Re: Feedback on wanted port: obskurator

2010-08-16 Thread Frederic Culot
Thanks for your feedback but unfortunately the result is the same even if I provide the prototype for printf in the source file. Frederic Frederic Culot frede...@culot.org wrote: Following the links on the ports tasks wiki page I found 'obskurator' to be a wanted port ... so I gave it a

textproc/soprano linking problem

2010-08-16 Thread Dominic Fandrey
I wanted to switch to the new k3b-kde4. I ran through a couple of problems, most of them ports not accepting spaces in CC, but there's a soprano issue I don't get through to: Linking CXX executable sopranod cd

Re: It's annoying when something other than rsyncd listens on tco/873

2010-08-16 Thread Jyoti Sharma
I would prefer this approach: amd.conf has the option preferred_amq_port to specify the listening port. Don't know about ypbind. It is not just rsyncd that can get disturbed. Grabbing arbitrary port without consulting /etc/services and the startup scripts is a bad idea for any service.

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2010-08-16 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and

Re: Wvdial

2010-08-16 Thread Chris Rees
I'll see if it's within my capabilities. Chris Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do threading. On 16 Aug 2010 02:22, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 04:11:09PM +, John Sherman wrote: If Wvdial is returned to

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-16 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 8/13/2010 11:51 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mike Jakubik mike.jaku...@intertainservices.com wrote: Thanks for the info. Do you think this may be a usefull feature for other users coming from portupgrade though? If there is an option to always rebuild, one

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-16 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 12/08/2010 20:11, Anonymous wrote: Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de writes: On 07/08/2010 02:46, Adam Vande More wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 08/06/2010 15:03, Adam Vande More wrote: for pkg in /var/db/pkg/* ; do pkg_create

net/asterisk16

2010-08-16 Thread Матковский Александр
Hello. Can you tell me when planed adding asterisk 1.6.2 in ports Freebsd?. I try write to maintainer: sobo...@freebsd.org, but received error: 550 sender or recipient address is wrong Thank you! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: It's annoying when something other than rsyncd listens on tco/873

2010-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 8/15/2010 10:49 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: The most straightforward way to make this a non-issue (it seems to me) would be to start rsyncd(8) before other services that grab arbitrary ports; however, the start-up script for rsyncd s[ecifies: # PROVIDE: rsyncd # REQUIRE: LOGIN # BEFORE:

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-16 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote: I wasn't aware that pkg_create can create several packages at once, thanks for that! I'm not quite sure how pkg_create creates a package, but it if does use make package-noinstall be aware that it have a bug that

Re: DEPRECATE and a master/slave port

2010-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 8/13/2010 11:25 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: I want to DEPRECATE security/barnyard. It's a master port. The slave is security/barnyard-sguil. Is it sufficient to DEPRECATE and EXPIRE the master? Or do I need to do that to the slave as well? The simplest and best way to answer this question is

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-16 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 16/08/2010 22:09, Christer Solskogen wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote: I wasn't aware that pkg_create can create several packages at once, thanks for that! I'm not quite sure how pkg_create creates a package, but it if does use make

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-16 Thread Olivier Smedts
2010/8/6 Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com: I've been using ports-mgmt/portupgrade pretty much ever since it started to exist. Unfortunately portupgrade seems to be pretty much abandonware so I've been told to move on to portmaster. Despite the very long manpage I can't seem to be

[portmaster] navigation in the man page

2010-08-16 Thread Anonymous
Am I the only one who finds it hard to navigate in portmaster(8)? - options are neither sorted alphabetically nor grouped in blocks[1] - too little space between an option and its description - inconsistent in using terms (flags vs. options) - being too verbose about port-related terms[2] -

Re: DEPRECATE and a master/slave port

2010-08-16 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, August 16, 2010 14:09:29 -0700 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 8/13/2010 11:25 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: I want to DEPRECATE security/barnyard. It's a master port. The slave is security/barnyard-sguil. Is it sufficient to DEPRECATE and EXPIRE the master? Or do I need to

Re: Feedback on wanted port: obskurator

2010-08-16 Thread Shaun Amott
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Frederic Culot wrote: As a conclusion I would say that 'obskurator' should be removed from the wanted port page at http://wiki.freebsd.org/AndrewPantyukhin/Ports as it does not manage to generate compilable obfuscated code as it claims to do.

Re: It's annoying when something other than rsyncd listens on tco/873

2010-08-16 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:49:32PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: [... rsyncd(8) port -- 873/tcp -- grabbed by either ypbind or amd before rsynd started, so rsyncd isn't functional -- and doesn't whine about it or terminate] Thanks for the suggestions so far. Unfortunately, I'm finding

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 8/16/2010 3:04 PM, Olivier Smedts wrote: I'm quite late, and won't speak for batch, With portmaster 3.0 it should no longer be necessary. The option to stop displaying config menus is now 100% effective. but here is what I use with portmaster. I switched recently from portupgrade to

Re: It's annoying when something other than rsyncd listens on tco/873

2010-08-16 Thread jhell
On 08/16/2010 01:49, David Wolfskill wrote: My build machine is noisy generates heat, so I leave it powered off when it's not actively in use. As a consequence, it gets rebooted rather often. It is configured to run rsyncd(8) so I can update my laptop's local mirror of the FreeBSD SVN

Re: [portmaster] navigation in the man page

2010-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
It's customary to cc the maintainer of a port when you're commenting on it. Even more so when the maintainer is also the software author. I usually keep up on the lists, but there are times when it falls lower on the priority list so copying me on the message will ensure I can see it in a

Re: It's annoying when something other than rsyncd listens on tco/873

2010-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/16/2010 17:20, jhell wrote: The problem that I came across was that /usr/local/etc/rc.d is parsed long after /etc/rc.d contents This hasn't been true for a very long time. I first added the code to incorporate the local scripts into the base rcorder almost 5 years ago. so adding the

Re: It's annoying when something other than rsyncd listens on tco/873

2010-08-16 Thread RW
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:20:31 -0400 jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: The problem that I came across was that /usr/local/etc/rc.d is parsed long after /etc/rc.d contents so adding the BEFORE to the rsync start script would not help or didn't at that time. That only matters if you need to sort

Re: ports/149475: Update port: sysutils/p5-Sys-Filesystem

2010-08-16 Thread linimon
Synopsis: Update port: sysutils/p5-Sys-Filesystem Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 17 02:01:19 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Canonicalize assignment.

portmaster always re-installs some ports

2010-08-16 Thread Charlie Kester
A while back I aborted a recursive update (bad idea, I know now) and must have messed up something in whatever info portmaster uses to decide whether to re-install a port. Now, whenever I use portmaster -a, it re-installs py26-imaging, py26-reportlab and py26-xml. Every time. And it's a

Re: portmaster always re-installs some ports

2010-08-16 Thread Charlie Kester
On Mon 16 Aug 2010 at 19:48:23 PDT Charlie Kester wrote: A while back I aborted a recursive update (bad idea, I know now) and must have messed up something in whatever info portmaster uses to decide whether to re-install a port. Now, whenever I use portmaster -a, it re-installs py26-imaging,

Re: portmaster always re-installs some ports

2010-08-16 Thread b. f.
A while back I aborted a recursive update (bad idea, I know now) and must have messed up something in whatever info portmaster uses to decide whether to re-install a port. Now, whenever I use portmaster -a, it re-installs py26-imaging, py26-reportlab and py26-xml. From portmaster(8):

Re: [portmaster] navigation in the man page

2010-08-16 Thread Anonymous
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes: - inconsistent in using terms (flags vs. options) Again, snarky; but I will take a look at making this usage more consistent. Personally I have always used these terms interchangeably, but I could have been wrong about it all this time. :) The average

Re: portmaster always re-installs some ports

2010-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/16/2010 20:07, Charlie Kester wrote: On Mon 16 Aug 2010 at 19:48:23 PDT Charlie Kester wrote: A while back I aborted a recursive update (bad idea, I know now) Well not always, but apparently it was this time. :) and must have messed up something in whatever info portmaster uses to

Re: [portmaster] navigation in the man page

2010-08-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/16/2010 20:42, Anonymous wrote: Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org writes: - inconsistent in using terms (flags vs. options) Again, snarky; but I will take a look at making this usage more consistent. Personally I have always used these terms interchangeably, but I could have been wrong