On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:55:00 -0400, Robert Huff stated:
>Andrea Venturoli writes:
>
>> Sorry for being pedantic, but I believe a lot of us would benefit
>> from some guidance:
>> _ should we upgrade promptly to 4.10? Will it work or will it be a
>> waste of time?
>> _ should we stay on 4.8,
Le 17/09/2019 à 08:40, Mathieu Arnold a écrit :
What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
a big impact on build time and ressources required for building.
If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am
glad to tell you that no, it will not
Andrea Venturoli writes:
> Sorry for being pedantic, but I believe a lot of us would benefit from
> some guidance:
> _ should we upgrade promptly to 4.10? Will it work or will it be a waste
> of time?
> _ should we stay on 4.8, because it will be the default on FreeBSD for a
> long
On 2019-09-12 13:13, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I'd like some information WRT to the status of samba ports, what is
[not] working, what *should* be working and what is planned.
...
Is it supposed to be production ready?
What does and what does not work?
Is there some page (wiki or
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:29:06PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2
> underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the extent
> that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly
>
Bottom line: flavors came into being to satisfy specific needs. Python 2
underwent substantial changes during the upgrade to python 3, to the extent
that many (most) python applications would cease to function. Similarly
php5 to php7. Without flavours the user-base would've been severly
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:16:50AM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:39 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > The issue is that FLAVORS
