolenko s...@swa.org.ru wrote:
On 22.09.2010 22:24, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the
22.09.2010 18:06, Karl Pielorz пишет:
Hi,
I've got the port of mbuffer (/usr/ports/misc/mbuffer) installed on a
number of machines (amd64/FreeBSD 6.4-S, 7.2-S and 8.1-R) - but it seems
to have issues...
Firstly - any attempt to use the 'network' options of it, fail miserably
(this is where
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Alexandre axel...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
On 23.09.2010 00:01, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recent
version
2010/9/22 Anonymous swel...@gmail.com:
David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
I have them in /usr/include/utmpx.h
At configure stage :
checking utmpx.h usability... yes
checking utmpx.h presence... yes
checking for utmpx.h... yes
In config.log there is not something strange but
On 22/09/2010 16:29:46, Tim Kellers wrote:
The message while portupgrading bugzilla:
bugzilla-3.6.2_1 depends on package: p5-DBD-mysql=2.9003 - not found
Verifying reinstall for p5-DBD-mysql=2.9003 in
/usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql
p5-DBD-mysql-4.017 conflicts with installed
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:52:02PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
There is no utmpx.h on 8.1-RELEASE.
Then it's there because I downgraded from -STABLE, then I should
remove it safely ?
When I do a source upgrade (which I do way more frequently than is
sane), I augment the
On 23.09.2010 02:08, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
On 23.09.2010 00:01, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Both versions also got this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149411
It is something wrong with sysutils/fusefs-kmod on 8.x
Hrm .. so is
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
On 23.09.2010 00:01, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Both versions also got this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149411
It is something wrong with sysutils/fusefs-kmod on 8.x
Hrm .. so is this a general FUSeFS problem? Or just a
No, never looked at wxgtk28 port and I understand it would be non trivial to
split it. Building it as part of amule would be better.
But I am not here to ask you to do that, just suggesting what might be
useful to people wishing to use amule on servers. On the other hand it is
true that compiling
Hello.
I'm using a 7.2/amd386 (soon to be 7.3) as PDC with Samba 3.0.37.
Since I have to add a Windows 7 machine, I need to upgrade to 3.4.x.
Is this as simple as removing the port and installing the new one?
I have no BDC, I'm not using LDAP or WinBind or anything fancy.
I do use pam_smb
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:04:08 +0200
Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote:
Hello.
I'm using a 7.2/amd386 (soon to be 7.3) as PDC with Samba 3.0.37.
Since I have to add a Windows 7 machine, I need to upgrade to 3.4.x.
Is this as simple as removing the port and installing the new one?
I
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29:50PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
21.09.2010 12:05, David Southwell написав(ла):
Problem is opal does not compile due to failure which was in
original posting:
According to:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-latest-logs/opal-2.2.11_2.l
Can a few folks who have reported failures with net/samba* since the update of
autoconf to 2.67 please mail me (not the list) the output from the following
commands:
cd /usr/ports/net/whatever-samba-you're-using
make showconfig
make configure
and I can probably put a
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: libaacplus-1.0.5: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/autoconf262
Committers on the hook:
ade amdmi3 pgollucci
Most recent CVS update was:
U LEGAL
U MOVED
U
47 matches
Mail list logo
