On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:46:07PM -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 January 2012 08:28:38 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> > > Subbsd wrote:
> > > > I found two broken rebuild after upgrade xcb:
> > > >
> > > pkg_libchk from sysutil
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 05:46:07PM -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 January 2012 08:28:38 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> > Subbsd wrote:
> > > I found two broken rebuild after upgrade xcb:
> > >
> > pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts would point you to all ports
> > that should be rebuil
in manually trying to build an index for a tinderbox/binary/portmaster
distribution, I started to look at some of the things that slow these down.
and, being a former real-time, robotics guy... I figure, take ONE line
of code out, and you make things faster.
anyway, worth the cycles?
take out
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 08:28:38 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Subbsd wrote:
> > I found two broken rebuild after upgrade xcb:
> >
> > 1) vlc doesn't build (
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164268 )
> > 2) kalzium doesn't build ( It is corrected after force rebuild
> > some
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:43:27PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Take a look at pkg_chklib. It is quite optimized and runs multiple
> checks in parallel so that you can run it on 1100 ports in about 1.5
> minutes.
I've looked at it. From the samples and do
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Carmel wrote:
> On another thread I noticed a reference to "pkg_libchk". I was
> interested in seeing what it would disclose on my system, so I ran it.
>
> pkg_libchk -Rrv
>
> It produced a great deal of output. This is one section dealing with
> "Firefox"
>
> fir
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other
> people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly
> developed by Fedora.
Correct. dougb has pointed this out before and no one has taken the
--On January 18, 2012 9:09:10 PM + Chris Rees wrote:
I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other
people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly
developed by Fedora.
I'm not sure I follow. If Fedora is making an rpm available for downloa
On 01/18/2012 04:34, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Nikola Lečić wrote:
>> Anyway, it wasn't clear from the bsd.licenses.mk that we should
>> use 'multi' in situations of 'any later version'. This means that
>> all licensing info of eg. GPL2+ ports must be updated when GPL4
>> appears...
>
> No, we shou
On 17 Jan 2012 08:32, wrote:
>
> Jason Helfman wrote:
> > I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that
> > MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port.
> >
> > Any objection to moving this site-index into
x11-themes/bluecurve-themes,
> > and removing from bsd.sites.mk?
> >
> > There
I wanted to try using ASSP with my Postfix installation. Apparently,
the older single threaded version is the one available in the ports
system. Are there any plans to either update it to ASSP V2 or add it as
a new port?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd
On 2012-01-18 12:36, Good ol' boy wrote:
I wanted to try using ASSP with my Postfix installation. Apparently,
the older single threaded version is the one available in the ports
system. Are there any plans to either update it to ASSP V2 or add it
as
a new port?
Thanks!
I don't have any plans
Hi,
I'm trying to compile a C++ software on FreeBSD. While compiling, this
error shows up:
error: stray '\357' in program
error: stray '\273' in program
error: stray '\277' in program
This file is reported (by file[1]) to be "UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) C
program text, with CRLF line terminators" w
Hi Lyubomir,
On Jan 16, 2012, at 08:14, Lyubomir Grigorov wrote:
>> I do not currently have any plans for a irc/bitlbee-devel port - I simply do
>> not have the time to maintain it. Sorry.
> Skype protocol is included by default in 3.0.4. I don't think the port builds
> it (and thus PC-BSD PBI a
Wesley Shields wrote on 18.01.2012 19:28:
I've got a patch to update sudo to the latest 1.8.4 beta (b5) available
at [1]. There's lots of changes in this release and I want to give
people who run more complex sudo installs than I do a chance to test it
out. I'd appreciate people running this upda
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:28:33AM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
> I've got a patch to update sudo to the latest 1.8.4 beta (b5) available
> at [1]. There's lots of changes in this release and I want to give
> people who run more complex sudo installs than I do a chance to test it
> out. I'd appreci
I've got a patch to update sudo to the latest 1.8.4 beta (b5) available
at [1]. There's lots of changes in this release and I want to give
people who run more complex sudo installs than I do a chance to test it
out. I'd appreciate people running this update and reporting back with
either success or
Kevin Oberman wrote:
I have just been cleaning up the mess caused by the upgrade of xcb-utils.
On my systmes I have hundreds of ports that will be re-built by the methods
listed in UPDATING, even though the vast majority of them are only
dependent on other ports that are dependent on xcb-utils, b
Subbsd wrote:
I found two broken rebuild after upgrade xcb:
1) vlc doesn't build (
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164268 )
2) kalzium doesn't build ( It is corrected after force rebuild
something from ocaml\* or
facile\*)
pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts would point y
On another thread I noticed a reference to "pkg_libchk". I was
interested in seeing what it would disclose on my system, so I ran it.
pkg_libchk -Rrv
It produced a great deal of output. This is one section dealing with
"Firefox"
firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/components/libbrow
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 03:07:09 you wrote:
> I found two broken rebuild after upgrade xcb:
>
> 1) vlc doesn't build (
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164268 )
> 2) kalzium doesn't build ( It is corrected after force rebuild
> something from ocaml\* or
> facile\*)
I use mp
Subbsd wrote:
> I found two broken rebuild after upgrade xcb:
>
> 1) vlc doesn't build (
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164268 )
> 2) kalzium doesn't build ( It is corrected after force rebuild
> something from ocaml\* or
> facile\*)
3) xfce4-wm
libtool: link: cannot find
I found two broken rebuild after upgrade xcb:
1) vlc doesn't build (
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164268 )
2) kalzium doesn't build ( It is corrected after force rebuild
something from ocaml\* or
facile\*)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.or
Nikola Lečić wrote:
> Anyway, it wasn't clear from the bsd.licenses.mk that we should use
> 'multi' in situations of 'any later version'. This means that all
> licensing info of eg. GPL2+ ports must be updated when GPL4 appears...
No, we should not use this. Not just because of the potential of ha
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 14:35, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > Anything can go wrong, but it is (IMO) quite easy to state the intention
> of
> > the FreeBSD Project in this case.
>
> You're making the very common mistake of assuming that the law has
25 matches
Mail list logo