Hello!
I'm creating OpenOffice 3.1.1 packages for FreeBSD-8-RELEASE, for i686
cpu.
CPUTYPE?=i686
In few hours my work will be finished. I've found site that would host
these packages [Linux Center of Latvia Univercity], but they want some
FreeBSD developer to verify quality of my builds, before
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:01 -0800
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:01 -0800
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
If it depended on OpenJDK by default it wouldn't be a problem. I do not
know
kazehakase-0.5.4_6, FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT ia64
I'm not really sure what to look for in debugger:
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it
On 11/26/09, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to find and
build from java-land from Sun? Anything??
It defines
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:35:51AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
kazehakase-0.5.4_6, FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT ia64
I'm not really sure what to look for in debugger:
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:50:35 +0200, Balogh Szabolcs wrote:
It is possible to spli Quassel-IRC into:
- quassel-core (maybe a statically linked version, which doesn't
require QT)
building quassel-core still requires non-gui Qt libraries, you have to install
Qt anyway.
- quassel-client
-
Hi Daisuke Aoyama and list
I'm trying run iSCSI target on my -CURRENT box
%uname -a
FreeBSD current.domain 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #6
r198480: Tue Nov 3 10:03:09 EET 2009
r...@current.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERN amd64
%pkg_info -xI istgt
istgt-20090428 An iSCSI target for
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:19AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 11/26/09, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to find and
Quoting Gary Kline kl...@thought.org:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:19AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 11/26/09, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
Okay, so what does this
* Aldis Berjoza killasmur...@gmail.com [26.11.2009. @10:12:53 +0200]:
Hello!
I'm creating OpenOffice 3.1.1 packages for FreeBSD-8-RELEASE, for i686
cpu.
CPUTYPE?=i686
In few hours my work will be finished. I've found site that would host
these packages [Linux Center of Latvia
Hi,
Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
symbols?
Habitually I've just run make configure and then edited Makefiles.
But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
Thanks,
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucasmwlu...@blackhelicopters.org
2009/11/26 Michael W. Lucas mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org:
Hi,
Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
symbols?
Habitually I've just run make configure and then edited Makefiles.
But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
Just adding -g to CFLAGS
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
symbols?
Habitually I've just run make configure and then edited Makefiles.
But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
make -DWITH_DEBUG, according to
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 18:01 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
2009/11/26 Michael W. Lucas mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org:
Hi,
Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
symbols?
Habitually I've just run make configure and then edited Makefiles.
But I'm sure that's not
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 18:10, Michael W. Lucas
mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org wrote:
Hi,
Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
symbols?
Habitually I've just run make configure and then edited Makefiles.
But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:35 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
kazehakase-0.5.4_6, FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT ia64
I'm not really sure what to look for in debugger:
You want to to recompile at a lower optimization level and with
debugging enabled (i.e. -O0 -g). If you can't reproduce the
problem this way,
Foks,
The current status of the issue is as follows:
*) I've contacted a boost team, they suggested a smaller patch
*) I've applied a patch, this allows code to build, but one the tests for
the patched code (in libs/smart_ptr/test) fail. This is not one of the
tests that were expected to fail
Folks,
I'd like to share the current status of devel/boost-* ports.
In brief, the patch for updating is ready, many ports build successfully,
but there are two failures caused by the update. One of them is severe and
hard to fix. The boost team is informed.
More information, the patch, build
Hi,
Is there a maintainer for net-mgmt/netdisco? We just released 1.0 which
has 3+ years of improvements and bug fixes, and it would be great to
have the FreeBSD port updated. Note that net-mgmt/p5-SNMP-Info is half
of Netdisco and appears to have been updated recently by jadawin.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:15:50AM -0800, Max Baker wrote:
Is there a maintainer for net-mgmt/netdisco?
nope, it's listed as po...@freebsd.org which is the place-holder
address (signifies unmaintained). So, it's ready for adoption :-)
mcl
___
Max Baker wrote:
Hi,
Is there a maintainer for net-mgmt/netdisco? We just released 1.0 which
has 3+ years of improvements and bug fixes, and it would be great to
have the FreeBSD port updated. Note that net-mgmt/p5-SNMP-Info is half
of Netdisco and appears to have been updated recently by
With the impending public release of 8.0-RELEASE, we decided to lift the
soft freeze that was in effect on the Ports Collection in past weeks.
The ports tree is now fully open to commits.
--
Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz
p...@freebsd.org
The Linimon's Rule: The More You Close, The
The new addition to Makefile on /lib/libthr -Wl,-znodlopen
Breaks php4 and mhash on my current 1386
I'm sure other ports that use it are broken too as can't load the lib.
Remove -Wl,-znodlopen and everything works again.
Manfred
==
|| n...@pozo.com
Dear Sir,
I found the following ports in FreeBSD was maintained by you.
/usr/ports/security/nikto
In 10/062007, the nikto has released Ver 2.1.0
In this new release, it has many bugs fixed and new features.
Could you please update the nikto in FreeBSD port
tree to version Ver
25 matches
Mail list logo
