Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-qt5-core / Py36-qt5-core

Hi D.-C. M., hi others, Am 27.03.2018 um 23:49 schrieb Guido Falsi: On 03/27/18 22:44, D.-C. M. wrote: Hello, Hi! At this moment, it is impossible to build side by side py27-qt5-core and py36-qt5-core. There is a collison on /usr/local/bin/pyuic This is annoying… Python 27

Re: Committer needed for upgrade of port of Perl library List-Compare

Hi! > > I filed this BZ ticket two months ago, but it has not been responded to:: > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225469 > > misc/p5-List-Compare: update to 0.53 > > > > Could someone please investigate? > > I'm looking into this. As the version step-up is several

Re: Committer needed for upgrade of port of Perl library List-Compare

Hi! > I filed this BZ ticket two months ago, but it has not been responded to:: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225469 > misc/p5-List-Compare: update to 0.53 > > Could someone please investigate? I'm looking into this. As the version step-up is several versions, did you

[CFT] Mesa 18.0.0 update (mesa-libs, mesa-dri, libosmesa, clover)

Mesa provides OpenGL drivers for Intel and AMD cards on FreeBSD. Recently, a new major version was released. So far it was only tested by drm-next-kmod. Can someone test on FreeBSD < 11.2 for regressions? In case of issues attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log, run with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose and check if

Re: Heads-up: linker (lld) changes for amd64 coming soon

(Moved from -current to -ports) On 27 March 2018 at 13:15, Ed Maste wrote: > > Fair enough - this was the reason I sent the email. I've now gone > through and submitted a PR for for each failure that did not already > have one. I've also added LLD_UNSAFE to a few ports where

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-qt5-core / Py36-qt5-core

On 03/27/2018 15:06, Guido Falsi wrote: On 03/28/18 00:00, Pete Wright wrote: I'm not a python expert, but I understand that python 2.7 and python 3 are two slightly different languages not fully compatible with each other. I also understand(but have not gone into depth about this) that

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-qt5-core / Py36-qt5-core

On 03/28/18 00:00, Pete Wright wrote: >> I'm not a python expert, but I understand that python 2.7 and python 3 >> are two slightly different languages not fully compatible with each >> other. >> >> I also understand(but have not gone into depth about this) that there is >> some resistance to

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-qt5-core / Py36-qt5-core

On 03/27/2018 14:49, Guido Falsi wrote: On 03/27/18 22:44, D.-C. M. wrote: Hello, Hi! At this moment, it is impossible to build side by side py27-qt5-core and py36-qt5-core. There is a collison on /usr/local/bin/pyuic This is annoying… Python 27 is still the default, but

Re: FreeBSD Port: py27-qt5-core / Py36-qt5-core

On 03/27/18 22:44, D.-C. M. wrote: > Hello, > Hi! >   > > At this moment, it is impossible to build side by side py27-qt5-core and > py36-qt5-core. > >   > > There is a collison on /usr/local/bin/pyuic > >   > > This is annoying… Python 27 is still the default, but become quite old now. >

Committer needed for upgrade of port of Perl library List-Compare

I filed this BZ ticket two months ago, but it has not been responded to:: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225469 misc/p5-List-Compare: update to 0.53 Could someone please investigate? Thank you very much. Jim Keenan ___

Committer needed for updates of two ports

www/carbonapi: Update to 0.11.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226935 databases/go-carbon: Improve rc.d script. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226937 Thank you! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

perl5.24 build failing on a new 11.1-STABLE install

Hi, I have just recently installed 11.1-STABLE on one of me laptops (Lenovo T470s) and when I attempt to build the perl5.24 port it errors out with this: --- perl --- cc -o perl -lpthread -Wl,-E -fstack-protector-strong -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.24/mach/CORE

Re: Removal of www/apache22

I support removal On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:11 AM Vincent Hoffman-Kazlauskas < vi...@unsane.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 27/03/2018 13:52, Bernard Spil wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just noticed that the Apache project has removed the patches they had > > for 2.2.34. > > > >

Re: Removal of www/apache22

On 27/03/2018 13:52, Bernard Spil wrote: > Hi all, > > Just noticed that the Apache project has removed the patches they had > for 2.2.34. > >     http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.34/ > > Combined with the security update of 2.4 branch to 2.4.33 leads me to > believe that

Re: Two pkg(8) repo configs pointing to same repo

On 27/03/2018 13:56, Anthony Jenkins via freebsd-ports wrote: Is there a way to configure a pkg(8) repo such that it has multiple ways to refer to the same physical repository?  I'm picturing the "url:" parameter being either a string or a list of strings: That isn't possible with pkg(8) at

Two pkg(8) repo configs pointing to same repo

I've set up a poudriere package server on my home FreeBSD desktop.  My laptop has two ways to access this server, depending on whether it's inside or outside my home LAN (thanks to my stupid ISP router).  When I'm on my home network, I have to use its local IP address (e.g. 192.168.1.5, or the

Removal of www/apache22

Hi all, Just noticed that the Apache project has removed the patches they had for 2.2.34. http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.34/ Combined with the security update of 2.4 branch to 2.4.33 leads me to believe that Apache 2.2 is now vulnerable and no patches will be

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,