I have the same experience with firefox and I too have used seamonkey
for years and have never found a suitable replacement. Right now, I'm
using Falkon which seems to be ok minus a few quirks here and there
but still more tolerable than firefox.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 9:20 PM Robert Huff
On 11 Aug 2019, at 20:29, bruce wrote:
> I have tried firefox. It crashes regularly
That doesn’t sound right. If Firefox is crashing a lot there is something not
quite right with your system or install.
Seamonkey was last update a bit over a year ago.
That’s about a decade in Browser time.
bruce writes:
> I used seamonkey for years without problems. Now with seamonkey no
> longer available I have tried firefox. It crashes regularly and
> isn't nearly as good as seamonkey. When are you bringing seamonkey
> back?
Short answer: probably never.
Longer answer:
I used seamonkey for years without problems. Now with seamonkey no
longer available I have tried firefox. It crashes regularly and isn't
nearly as good as seamonkey. When are you bringing seamonkey back?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 5:50 PM Martin Waschbüsch wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> > Am 11.08.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Adam Weinberger :
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:05 PM Franco Fichtner
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Quarterly is essentially useless if the decision is to immediately axe a
> >> deprecated
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 4:23 PM Martin Waschbüsch
wrote:
>
> > Am 11.08.2019 um 23:31 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker <
> wolfg...@lyxys.ka.sub.org>:
> >
> > * Martin Waschbüsch [190811 20:41]:
> >> [..]
> >>> You could also have used the quarterly branch, which keeps software
> till
> >>> the end of
Hi Adam,
> Am 11.08.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Adam Weinberger :
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:05 PM Franco Fichtner wrote:
>>
>> Quarterly is essentially useless if the decision is to immediately axe a
>> deprecated release. 3 months are nothing in production environments, if you
>> get 3 months
> Am 11.08.2019 um 23:31 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker :
>
> * Martin Waschbüsch [190811 20:41]:
>> [..]
>>> You could also have used the quarterly branch, which keeps software till
>>> the end of the quarter. In the case of php 5.6 it would have given you
>>> time until March 31st, and would have
* Martin Waschbüsch [190811 20:41]:
> [..]
>> You could also have used the quarterly branch, which keeps software till
>> the end of the quarter. In the case of php 5.6 it would have given you
>> time until March 31st, and would have included version 5.6.40
> 5.6.40 never made it into the main
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:05 PM Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
> Quarterly is essentially useless if the decision is to immediately axe a
> deprecated release. 3 months are nothing in production environments, if you
> get 3 months (1,5 months mean) at all and also all other updates and security
>
Quarterly is essentially useless if the decision is to immediately axe a
deprecated release. 3 months are nothing in production environments, if you get
3 months (1,5 months mean) at all and also all other updates and security
relevant bug fixes in the same quarterly that you desperately need.
Hi Wolfgang,
> Am 11.08.2019 um 01:12 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker :
>
> * Martin Waschbüsch [190811 00:47]:
>>> Am 10.08.2019 um 20:18 schrieb Patrick Powell :
>>>
>>> Umm this was just the kick in the pants that I needed to switch to PHP 7.
>>> See https://www.glaver.org/blog/?p=1109 for a
12 matches
Mail list logo
