Re: Can't get gvim working

2012-08-05 Thread David Demelier
On 05/08/2012 00:12, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/04/2012 14:56, David Demelier wrote: I finally found the problem: at the configure target see, checking for GTK - version = 2.2.0... Package glproto was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing

Re: Can't get gvim working

2012-08-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/05/2012 00:18, David Demelier wrote: On 05/08/2012 00:12, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/04/2012 14:56, David Demelier wrote: I finally found the problem: at the configure target see, checking for GTK - version = 2.2.0... Package glproto was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps

Re: Can't get gvim working

2012-08-05 Thread David Demelier
On 05/08/2012 11:01, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/05/2012 00:18, David Demelier wrote: On 05/08/2012 00:12, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/04/2012 14:56, David Demelier wrote: I finally found the problem: at the configure target see, checking for GTK - version = 2.2.0... Package glproto was not found

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread RW
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700 Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 August 2012 15:21, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 09:42:39 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: Having a default ccache directory in the makefile that's different from the default documented in the ccache man

Request: py-mnemosyne 2

2012-08-05 Thread Marek Rudnicki
Hi everyone mnemosyne 2.0.1 is out for a while. I was wandering, if there is any hope to have it updated in ports. Thank you Marek ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send

Segfault in rtld - dlopen RTLD_LAZY (was: Re: CFT: vlc 2.0.3 - want to know where it works and where only partly)

2012-08-05 Thread Juergen Lock
Hi kib, -current, seems we have a segfault in rtld when updating the multimedia/vlc port from the version currently in ports to the 2.0.3 CFT version from here: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.3-006.patch (If you test the LIVEMEDIA knob you also need this update:

Re: php53-pdo_mysql fail with MYSQLND

2012-08-05 Thread Michael Ranner
Hello, you are right. pkg_deinstall php53-pdo_mysql and make install works without problems. Regards, Michael Am 05.08.12 02:32, schrieb Panagiotis Christias: On 3/8/2012 23:44, Michael Ranner wrote: Hello! I have trouble with upgrading php53-pdo_mysql (5.3.14 to 5.3.15) on several

Re: Segfault in rtld - dlopen RTLD_LAZY (was: Re: CFT: vlc 2.0.3 - want to know where it works and where only partly)

2012-08-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 05:31:19PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi kib, -current, seems we have a segfault in rtld when updating the multimedia/vlc port from the version currently in ports to the 2.0.3 CFT version from here: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.3-006.patch (If

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread Eitan Adler
On 5 August 2012 04:15, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700 Eitan Adler wrote: Why isn't it? In that scenario /var/cache wouldn't be writable. IMHO the directories used by the ports system should be predictable and static. Which user you happen to be

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 5 August 2012 04:15, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700 Eitan Adler wrote: Why isn't it? In that scenario /var/cache wouldn't be writable. IMHO the directories used by the ports

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 5 August 2012 04:15, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700 Eitan Adler wrote: Why isn't it? In that scenario

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

2012-08-05 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, the wise Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Sorry about the problem. Could you please mention the error messages (if any you're getting) ? It seems that emacs 24.1 core dumps only with dbus enabled: ... Fatal error (11)Segmentation fault (core dumped) ... With dbus disabled (and

Re: Jenkins+FreeBSD handbooks

2012-08-05 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Marin Atanasov Nikolov dna...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich de...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello Bernhard, Thanks a lot for that tutorials. They look very interesting and I was always curious how much work it would have been to

Re: Segfault in rtld - dlopen RTLD_LAZY (was: Re: CFT: vlc 2.0.3 - want to know where it works and where only partly)

2012-08-05 Thread Juergen Lock
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 07:13:53PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 05:31:19PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi kib, -current, seems we have a segfault in rtld when updating the multimedia/vlc port from the version currently in ports to the 2.0.3 CFT version from here:

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

2012-08-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:28:42 +0200 (CEST), Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl said: On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, the wise Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Sorry about the problem. Could you please mention the error messages (if any you're getting) ? It seems that emacs 24.1 core dumps only with dbus enabled: ...

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

2012-08-05 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, the wise Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Does emacs -Q crash for you as well? Yes, same error messages. Regards, Marco -- Don't relax! It's only your tension that's holding you together. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

2012-08-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:06:29 +0530, ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) said: On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 19:19:02 +0200 (CEST), Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl said: On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, the wise Ashish SHUKLA wrote: I use following, and it seems to work fine for me: --8---cut

Re: Can't get gvim working

2012-08-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/05/2012 03:05, David Demelier wrote: On 05/08/2012 11:01, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/05/2012 00:18, David Demelier wrote: On 05/08/2012 00:12, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/04/2012 14:56, David Demelier wrote: I finally found the problem: at the configure target see, checking for GTK -

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread Jan Beich
Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org writes: The cache directory CCACHE_DIR defaults to /usr/obj/ccache Why not ${.OBJDIR}/ccache? This avoids one big port taking away all allocated space for itself unless --max-size is raised. Also, I have /usr/obj - /nonexistent symlink. Anything that doesn't

CDE released as open source

2012-08-05 Thread Pedro Giffuni
As spotted in OSNews.com, CDE has been released under LGPL on sourceforge: http://www.cdesktopenv.org/  The linux port is still considered alpha quality. CDE brings me some (not too good) memories as it managed to make some supposedly big servers look really slow but it will certainly be a

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/05/2012 19:47, Jan Beich wrote: Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org writes: The cache directory CCACHE_DIR defaults to /usr/obj/ccache Why not ${.OBJDIR}/ccache? This avoids one big port taking away all allocated space for itself unless --max-size is raised. Also, I have /usr/obj -

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/4/2012 7:38 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: On 4 August 2012 15:21, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 09:42:39 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: Having a default ccache directory in the makefile that's different from the default documented in the ccache man page seems needlessly

Re: lang/gcc46

2012-08-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/31/2012 08:57, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Doug Barton wrote: lang/gcc and lang/gcc46 should be fully compatible, without rebuilds necessary. Only when lang/gcc is going to move to GCC 4.7 later this year would I consider that. IMO this highlights the issue that