On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 20:37 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Coleman Kane wrote:
I haven't seen any activity on the above email, and I am curious if:
1) It was missed (and this really does affect people)
2) Nobody cross-compiles using the mingw32-* ports (it is really very
Coleman Kane wrote:
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello ports,
Latest versions of `mingw32-binutils' and `mingw32-bin-msvcrt' were
committed.
`mingw32-gcc' is on pipeline.
But it is BIG update: new version is 4.2.0
I ask you to test this `almost new' port before commit.
http
the explanation given on
GNU make's manual.
--
Coleman Kane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
on their multi-core boxes suddenly uses a lot more CPU time.
BTW, Good work, Pav! Thank you for taking the time to do what so many of
us wanted but wouldn't do.
--
Coleman Kane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:19 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Coleman Kane píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 10:58 -0400:
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Niclas Zeising píše v út 24. 03. 2009 v 15:28 +0100:
Not to nitpick or be an annoyance, but you might want to document
this, before it actually builds the target list:
mytarget: deps dep2 ...
/usr/local/bin/gmake -C $(mytargetdir) mytarget
Which may confuse it.
Here's a link to the ambiguous description on the GNU make website:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/make/Error-Messages.html
--
Coleman Kane
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 16:02 -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:43 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Question,
I'm testing my ports for MAKE_JOBS_SAFE-ness, and came across this
message when building xscreensaver (which uses gmake):
gmake[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 23:02 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hello,
I
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hello,
I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
it doesn't seem to regress anything for me, and I can use
thunderbird 3 with --with-system-png=/usr/local in my .mozconfig. I'd
like to see some other testers, and get a comment from the graphics/png
maintainer.
--
Coleman Kane
--- graphics/png/Makefile
+++ graphics/png/Makefile
@@ -7,6 +7,7
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 02:28 +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 01:22:34PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here:
* http://littlesvr.ca/apng/.
This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest
source tree
]
--
Coleman Kane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
as you to get a fonctionnal
port.
thanks for your reply.
best regard
jean-christophe.
Probably not until they release a new driver. However, I've just been
following their git tree directly and that works pretty well for me.
--
Coleman Kane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
instead of www/neon26 ?
--
Coleman Kane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
detection
properly using the if_ndis driver. Mine keeps telling me that the signal
strength is always 100% no matter where I walk in my apt.
--
Coleman Kane
diff --git a/net/gnome-netstatus/Makefile b/net/gnome-netstatus/Makefile
index 2e6c3f0..08be832 100644
--- a/net/gnome-netstatus/Makefile
in enigmail-tb for me now... but I may take a couple days time
getting reports back to you.
--
Coleman Kane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, above, is to set the build jdk to bsdjava for FreeBSD
8.0+, which results in having Mk/bsd.java.mk look for the ports
source-build rather than using the diablo-jdk for doing java compiles.
For other versions of FreeBSD, the default is left at what it was before
(diablo, then ports).
--
Coleman
(and maybe copy gnome@ as well).
Unless it breaks something more, I'll commit it in the next couple days.
--
Coleman Kane
diff --git a/security/seahorse/Makefile b/security/seahorse/Makefile
index a065a09..d5d417f 100644
--- a/security/seahorse/Makefile
+++ b/security/seahorse/Makefile
@@ -8,6 +8,7
Marcin Cieslak wrote:
Yuri Pankov wrote:
AFAICT, it only affects amd64. Maybe USE_GCC can be 3.4 on amd64, and 3.4+
elsewhere?
Don't know if it helps at all, but seamonkey works with enigmail very
nice, using gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 on amd64 (7.0-PRERELEASE,
seamonkey
you want installed)
pkg_delete -f xf86-\*
make deinstall clean install
--
Coleman Kane
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should be
modified so that it displays a message warning the user that it won't
work after it is installed.
AFAICT, it only affects amd64. Maybe USE_GCC can be 3.4 on amd64, and
3.4+ elsewhere?
Thoughts? Comments?
--
Coleman Kane
___
freebsd-ports
.
HTH,
--
Coleman Kane
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ and
built/installed it over the top of the one that is gotten from
/usr/ports/x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati.
--
Coleman Kane
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Coleman Kane wrote:
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello ports,
Latest versions of `mingw32-binutils' and `mingw32-bin-msvcrt' were
committed.
`mingw32-gcc' is on pipeline.
But it is BIG update: new version is 4.2.0
I ask you to test this `almost new' port before commit.
http
/port-mingw32-gcc-4.2.0.tar.gz
Many thanks to Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED], who helps me to prepare this
update.
I'd like to know what everyone else's experience with these new mingw32-
ports are. So far I have been building Win32 applications from my
FreeBSD box with these versions
is en_GB.UTF-8.
Probably the cause, I bet it would also give the warning with a CVS index.
Kris
I have the same error using en_US.UTF-8
--
Coleman Kane
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Danny Pansters writes:
/usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for
all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It
won't be missed or mourned :)
While I understand why this is going to
completely, I don't think this is user friendly.
I think I ran into this once a while back, I don't know what is the
correct solution.
Kris
--
Coleman Kane
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
.
Of course, to make proper use of distcc, at least #cores + 1 jobs are
required. I'll keep that in mind.
Cheers
Benjamin
I have always seen that NCPUS+1 was a good heuristic.
--
Coleman Kane
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
altered, but
the large memory allocation still occurs.
I am attaching a new patch to the camel/camel-object.c file that was
originally patched by:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/databases/evolution-data-server/files/Attic/patch-camel_camel-object.c
--
Coleman Kane
--- camel
30 matches
Mail list logo
