On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:20:23 +0800 Christopher Hall
christopherhall@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Bill,
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:34:35 -0400
Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:44:51 +0800
Christopher Hall christopherhall@gmail.com wrote:
When running
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:44:51 +0800
Christopher Hall christopherhall@gmail.com wrote:
When running PostgreSQL with the uuid-ossp extension the server fails
with signal 10 (bus error).
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/uuid-freebsd/
--
Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/168583
This bugger is about a month old at this point. Of course,
part of that is my fault for being slow to respond, so I'm
just putting a heads-up out -- if anyone is able to commit
that, it'd be great.
--
Bill Moran
http
, 9 Mar 2010 20:33:48 -0500
From: Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
To: v...@freebsd.org
Subject: VirtualBox coredump on FreeBSD 8 during build
FreeBSD monster 8.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p1 #3: Sun Dec 13 14:53:34
EST 2009 r...@monster:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Ports tree
On 1/23/10 3:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/23/10 10:16, Martin Wilke wrote:
Before we get more mails with the question why we not update
firefox to 3.6, the answer is easy, nox@ found some problems
with some plugins, this problem seems to be only FreeBSD
releated under Linux or Windows seems
, it just has that single patch to fix a known problem.
For me, I think that would be the preferred method in this case.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
In response to Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com:
--On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:31:21 -0500 Bill Moran
wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
In response to Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com:
I am the maintainer for security/barnyard2. This is an updated version of
security
understand your purpose
in spamming three mailing lists with this demand. What problem are you
trying to solve?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
copy of mailman in each jail. This will keep them happily
independent of each other.
That's obviously not the only way to get what you want, just my
suggestion.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran
, and there's absolutely no reason for it to continue.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
In response to Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Bill Moran wrote:
How about:
Options for port-fu
[ ] BRG Bernstein Riggs Guillotine parsing
[X] QFZ Quantum Freeze Zulu rending
At least that one gives me _some_ idea what those TLAs mean
you complained about are
already in the right place.)
In all seriousness, what did you expect was going to happen as a result
of your email? What did you really hope to accomplish?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports
In response to Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
It's a combination of a number of issues:
1) The ports infrastructure shouldn't let you set options that don't make
sense.
I think that one could argue that it should be _hard_ to set options
that don't make sense
, all is fine.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only
In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a
FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008
In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD
, but it seems as if a tweak
to make it respect that setting would be nice.
On a (possibly) related note, that port seems to require openldap-2.3
and the build breaks because I have openldap-2.4 installed.
Unfortunately, I don't have time to investigate that now.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:28:14PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
The above mentioned port is marked BROKEN because it does not build with
GCC 4.2
Are you sure you are looking at the right port?
Yes.
print/lyx15 is marked
BROKEN on all platforms
The above mentioned port is marked BROKEN because it does not build with
GCC 4.2
I commented out the BROKEN line, figuring I'd see if I could help fix it,
but much to my surprise it built without problems and runs just fine.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
the issue as a PR so it's
officially tracked. If the maintainer does not respond withing a
reasonable length of time, request a maintainer timeout to have another
committer check in the patch.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports
In response to Vladimir Zorin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vladimir Zorin wrote:
I tried to get in touch with Alex Dupre, the maintainer of the
bsd.php.mk, sent him the same text as the above with the patch, but I
didn't get
.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to hear the opinion of a lawyer
as to whether this is acceptable or not.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
.
Of course, I am not a lawyer either, so you should consult with one
before entering into any important agreement.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
a vote, I vote for the following:
a) We ban Tuomo from our lists.
b) We remove all his software from the ports and refuse to accept
any more by him.
The guy is obviously just around to start flame wars.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
days rule. If he's going to demand that his terms be
followed, then it has to come out of the ports.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
that FreeBSD isn't a Linux distro, and maybe they'll
start feeding you accurate information instead of making you look insane.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
In response to Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2007-12-12, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's impossible for the FreeBSD ports system to guarantee compliance with
his arbitrarily chosen 28 days rule.
There is no 28 days rule. There is a latest release in 28 days
_always_ been done. If the original maintainer is no longer keeping up
with the software, then someone else needs to step up.
It's his software. If his requirements can't be met, then the port comes
out of the tree. What else do you expect to happen?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
середа 12 грудень 2007 06:35 по, Bill Moran Ви написали:
It's his software. If his requirements can't be met, then the port comes
out of the tree. What else do you expect to happen?
I expect the port-removal to be initiated/done in an orderly
and
committed to the official FreeBSD docs, it won't result in
unmaintained garbage.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
things of
volunteers usually doesn't win you a lot of friends. Consider
using phrases like, is there any way I can help speed up the
process It's quite possible that ale@ is working on it, and
having some testers would be helpful to him.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
community
*) try to find a community that you can interact with more successfully
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
for me, I'd be happy :)
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In response to Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make
Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
fetching, and do it anyway.
That still doesn't help with the problem
be better. Something like, Would a committer
please look at 113611 then mention in the email what port it
relates to and comment that the person responsible seems to be
timing out.
Have you contacted Araujo directly?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
sophisticated than it should be.
Does anyone know of a reason why this couldn't be changed to allow
fetching of conflicting ports distfiles?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
In response to Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server]# make
fetch-recursive
=== Fetching all distfiles for postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 and dependencies
=== postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 cannot install: the port wants
)
I think what Bill was asking about, though, was why the IGNORE in
the port is getting hit for make fetch. For make or make install
or other such things, it seems valid, but for fetching distdata it
seems erroneous.
That is correct. I apologize if I was unclear earlier.
--
Bill Moran
In response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon):
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:58:55AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Why? Is there a legitimate reason why the fetch process refuses to
download this?
The intention of the logic is to warn a user, as soon as possible, that
they are spending time
,
it just reports it and aborts.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In response to Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
My thought is to make /usr/ports/private (or similar) and teach cvsup
not to blow it away. Then I just need to make sure that portupgrade
and other tools see it.
Does anyone have a HOWTO
this has been discussed before but I can't find any reference to it now.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
considerations.
mail/postgrey
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. I have to know ... who took all the time to write that all
up?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems, post the details of where you get stuck to the list and I'm sure
others will help out.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
a PR. If I don't hear back from someone within a week
or so, I'll ping the mailing list asking a committer to look at it, but
usually someone jumps in and takes care of it.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
the support.
Somebody would know as to solve the problem.
The FreeBSD port does not currently have an option to enable LDAP
support. You'll need to patch the Makefile.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
?
Depends. Do you allow untrusted users to log in to that machine? If
so, then you've probably got the best approach. Make sure that .pgpass
file is chmoded 600
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Anton Blajev - Valqk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Group,
I'm wondering what tool to use for system and processes monitoring?
For example your disks goes filled and you get a mail,
the machine has load over 50 for more than an hour and you get a mail...
Some predefined processes MUST be
Anton Blajev - Valqk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Anton Blajev - Valqk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Group,
I'm wondering what tool to use for system and processes monitoring?
For example your disks goes filled and you get a mail,
the machine has load over 50 for more
mailserver.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In response to Shaun Amott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:39:50PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Why should the fetch-recursive target care what's installed? Hell, I just
want the distfile on the server so I can install it on other machines.
I agree. Perhaps we should
In response to Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Shaun Amott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:39:50PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Why should the fetch-recursive target care what's installed
there are workarounds, but I'd like to
get this fixed if possible.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's
not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is
what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as
part of the same pr? Obviously the one can't be
Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored?
/var/db/ports/portname
But the canonical way to adjust these is with make config in the port
directory.
-Bill
___
In response to Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:09:43PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Noticed that the rsync port has an rcng compliant script for starting
rsync in daemon mode. Nice.
Unfortunately, rsync doesn't seem to write its pidfile to /var/run
, /usr/ports, etc.
portupgrade updates the information in /var/db/pkg. If make update
doesn't change /var/db/pkg, then the two will not affect one another,
for better or for worse.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended
in the absence of a packing
list ... are packing lists even required any more? Does the porters
handbook need updated? Are eggs good for you or bad for you?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only
In response to Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:24:46AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Now, crack.so is in /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/crack.so, so it would
appear as if my pkg-plist needs updated. No worries ...
except I'm a little unclear on the build magic
In response to Juergen Lock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(Btw did 4.x have aio? If not we need to add an
IGNORE now I guess...)
From the aio man page:
HISTORY
The aio facility appeared as a kernel option in FreeBSD 3.0. The aio
kernel module appeared in FreeBSD 5.0.
--
Bill Moran
-p10
Ports tree updated earlier today.
Any thoughts?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
In response to Bjorn Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill,
On Aug 21, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/www/bacula-web]# make fetch
This port requires the Apache Module or the CGI version of PHP, but
you have
already installed a PHP port without them
In response to Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:07:59PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/www/bacula-web]# make fetch
This port requires the Apache Module or the CGI version of PHP, but you have
already installed a PHP port without them
on the secured systems.
It would make life easier if make fetch and make fetch-recursive
could ignore these kinds of dependency errors. It seems to me that
make fetch* should _never_ fail because of dependencies.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
FreeBSD vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE #4: Tue May 16 12:43:32 EDT 2006 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VANQUISH i386
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
69 matches
Mail list logo
