On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:03:20 +0200 Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de said
Am 28.04.20 um 22:02 schrieb Chris:
> In sentiment I am inline with your thoughts as well.
> Would it be a worthy project to create a mailman(2)-lts port?
> I'd be fully up for helping, and or creating it myself.
>
Hi!
> On 28 Apr 2020, at 14:00, Chris wrote:
> > as at *least* it completely abandons the previous archive system.
>
> Pipermail was??? lacking. It looked 20 years old (because it was).
>
> > Making your previous archive, an archive of an archive.
>
> AIUI you can move your entire archive to
On 28 Apr 2020, at 14:00, Chris wrote:
> as at *least* it completely abandons the previous archive system.
Pipermail was… lacking. It looked 20 years old (because it was).
> Making your previous archive, an archive of an archive.
AIUI you can move your entire archive to the new system. You can
Am 28.04.20 um 22:02 schrieb Chris:
> In sentiment I am inline with your thoughts as well.
> Would it be a worthy project to create a mailman(2)-lts port?
> I'd be fully up for helping, and or creating it myself.
> There's a port that's a shim for py2.x-->py3.x called 2to3, or something
> like
On 2020-Apr-29, at 10:22, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:50:36 +0200
> Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:36:01 -0700
>> Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> [Build successes for building via poudriere-devel.
>>> Message history removed.]
>>>
>>> Based on (some
Hi, new maintenance release is out,
this port could use an upstream release.
Can you please upgrade the port?
Ty , regards,
dutchy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Hi all,
the nextcloud port seems to be at version 18.0.4 since April, 23rd:
https://www.freshports.org/www/nextcloud/
Yet the package repo has all three flavors at 18.0.3:
http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/latest/All/
nextcloud-php72-18.0.3.txz687546482020-Apr-24 07:11
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:17:55 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com):
>
> > 1) Why is the "update" procedure deliberately removed from the
> > port?
>
> The svn history does mention it:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=527607
> "Remove
Would people be open to the idea of a sysutils/screen-ncurses port that
depends on devel/ncurses instead of ncureses in base? The reason for this
is there are screen.* terminfo entries in devel/ncurses that don't exist in
termcap(5). People who want that extra functionality would be advised to
## Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com):
> 1) Why is the "update" procedure deliberately removed from the port?
The svn history does mention it:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=527607
"Remove drivedb update binary as it will modify tracked files"
A port has no business modifying
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:00:35 -0400, Dan McGrath stated:
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:20 AM Bob Eager wrote:
>
>> The port doesn't get updated every time there is a new drive
>> database; that would be unworkable.
>>
>
>Just a thought, but perhaps something similar to what ntp does with:
>
Hi, Reference:
> From: Greg Veldman
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:33:42 -0400
Greg Veldman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Even if it's possible to bend ports/mail/mailman to support Mailman3
> > Please do not do it; keep it clean for
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Even if it's possible to bend ports/mail/mailman to support Mailman3
> Please do not do it; keep it clean for just Mailman2
> (Else it would cause big run time problems for user admins (inc. me)).
>
> Any who will want Mailman3
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:20 AM Bob Eager wrote:
> The port doesn't get updated every time there is a new drive database;
> that would be unworkable.
>
Just a thought, but perhaps something similar to what ntp does with:
service ntpd fetch
But of course using smartd, so that it can
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:43:40 -0400
Carmel NY wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:52:04 +0100, Bob Eager stated:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA256
> >
> >On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400
> >Carmel NY wrote:
> >
> >> FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8
> >>
> >> Output of smartctl -V
>
Greg Veldman wrote ports@:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:02:14PM -0700, Chris wrote:
> > It also wouldn't be that difficult to simply modify mailman(2)
> > to adopt the py3.x language changes.
>
> To simply make it work, perhaps not. To make it work well and
> be reliable... might be more
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:52:04 +0100, Bob Eager stated:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400
>Carmel NY wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8
>>
>> Output of smartctl -V
>>
>> smartctl 7.1 2019-12-30 r5022 [FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p7 amd64] (local
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400
Carmel NY wrote:
> FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8
>
> Output of smartctl -V
>
> smartctl 7.1 2019-12-30 r5022 [FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p7 amd64] (local
> build) Copyright (C) 2002-19, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke,
>
FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8
Output of smartctl -V
smartctl 7.1 2019-12-30 r5022 [FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p7 amd64] (local
build) Copyright (C) 2002-19, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke,
www.smartmontools.org
smartctl comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free
software, and you are welcome to
[Build successes for building via poudriere-devel.
Message history removed.]
Based on (some whitespace details might not survive):
# svnlite diff /usr/ports/devel/aarch64-none-elf-gcc/
Index: /usr/ports/devel/aarch64-none-elf-gcc/Makefile
20 matches
Mail list logo
