Hi,
I noticed that someone has removed sysutils/ltrace for some reason.
However for me this software works very well and I am not aware of
any replacement. (Please point me to a replacement if there is one.)
There was lots of discussion recently about deprecating ports and
someone mentioned that
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> Is there any way to substitute dependencies, in cases where the substitute
> would work as well or better?
We do not currently handle this very well. portmaster attempts to
emulate this feature by comparing CONFLICTS lines.
There have been
Is there any way to substitute dependencies, in cases where the substitute
would work as well or better?
First case I think of is the misc/freebsd-doc-* ports which want links1, which
would be redundant if I already have lynx installed, or lynx and seamonkey too.
I don't really like links1, pre
I tried to build swfdec and gnash and failed with
===> pulseaudio-0.9.22_1 depends on shared library: ck-connector.0 - found
===> pulseaudio-0.9.22_1 depends on shared library: jack.0 - not found
===>Verifying install for jack.0 in /BETA1/usr/ports/audio/jack
===> jackit-0.118.0_4 depend
Hello,
I just ran into a problem building the latest version of bsd-grep on my
VPS running FreeBSD 8.0. It looks like the conditional for using lzma
from ports on systems without it in the base system is only adding the
include path and not adding the library path. I was able to fix this by
adding
Today, I discovered by accident that having setuid option set on
xorg-server -- which is the default option -- may be dangerous. (I guess
you all knew that already :-).
Another logged in user "killed" my screen by typing:
X :1
After turning setuid off, this denial of service attack was not possi
18.09.2011 04:46, Eugene Grosbein пишет:
> 18.09.2011 04:36, Florian Smeets пишет:
>> Hi,
>>
>> now that AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed, do we still need AquaGatekeeper?
>>
>> I'm currently usure what to do with these PRs.
>
> I don't get why AquaGatekeeper2 in spite of PR fixing it:
I don't g
18.09.2011 04:36, Florian Smeets пишет:
> Hi,
>
> now that AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed, do we still need AquaGatekeeper?
>
> I'm currently usure what to do with these PRs.
I don't get why AquaGatekeeper2 in spite of PR fixing it:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/160273
Tha
Doesn't fsc use pidfiles, unlike daemontools?
Jos
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi there...
Thanks for making this available.
I have been monitoring this list, and i would help in testing this.
Is there anything you want me to test in particular?
I am using in both of my systems FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 and both have the
base openssh 5.4p1.
My plan is to upgrade to the ports ve
Hi there...
Thanks for making this available.
I have been monitoring this list, and i would help in testing this.
Is there anything you want me to test in particular?
I am using in both of my systems FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 and both have the
base openssh 5.4p1.
My plan is to upgrade to the ports ve
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 16.09.2011 22:00, schrieb Gabor Kovesdan:
> >On 2011.09.16. 17:51, Matthias Andree wrote:
> >>Am 16.09.2011 11:51, schrieb Lev Serebryakov:
> >>>Hello, Freebsd-ports.
> >>>You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 0:28:07:
> >>>
> >Real
Am 16.09.2011 22:00, schrieb Gabor Kovesdan:
On 2011.09.16. 17:51, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 16.09.2011 11:51, schrieb Lev Serebryakov:
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 0:28:07:
Really? I thought it was supposed to be standard behaviour- the
@stopdaemon
line in pkg-plist
Greetings,
after "portsnap fetch update ; portmaster -da", I've run lib_pkgchk from
bsdadminutils; and I've received these complaints:
gnome-settings-daemon-2.32.1_2:
/usr/local/lib/gnome-settings-daemon-2.0/libmedia-keys.so misses libgdbm.so.3
vinagre-2.30.3: /usr/local/bin/vinagre misses libgd
> On 09/15/11 07:06, chukharev at mail.ru wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There have been a discussion about finding interdependencies of ports.
> > I have a relatively simple Python script for that. There is a pr
> > ports/160007
> > to add its early version. Unfortunately, I missed a reply to it, so
> > t
15 matches
Mail list logo