Doug Barton ha scritto:
What would make my life a whole lot simpler is if lang/php5 were the
command line version, and the cgi and apache modules were separate
ports. Is this feasible?
Short answer: no. Long answer: nothing is impossible ;-)
Extensions are compiled based on settings of the core
06.01.2012 06:20, Doug Barton wrote:
I do package build systems that support a variety of types of end
systems. (Nearly) all of them use php in some form or another, but a
substantial portion of them don't have web servers, and therefore don't
need the cgi, apache module, or the apache dependency
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:45:53 +1100
John Marshall wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012, 20:20 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > What would make my life a whole lot simpler is if lang/php5 were the
> > command line version, and the cgi and apache modules were separate
> > ports. Is this feasible?
>
> Don't the
On 01/05/2012 21:45, John Marshall wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012, 20:20 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> What would make my life a whole lot simpler is if lang/php5 were the
>> command line version, and the cgi and apache modules were separate
>> ports. Is this feasible?
>
> Don't the port's knobs work
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012, 20:20 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> What would make my life a whole lot simpler is if lang/php5 were the
> command line version, and the cgi and apache modules were separate
> ports. Is this feasible?
Don't the port's knobs work for you? If I set the CGI knob off, I get
what I
I do package build systems that support a variety of types of end
systems. (Nearly) all of them use php in some form or another, but a
substantial portion of them don't have web servers, and therefore don't
need the cgi, apache module, or the apache dependency that comes with them.
What would make
