On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:45:30PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
Both portmaster and portupgrade have 'package' mode, which uses
packages when available. If one can live with default optimization
(which is usually good anyways) and if most times the default options
would satisfy his/her need, or if
- no 'make clean' and reusing the object files of the current version for
building the new, updated,
version. That should save significant compilation time. Does that work as
of today?
I doubt that that will work in that form. In fact, I quite like that
'make clean' in ports throws away
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:27:51AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:54:36PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
Changing to a hypothetical example, why would an Apache vulnerability in
mod_rewrite in the least bit bother a person
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org wrote:
Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round,
whether it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and
interference, I'd install Ubuntu.
No,
Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:27:51AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:54:36PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
Changing to a hypothetical example, why would an Apache vulnerability in
mod_rewrite in the least bit
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
I notice, that many software projects are hosted on social DVCS
hostings nowadays.
Other common feature among them is absence of official tarballs
for versions. I don't say, that ALL projects whith primary hosting on
these DVCS sites don't publish official tarballs. But
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
Why some groups of sites in ports system are make variables and some --
special
strings?
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: german/ksteak
description:KDE frontend for steak, an english - german dictionary
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
deprecated because: Development has ceased.
expiration date:2011-09-01
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org wrote:
Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
What the current FreeBSD policy of actively deleting perfectly
usable ports instead of putting a mild hurdle in the way is saying,
is that FreeBSD will stop me doing
Hi all,
I wanted to propose the addition of a standalone mksh in shells/, which , of
course, is compiled with -static and installs to /bin . Attached is the
modified Makefile.
Thanks,
--
Rares Aioanei
Makefile
Description: Binary data
___
Hi,
Since upgrading to version 5.7, the Gauge32 of .1.3.6.1.2.1.6.9.0
(TCP-MIB::tcpCurrEstab.0) only returns zero.
Tested on 8.2-RELEASE-p2 with 5.7_3 today.
--
Med venlig hilsen - Sincerely
Uffe R. B. Andersen - mailto:u...@twe.net
http://blog.andersen.nu/
On 09/08/11 17:54, Matthias Andree wrote:
The port isn't perfectly usable (because that would mean it's usable in
all circumstances for all advertised purposes, which is explicitly not
the case in the light of known vulnerabilities).
In British Engligh at least, perfectly can mean adequately
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:30:52PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
I notice, that many software projects are hosted on social DVCS
hostings nowadays.
Other common feature among them is absence of official tarballs
for versions. I don't say, that ALL projects whith
Lev Serebryakov wrote on 09.09.2011 14:35:
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
Why some groups of sites in ports system are make variables and some --
special
strings?
They are not. You can use both ${MASTER_SITE_GNU} and just GNU (it will
expanded automatically to corresponding make variable). Just
When reinstalling net/clamz I noticed that it is necessary to have a cookie
from the local amazon site (amazon.com, amazon.de) confirming that the amazon
downloader is installed when in fact it is not and you are using clamz.
That information will only be accessible from the project website,
The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
really important.
With github this fortunately is a non-issue. Even though they autogenerate their
tar balls, they keep enough information to
Hello, Baptiste.
You wrote 9 сентября 2011 г., 17:04:58:
The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
really important.
I've thought about checksums, but my simple experiment shows, that
I've thought about checksums, but my simple experiment shows, that
tag-related (not tip-related, of course) archives give same chsum
after re-downloading in short time. But I don't check it for long-term
stability.
Well, let's do at least one check with a one and a half year old tar ball.
Hello, Klaus.
You wrote 9 сентября 2011 г., 17:24:37:
* due to autogeneration, you're quite likely to get a http-redirect,
Does fetch support redirects?
* filenames like 2011.07.25 are not too suitable for a distfile.
DIST_SUBIDR=${PORTNAME} is solution for this.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev
* due to autogeneration, you're quite likely to get a http-redirect,
Does fetch support redirects?
Yes. But for good reasons, Mk/bsd.ports.mk contains the line
FETCH_ARGS?=-AFpr
Note the -A. Of course, it's no problem to make an exception for github, but
at least, one should be aware of
Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:17:09PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi, for me it's too many time has passed for maintainer timeout.
Please commit this anybody, until this port wasn't removed because
it doesn't builds with some NOTEXISTENT PostgreSQL version.
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:24:37PM +0100, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
really important.
With github this fortunately is a non-issue. Even
Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:26:13PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
3. postgresql9x-client unbreak:
Taking those three. Will test them on the coming Monday
and will commit afterwards.
Hmm, actually only
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159844
the others are already committed.
Hello, FreeBSD.
New revision of this vital port.
Changes:
(1) No external FreeBSD hack patch anymore -- ${PATCH_DIR} located
extra-patches instead.
(2) FreeBSD hacks splitted into three:
(a) Perforce-style conflict markers
(b) Enhanced keywords
(c) FreeBSD-specific
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote on 09.09.2011 18:38:
Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:26:13PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
3. postgresql9x-client unbreak:
Taking those three. Will test them on the coming Monday
and will commit afterwards.
Hmm, actually only
Good day,
I'm the current maintainer (as of July 2011) of mod_gnutls.
I have noticed that you are responsible the FreeBSD port, and have
include the current version (0.5.10).
I greatly appreciate your help.
The latest tarball can be downloaded from mod_gnutls' official page at:
Until recently, github required two requests to get a tarball: one to
initiate the tarball creation, the other to download it.
Yes, that's what I remember. The URL you got after the first redirect
was then good for a couple of days -- till eventually it wasn't used
for long enough time and the
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0100, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
* due to autogeneration, you're quite likely to get a http-redirect,
Does fetch support redirects?
Yes. But for good reasons, Mk/bsd.ports.mk contains the line
FETCH_ARGS?=-AFpr
Note the -A. Of course, it's no
Am 09.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org wrote:
Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round,
whether it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying
Am 09.09.2011 14:38, schrieb Matt Burke:
If someone deletes a package I use from ports, they are FORCING me to jump
through an awful load of hoops to get what I want/need.
No. If people would please take note that the package does *not*
magically disappear from your computers because someone
Am 09.09.2011 13:15, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: german/ksteak
description:KDE frontend for steak, an english - german dictionary
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
deprecated because:
Le mar 6 sep 11 à 17:10:01 +0200, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it
écrivait :
Hello.
Hello,
Port is at 6.3, but 6.5.1 is out.
Is upgrading under way or planned?
Yes, I know, but unfortunately I have been too busy. Hope to work on it
RSN. Anyway, patches are welcome!
Regards,
--
Th.
Could someone please place the latest devel/git distfiles on the local
mirrors, so that they are available while kernel.org is recovering
from being hacked? The github mirror only has gzipped development
tarballs, that don't work with the current ports Makefile.
b.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:37:08PM +, b. f. wrote:
Could someone please place the latest devel/git distfiles on the local
mirrors, so that they are available while kernel.org is recovering
from being hacked? The github mirror only has gzipped development
tarballs, that don't work with the
On 9/9/2011 7:35 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to propose the addition of a standalone mksh in shells/, which , of
course, is compiled with -static and installs to /bin . Attached is the
modified Makefile.
Thanks,
Aioanei,
No attachment, I think it got filtered out by the
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:37:08PM +, b. f. wrote:
Could someone please place the latest devel/git distfiles on the local
mirrors, so that they are available while kernel.org is recovering
from being hacked? The github mirror only has gzipped development
tarballs, that don't work with the
On 9/9/11 9:48 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 9/9/2011 7:35 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote:
Attached is the modified Makefile.
Thanks,
Aioanei,
No attachment, I think it got filtered out by the list.
I received the Makefile.
--
Glen Barber
___
Hallo,
I recently had a quick look at net/librsync and was puzzled that
it installs rdiff, but not the man page for rdiff. Looking at the
history, this has happened with the update to 0.9.6, submitted in
PR ports/55469 [1]. However, I fail to see the reason for removing
the man page. Leaving it
I wanted to propose the addition of a standalone mksh in shells/, which , of
course, is compiled with -static and installs to /bin . Attached is the
modified Makefile.
1) Please submit unified diffs, not entire files. It makes it easier
to see what changed and it makes it easier to actually
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:29:15 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 09.09.2011 13:15, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
portname: german/ksteak
description:KDE frontend for steak, an
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:05:49 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 09.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org wrote:
No, you'd use a managed installation. Nobody stands there
pointing a gun at
41 matches
Mail list logo
