On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:36:16 +0200
Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host
mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [82.103.104.21]
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
Hello!
I'm reporting that the fxtv port is working perfectly on amd64
platform, so please add it into the multimedia/fxtv/Makefile.
Tested in FreeBSD-5.4.
It has been enabled on amd64 for 1 1/2 years ;)
Thanks anyway!
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
X11BASE compliance.
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index
Dear Porters,
Now that X11BASE errors are more or less under control (we're mostly
waiting on a few lagging maintainers to do their part), I've started
another gcc 4.1 test build so that maintainers can start to work on
that in preparation for the gcc 4.x import into 7.0.
Based on the previous
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:09:52AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:29:26PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Are you maintainers really going to let your ports be the ones that
hold us up?! You know who
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
I'm trying to maintain the gnat-gcc* Ada compiler ports,
currently there are gnat-gcc34 and 41. I'd like to
introduce newer versions, and retire experimental 34,
which is built from an ancient binary which requires
FreeBSD 4
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 12:14:43AM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
1. what do I have to do that gnat-gcc packages will
appear on FreeBSD FTP sites?
Get a buildable package committed to the FreeBSD ports tree
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:19:27PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
I've been having a really weird video problem on my two machines when running
4.11. My 4.11 machines run XFree86 4.5.0
I have a dual-head setup I've been using for a few years. Recently, the left
monitor looks like it has
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:32:47PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 19:27, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:19:27PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
I've been having a really weird video problem on my two machines when
running 4.11. My 4.11 machines
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:36:44AM +0200, gareth wrote:
On Sun 2006-12-03 (21:30), Kris Kennaway wrote:
Update your ports tree? The index is probably newer than the actual
ports.
sorry i should've mentioned that, i always run this beforehand:
cvsup -L 2 /etc/cvsup.conf
portsdb -Fu
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:26:53AM +0200, gareth wrote:
On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote:
Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)...
sure, the original question then since we've moved lists:
On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote:
hi, portupgrade
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:08:26AM +0200, gareth wrote:
On Mon 2006-12-04 (05:42), gareth wrote:
strange, thanx, am trying another mirror ..
yup, our country's mirror wasn't up to date.
OK, good to know. Can you report further details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kris
pgpNpryK6Vaf2.pgp
Thanks to the hard work of a number of maintainers and committers
we're making good progress on bringing the ports tree into complete
X11BASE compliance.
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index-maintainer.html
We're now down to fewer than 110 ports that need to be
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:22:43AM +0100, Vincent Blondel wrote:
Something is wrong with your mail client, your reply was intermingled
with my email without quoting it in a recognizable way. I've repaired
this for now but please fix this in future.
Also, somehow you managed to ignore the
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:15:10PM +0100, Vincent Blondel wrote:
Hello,
I just finalized a Makefile making a complete apache jail machine. For
this I used a common
'make DESTDIR=jail_path install clean'
But I noticed this does not work with all ports. For info, these packages
give
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:44:25PM +, Florent Thoumie wrote:
Joel Dahl wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:24 +, Florent Thoumie wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Currently we have 2 locations for files installed by ports. LOCALBASE
(which defaults to /usr/local) and X11BASE (which defaults
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:02:53PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Let's suppose I have a list of tarballs
(e.g. foobar-1.23.456.tar.gz). How do I tell which port each file
belongs to? pkg_info only lists the end results.
This information is not compiled in any convenient form. You would
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:29:30PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote:
On Nov 27, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
FYI; can you please investigate and/or report to the developers? If
you are already aware of this problem but do not yet have a fix,
please mark the port BROKEN in the appropriate
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 07:26:01PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Looking at
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got two new reports along the lines of
=== Checking filesystem state
list of extra files and directories in / (not present before this port was
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 10:25:37PM -0800, MC wrote:
I haven't been able to get qemu to work at all with the kqemu kernel
module.
OK :) If you want help you'll need to provide some details.
On the bright side, qemu compiles nicely with O6, though I had to kill
a comma in my CFLAGS to get sed
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:53:55AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 11/23/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
I have started a new package build with X11BASE=/usr/xorg, to shake
out those ports that need to be brought into PREFIX-compliance to deal
with the move of xorg
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:57:08PM +0100, Anders Troback wrote:
Hi,
I have some problems with qemu-0.8.2s.20061102!
When I start Qemu the Qemu console appears and crash:
Bad system call (core dumped)
I have tried on both 6.1 and 6.2!
Anyone running Qemu on 6.2 or 6.1?
You need to
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:48:38AM -0800, Eric P. Scott wrote:
This is not enough; since it is a 4.x binary it is linked against 4.x
versions of those libraries, and if you try and run the binary on a
modern version of FreeBSD then it will fail, since those libraries are
incompatible with
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:19:51PM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
It should work, but people sometimes report that it doesn't
(i.e. when they get the resulting panic). It at least needs to be
investigated.
What I suggested works for qemu since kldstat -m works for
aio and kqemu. May be
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:44:14AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:41:37AM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
Hi!
I've received a bunch of build failures on pointyhat with the same
error reason:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link cc -O -pipe -pthread -o mtest mtest.o
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 07:46:41PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 13:52 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
Given the usual (and largely unavoidable) difficulties of auto*
updates we'll of course want to test it on pointyhat first.
Actually, this one isn't so bad, since it's simply
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:41:37AM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
Hi!
I've received a bunch of build failures on pointyhat with the same
error reason:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link cc -O -pipe -pthread -o mtest mtest.o
+libmysqlclient.la -L/usr/local/lib -lodbc -lz
libtool: link: cannot
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:59:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Hello,
I am updating audio/beast to version 0.7.0.
At first it didn't seem to work, it was segfaulting like crazy when run.
With the friendly help of upstream developers I was able
to track this down to a shared library
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:37:31PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.11.11 21:12:09 +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
I don't like the current behaviour of the net/isc-dhcp3-server port
of creating 'dhcpd' user and group using dynamic allocation instead of
having static one (as
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:05:05PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.11.11 15:48:05 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:37:31PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2006.11.11 21:12:09 +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
I don't like the current behaviour
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:53:13AM +0200, Vlad GURDIGA wrote:
Hello,
I get this when I try to install libevent:
# make install clean
=== Extracting for libevent-1.2_1
= MD5 Checksum mismatch for libevent-1.2.tar.gz.
= SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libevent-1.2.tar.gz.
You already have a
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:02:07PM -0200, Giancarlo Rubio wrote:
Hello:
How works the procces for pre-compiled packages in tree
directory /All and the /Latest on freebsd ftp?
Wich time a package was updated on /Latest? And time move to /All??
Latest/ is just a symlink to the version in
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm working on a new port. One of the dependencies is net/wireshark. I
noticed that net/wireshark can be build without x11 support. If you build
it normally, it uses WANT_GNOME=YES, USE_GNOME=gnometarget. This leads to
a
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:32:39PM +, Dan Angelescu wrote:
Hi !
My name is Angelescu Ovidiu and i am the developer of RoFreeSBIE ( a Live
CD/DVD ) FreeBSD based.
Reading the ports mailinglist i have found that ports were freezed until 24
october but from ftp.freebsd.org i have
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 01:00:03AM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 06:13:36PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
Ok, heads up folks.
Ports have been frozen for some weeks now, and it's only a matter of
time before ice starts melting. So we're planning to hold the next
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
Hi,
according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
dropped in favour for LOCALBASE.
Is there an actual schedule until when this should happen and how should
we deal with our current ports now? Just
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:55:16PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
Hi,
according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
dropped in favour for LOCALBASE
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:19:05PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote:
On 10/19/06 15:14, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:55:16PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:32PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
thought about:
A)
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 09:00:27PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
For future reference, take a look at how I handle this in the BIND
ports. If you'd named the _port_ 0.3.a1_2, then when 0.3 comes out,
pkg_version is smart enough to know that it's 0.3.a*.
hth,
Doug
PS, PORTEPOCH is evil,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:20:12PM -0700, Alexander Botero-Lowry wrote:
Hi,
Python 2.5 seems to install automatically generated egg-info files for
each package. This causes each port, which installs files into
the site-packages directory to leave files around:
For devel/pygame
Hi all,
Some of you might be feeling bored during the freeze, so please
consider checking out:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-latest/
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-6-latest/
and working on some of the ~200 port failures listed there. Some of
them have been
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 04:29:09PM -0400, Grant Horning wrote:
I need to install Ethereal but it is no longer located in ports. A
search of the online ports collection also had no results.
What happened to Ethereal? I'm using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6.
See /usr/ports/MOVED or consult
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:41:04AM +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:53:21 GMT
Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..Unknown modifier 'u'
Bareword found where operator expected at -e line 1, near
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 02:16:04AM +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:44:13 -0400
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
It seems that index for 7.0 is building on STABLE? As ':u' modifier
exists in -CURRENT...
Ok, I've commented it out, now should build OK
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:53:45PM +0200, Jacques S. wrote:
The problem I have now is that I cannot get the latest Ruby18 port will
not install in one of the FreeBSD systems I look after. After an
otherwise apparently normal make and make install, process ruby18 stalls
at Generating RI in
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
Kris Kennaway said:
FYI, I'm not sure if the python version is parallelizable, but you do
get a small benefit from using parallelized 'make index' builds (via
INDEX_JOBS) on a typical SMP machine.
My script runs parallel
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:16:18PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
If any of you are in the habit of monitoring pointyhat or derivative
sites (portsmon, etc) for port failures, note that the current
i386/7.0 build is using a snapshot of gcc 4.1 as part of plans to
update the compiler in HEAD
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Ven 29 sep 06 ? 19:21:22 +0200, Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?crivait?:
Hello,
Hi,
i have written yet another index builder in python, which can be found here:
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/build_index.py
I
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:04:19AM +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 01:28:21AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:23:53AM +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:37:30AM +, Erwin Lansing wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:17:16AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Friday, 22. September 2006 19:33, Scot Hetzel wrote:
Is there something wrong on my system, or is there
a bug in this configure script.
It looks like portmgr in their infinite wisdom changed the TR definition to
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:31:07AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Saturday 23 September 2006 17:25, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:21:15PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Is there an easy way to find when the ports tree was checked out for a
given package run?
I have
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:21:15PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Is there an easy way to find when the ports tree was checked out for a given
package run?
It would be nice to be able to sync my tree to that date and be able to use
portupgrade -P and get a good hit rate.
Thanks for
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:56:43AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:51 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Is there an easy way to find when the ports tree was checked out
for a given package run?
Doing a ls -ltr on the appropriate package directory on one of the
FTP servers is
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:10:55PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
avifile has not built on current since the update of gcc to the latest
3.4.6 fixes back on Aug. 25.
When I try building avifile on either of my current systems, I get the
error:
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:06:53PM -0400, andres chavez wrote:
Hi im having problems to complete a normal installation on my FreeBSD
box this is my uname -a
i.e. installing xmms
PORTNAME= xmms
PORTVERSION=1.2.10
PORTREVISION= 6
this is what i get.
=== Installing for
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:23:55PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
This is the first time I've tried to modify a port,
and I'm having a bit of trouble because this port
requires MySQL 3.23 and PHP 4. Those dependencies
weren't specified in the port before.
I've gotten PHP4 by adding:
USE_PHP=
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:42:37PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
Would you recommend doing the partial job of updating
the port for the vulnerability and requiring PHP4
while I work on the ultimate solution?
It will result in a broken port unless you can address the mysql
thing - there's no way
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
It's current state is that it will install a
vulnerable version with either the installed php and
mysql client or php5 and mysql5. In the latter case,
there are many bugs in the installed port.
If I submit what I have now, it will
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will fail to package is pretty far from perfection
in my book :)
I don't believe I ever said that. It builds fine and
even runs, it just has lots of bugs.
Can you let me know
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:00:14PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred Cox
wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will fail to package is pretty far from
perfection
in my book
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:19:23PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
No, I guess you've still misunderstood. I don't
know how many times I
can say this, but let me try to explain once more:
your port should be
buildable with the default settings of all ports
involved.
This means that you
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and installs it,
even though I specified these:
WITH_MYSQL= yes
WANT_MYSQL_VER= 323
IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL=5
Starting with a system that had no MySQL or PHP
installed on it, I did a make
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred Cox
wrote:
Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and installs
it,
even though I specified these:
WITH_MYSQL= yes
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
It's still better than the current situation.
Publishing packages that will not run because
they're linked to the
wrong libraries is, again, not my idea of better.
There is no linkage problem. It's a client/server
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:49:52PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
Then you haven't explained yourself very well,
because at the start of
this thread you were talking about a conflict
between the mysql 3 and
mysql 5 *clients*, not servers.
I haven't been able to verify for sure that using
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:45:13PM +0400, Sergei Vyshenski wrote:
Dear port experts,
Being a maintainer of the port security/p5-openxpki,
I have got a message from the robot of Mark Linimon, which
marked my port broken because my pkg-plist has lines:
@dirrmtry
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:59:48PM +0200, Bj?rn K?nig wrote:
Hello,
I need some help to repair the broken port mysqltcl. It worked for a
long time without problems but approximately one week ago something
changed fundametally so that it doesn't compile anymore on pointyhat.
Probably an
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:28:26PM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
Hey, the problem with this package aren't solved already?
Talk to the maintainer, that's his job.
Kris
pgpuby1pCRfP1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:00:02PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
www/dotproject is still 2.0.2, even though 2.0.4 came
out in June to address an XSS vulnerability. See
http://www.dotproject.net/ for details.
I've sent mail to the maintainer and the contact for
portaudit, with no response in over
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:56:49AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 01:44 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:32:18AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:52:01 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:45:56PM -0300, Rainer Alves wrote:
Erwin Lansing wrote:
In preparation for the 6.2 release, the ports tree will be frozen from
October 10.
[...]
Just wondering if there's a chance of seeing Gnome 2.16 committed before
the freeze (I'm asking this since
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:32:18AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:52:01 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:45:56PM -0300, Rainer Alves wrote:
Erwin Lansing wrote:
In preparation for the 6.2 release, the ports tree will be frozen
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:22:15AM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be
appreciated.
Three of the ports I maintain have decided that the man pages
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:25:14AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:22:15AM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a
strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be
appreciated
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:44:27PM -0500, Patrick Reich wrote:
Hi all,
mgetty is currently marked as broken due to incomplete
pkg-plist. Just checking to see if this might be
corrected in time for 6.2.
I hope so :) The maintainer didn't respond yet though - so perhaps
someone else can
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:54:44PM +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Hi!
We are going to update all sdl ports to latest version.
This will require modifications to sdl-dependent ports,
and we are currently doing full build in tinderbox
to ensure that all goes right.
Please hold you commits
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:26:48PM +0200, Dominique Goncalves wrote:
Hi,
According to Security Advisories SA-06:19 about OpenSSL, we need to
rebuild ports which are statically linked to libcrypto(3).
Is there a magic command to rebuild these ports ?
Unfortunately not. The only thing you
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:08:59PM -0300, Dario Basso Cardoso wrote:
Hi, when i try install /usr/ports/database/clip in my FreeBSD 4.9 i
receive this message:
ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
Looks like you installed a FreeBSD 6.x package on your 4.x system.
You should make
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:49:35AM -0400, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Hi again, Kris,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
No, that's fine. You need to a) confirm you are really getting the
error you posted, b) if so, check why the file it mentions cannot be
read.
So, I should re-run cvsup and portsdb
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Can anyone tell me what broke here?
Updating collection ports-base/cvs
Finished successfully
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..eclipse-3.1.2: /usr/ports/www/firefox non-existent --
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:48:26PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:19:24AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:35:03PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 9/4/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:48:26PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:25:09PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
BTW, I wonder why www/phpmyfaq is not in your list.
What a+w file does it install?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ find /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq -perm -a+w
/usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/inc
/usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/images
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 06:21:31PM -0700, Loren M. Lang wrote:
I have a port I am writing which uses an unusual way of distributing
tarballs. The only download for official sources that I can tell is
through their web source control interface. They have a URL which
provides a tarball of a
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable
files or directories. In most cases this opens the system to all
kinds of attacks. A simple grep brings the following list of
makefiles to attention. I imagine that
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:20:06PM +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:17:10 -0400
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Thanks, let us know when you have something ready for testing,
although it will probably have to wait until after the 6.2 release
cycle
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:16:57AM -0500, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 28 August 2006 09:06, Erwin Lansing wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX - please wait.. Done.
make_index: htdig-3.2.0.b6_2: no entry for /usr/ports
Hello Irwin,
Dear Donold :-)
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:45:37AM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
If this comes up every few months, then it's really needed, isn't it?
No, it means that a handful of people think that it would be great if
the rest of the people all started doing more work
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:21:38PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
When/if we get a new VCS, where branching is not as painful
as it is now, I expect it to be used extensively by developers.
Projects can be then brought back into our main repo from
marcuscom, p4 and other local repos. We
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:39:55AM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:33:35PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
II Solutions
Yeah, I'm going to talk about ports tree tagging again :-). So what I
propose: having HEAD and STABLE
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 04:33:35PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
II Solutions
Yeah, I'm going to talk about ports tree tagging again :-). So what I
propose: having HEAD and STABLE (or whatever you want't to call it,
so e.g. not to confuse with src/) branches. Committers commit all
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to
go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem.
My preferred solution involves a couple
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:35:22PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:17:02AM +0200, Hans Lambermont wrote:
While upgrading vlc-0.8.4a_2 to vlc-0.8.5_2 I ran into :
=== bison-1.75_2,1 conflicts with installed package(s):
bison-2.1_2
In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk I see for bison :
.if defined(USE_BISON)
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg-config: not found
Makefile, line 24: warning: pkg-config gtk+-2.0 gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0
--cflags returned non-zero status
pkg-config: not found
Makefile, line 25: warning: pkg-config gtk+-2.0 gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0 --libs
returned non-zero status
Looks like
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi!
We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at
4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using
USE_BZIP2 knob and doing
301 - 399 of 399 matches
Mail list logo
