Problems with fetching from GitHub using GH_TAGNAME= hash

2016-09-17 Thread Kevin Oberman 
I an attempting to write a port for multimedia/mp4vs which has moved from
Google Code to GitHub. I tried specifying GH_TAGNAME= 6fda22f, but instead
of fetching mp4v2-Release-MP4v2-3.0.1.1.tar.gz, it tries to fetch
mp4v2-Release-MP4v2-3.0.1.1_GH0.tar.gz. (Note added "_GH0".)

I have no idea where this is coming from an have no experience with porting
where GitHub is the distfile repo.

My Makefile contains:
USE_GITHUB= yes
GH_ACCOUNT= TechSmith
GH_PROJECT= mp4v2
GH_TAGNAME= 6fda22f

Any idea what I need to change?

Thanks,
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: mp4v2-1.9.1_1

2016-09-17 Thread Kevin Oberman 
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Kevin Oberman  wrote:

> Oops.Forgot the URL. https://github.com/TechSmith/mp4v2/releases
>
> Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
> E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Kevin Oberman 
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Michael  wrote:
>>
>>> Port is marked as broken :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> please fix this see
>>> https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^mp4v2-1.9.1_1
>>> >> >
>>> =name
>>>
>>
>> The port was housed on Google Code which is longer exists. There is a
>> version on gifhub that is at 3.0.1.1 while the current FreeBSD version is
>> 1.9.1. It may take a bit of work to update the port to that version. If I
>> get some time, I will give it a try, but I have not written or updated a
>> port in a long time, so, if someone else wants to give it a shot (maybe
>> you), go for it.
>>
>>
> I have a port that builds correctly, but I have not figured out how to get
the distribution file to fetch correctly from GitHub. The developer calls
the current version 3.0.1.1, but it is just a tag an not a release. The
latest github release is 2.0.1 with several tags that are named "Release"
on GitHub, so it takes ugly, ugly hacks to make it fetch. (Or, more likely,
I just don't understand manipulating things on github as it didn't exist
last time I wrote a port about a decade ago.)

I'll continue working on it, but I 'm pretty confident that I can get it to
work and pass muster of a committer.

N.B. If you have the old distfile, it is still fine. Just edit Makefile to
remove the BROKEN line and it will build. If you don't have the distfile,
you will need to get it from someone else who still has it. (I can make it
available, if anyone needs it.)
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

FreeBSD Port: neovim-0.1.4_2

2016-09-17 Thread Christopher Deluca 
Hello,

Thanks for maintaining the FreeBSD Neovim port!

Just wondering if/when it will be upgraded to 0.1.5?

Thanks!


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: Firefox with no sound

2016-09-17 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón 
2016-09-17 14:36 GMT+02:00 Elton Luis Grandolpho :

> Hi,
>
> I am using Firefox and Chromium in my computer.
>
> Sound works fine using Chromium(last version), but does not work with
> Firefox(last version) using youtube , for example.
>
> uname -a
> FreeBSD FX6100ASUS 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #0 r297264: Fri Mar
> 25 02:10:02 UTC 2016 
> r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> amd64
>
> $ ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile
> /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile:
>  $FreeBSD: tags/RELEASE_10_3_0/www/firefox/Makefile 410638 2016-03-08
> 18:19:56Z jbeich $
>
> Could you check, please?
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know
>
> Best regards
>
> Elton Luis Grandolpho
>
>
>
Hi Elton Luis,

If you have compiled firefox with Pulseaudio support you may want to check
PA's settings. From the command line, you can reroute audio with something
like "pactl move-sink-input 3 oss_output.dsp0".  You can inspect clients
using PA with "pactl list". I'm pretty sure there are some graphical
options like gnome-audio-settings or something like that, but I haven't got
them installed.

Otherwise there is a sysctl variable, hw.snd.default_unit, which you may
also want to check. Set it to your desired output before launching firefox
(if you don't have PA support compiled in).

Hope that helps,
Fernando
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [maintainer change] net-mgmt/cnagios

2016-09-17 Thread Danny Warren 

On 9/17/2016 11:02 AM, olli hauer wrote:

On 2016-09-17 19:40, Alexander wrote:

Hi, I want to transfer net-mgmt/cnagios maintainership to dannywarren 
(da...@dannywarren.com). He has already gave an approve, see comments here at 
212102 (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212102)


done;

Thanks for maintaining cnagios during the last years!


Thanks Alexander and Olli!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [maintainer change] net-mgmt/cnagios

2016-09-17 Thread olli hauer 
On 2016-09-17 19:40, Alexander wrote:
> Hi, I want to transfer net-mgmt/cnagios maintainership to dannywarren 
> (da...@dannywarren.com). He has already gave an approve, see comments here at 
> 212102 (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212102) 
> 


done;

Thanks for maintaining cnagios during the last years!

-- 
olli
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[maintainer change] net-mgmt/cnagios

2016-09-17 Thread Alexander 
Hi, I want to transfer net-mgmt/cnagios maintainership to dannywarren 
(da...@dannywarren.com). He has already gave an approve, see comments here at 
212102 (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212102) 

P.S. Sorry for my English.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Checking port option descriptions

2016-09-17 Thread Warren Block 

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Margaret wrote:


[Default] On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:47:10 +0100, Mike Clarke
 wrote:


For cases where one line comments won't suffice how about providing the facility
to include an extra text file in a port (perhaps "pkg-options") containing
notes about why some particular options would be chosen?

In its simplest form a user would be able to refer to the file before selecting
an option, A further enhancement could be to modify the way that configure
works so that the user can select an option and press "?" to see the section
of text, if any, from pkg-options explaining that option.


I like that idea!

The nice thing about good, useful comments is that, like the
software itself, they generally only have to be written from
scratch ONCE.

It shouldn't be too hard to agree a template for the file you
propose.


This already exists, without adding anything at all.  There is help text 
at the bottom of the screen to show these.  Unfortunately, I can't think 
of an example.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Checking port option descriptions

2016-09-17 Thread Margaret 
[Default] On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:47:10 +0100, Mike Clarke
 wrote:

>For cases where one line comments won't suffice how about providing the 
>facility 
>to include an extra text file in a port (perhaps "pkg-options") containing 
>notes about why some particular options would be chosen?
>
>In its simplest form a user would be able to refer to the file before 
>selecting 
>an option, A further enhancement could be to modify the way that configure 
>works so that the user can select an option and press "?" to see the section 
>of text, if any, from pkg-options explaining that option.

I like that idea!

The nice thing about good, useful comments is that, like the
software itself, they generally only have to be written from
scratch ONCE.

It shouldn't be too hard to agree a template for the file you
propose.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Firefox with no sound

2016-09-17 Thread David Wolfskill 
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:36:20PM +, Elton Luis Grandolpho wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am using Firefox and Chromium in my computer.
> 
> Sound works fine using Chromium(last version), but does not work with 
> Firefox(last version) using youtube , for example.
> 
> uname -a
> FreeBSD FX6100ASUS 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #0 r297264: Fri Mar 25 
> 02:10:02 UTC 2016 
> r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
> 
> $ ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile
> /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile:
>  $FreeBSD: tags/RELEASE_10_3_0/www/firefox/Makefile 410638 2016-03-08 
> 18:19:56Z jbeich $
> 
> Could you check, please?
> 
> If you have any questions, please let me know

I don't run chromium on my laptop, but I do keep both FreeBSD and
firefox up-to-date, and I've had no problems with sound playing using
firefox (e.g., http://www.npr.org/programs/wait-wait-dont-tell-me/):

g1-252(10.3-S)[1] uname -a
FreeBSD g1-252.catwhisker.org 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #475  
r305853M/305866:1003508: Fri Sep 16 04:59:56 PDT 2016 
r...@g1-252.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY  amd64
g1-252(10.3-S)[2] ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile
/usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile:
 $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 422207 2016-09-15 15:28:27Z jbeich $
g1-252(10.3-S)[3] pkg info firefox-\*
firefox-49.0_2,1
g1-252(10.3-S)[4] 

(Note: as of r305896, r305853 was (still) the most recent commit
to  stable/10; that's why I didn't bother rebuilding stable/10 this
morning.)

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill  da...@catwhisker.org
Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Firefox with no sound

2016-09-17 Thread Elton Luis Grandolpho 
Hi,

I am using Firefox and Chromium in my computer.

Sound works fine using Chromium(last version), but does not work with 
Firefox(last version) using youtube , for example.

uname -a
FreeBSD FX6100ASUS 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #0 r297264: Fri Mar 25 
02:10:02 UTC 2016 r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC 
 amd64

$ ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile
/usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile:
 $FreeBSD: tags/RELEASE_10_3_0/www/firefox/Makefile 410638 2016-03-08 
18:19:56Z jbeich $

Could you check, please?

If you have any questions, please let me know

Best regards

Elton Luis Grandolpho


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: llvm37 build fail, FreeBSD 10.3

2016-09-17 Thread Dave 
On Monday 12 September 2016 16:42:38 Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:30:59PM +0100, Dave wrote:
> > building llvm37 from ports (via portupgrade), fails on at least 10.3
> > 
> > Requires re2c and ninja but neither are pulled in, build fails unless 
> > manually installed first.
> 
> Something is seriously out of wack with portupgrade or perhaps your
> ports tree.  I don't portupgrade any more so can't really do much to
> diagnose this problem without a log (and I'm not really sure what I'd do
> with one).
> 
> llvm37/Makefile includes USES=ninja which causes ninja to be a build
> depend.  Off hand, the only way I could see that not happening is of
> something was wrong with Mk/Uses/ninja.mk.
> 
Thanks for the reply.

I use portsnap/portupgrade because it covers those ports which either don't 
have packages for whatever reason or where I compile with non-standard options 
(getting fewer and fewer fortunately.)  I usually do a pkg upgrade first and 
that often takes care of most updates.

As for LLVM, everything else seems to have updated ok, which is why I mentioned 
it, just in case there was an actual problem with the port.  I rarely see 
compile issues these days and it's entirely possible it's at my end.  Obviously 
I "fixed" it by manually installing the required ports, so I can't really 
duplicate it now.  Still, if no one else has sen the issue then it likely is an 
issue at my end rather than the port itself.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Checking port option descriptions

2016-09-17 Thread olli hauer 
On 2016-09-17 10:47, Mike Clarke wrote:
> On Friday 16 Sep 2016 20:09:06 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> 
>> Even when the meaning is clear in  global sense, what are the implications
>> for an application. E.g. "RTC=on: Add support for kernel real time clock"
>> in mplayer. I know exactly what the RTC is, but I have no idea why I might
>> or might not want it in mplayer.
> 
> For cases where one line comments won't suffice how about providing the 
> facility 
> to include an extra text file in a port (perhaps "pkg-options") containing 
> notes about why some particular options would be chosen?
> 
> In its simplest form a user would be able to refer to the file before 
> selecting 
> an option, A further enhancement could be to modify the way that configure 
> works so that the user can select an option and press "?" to see the section 
> of text, if any, from pkg-options explaining that option.
> 

This is already possible with the pkg-help file, but until now only 17 ports 
using this to provide additional information

I agree with the request from Warren, but looking over optcheck-output.txt we 
will find many false positives.

Sometimes the port defines a descriptive OPTION where it is hard to find a 
better description, also many ports using Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk, so the same 
description should match for example to a server or a client port (e.g. 
KERBEROS)

I suspect the list will contain less the 100 issues if reviewed in context of 
the port and the port category

Some samples from the list for "** just adding "enable support" is not a 
description"

audio/decibel-audio-player/Makefile
  AUDIOCD = AudioCD support

deskutils/py-bugwarrior/Makefile
  BUGZILLA = Enable Bugzilla support
  PHABRICATOR = Enable Phabricator support

dns/gdnsd/Makefile
  GEOIP = Enable GeoIP Support

games/imaze/Makefile
  JOYSTICK = Joystick support

graphics/devil/Makefile
  JPEG = Enable JPEG support  (one example for most every graphic format)
...



-- 
olli
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Checking port option descriptions

2016-09-17 Thread Mike Clarke 
On Friday 16 Sep 2016 20:09:06 Kevin Oberman wrote:

> Even when the meaning is clear in  global sense, what are the implications
> for an application. E.g. "RTC=on: Add support for kernel real time clock"
> in mplayer. I know exactly what the RTC is, but I have no idea why I might
> or might not want it in mplayer.

For cases where one line comments won't suffice how about providing the 
facility 
to include an extra text file in a port (perhaps "pkg-options") containing 
notes about why some particular options would be chosen?

In its simplest form a user would be able to refer to the file before selecting 
an option, A further enhancement could be to modify the way that configure 
works so that the user can select an option and press "?" to see the section 
of text, if any, from pkg-options explaining that option.

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"