- Original Message -
From: Yuri y...@rawbw.com
No, look at ports-mgmt/portupgrade, it is capable of upgrading ports
in-place quite happily in most cases. With the caveat that there might
be some special steps that need to be taken not covered by port itself.
This usually happens when
On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Yuri wrote:
My e-mail to the maintainer of www/wordpress bounced.
Please make sure there is the valid maintainer e-email specified for
wordpress.
Yuri
Thank you for volunteering to continuesly scan the maintainer addresses whether
or not they
are still
On 07/20/2010 10:45, Remko Lodder wrote:
Somehow I get the feeling that you do not understand Volunteer projects and
that you are not
thankfull for the hours people spend on software for YOU.
Remko,
What makes you think that I do not understand Volunteer projects and
not thankfull for
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:52:34AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
On 07/20/2010 10:45, Remko Lodder wrote:
Somehow I get the feeling that you do not understand Volunteer projects and
that you are not
thankfull for the hours people spend on software for YOU.
Remko,
What makes you think that
On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Yuri wrote:
On 07/20/2010 10:45, Remko Lodder wrote:
Somehow I get the feeling that you do not understand Volunteer projects and
that you are not
thankfull for the hours people spend on software for YOU.
Remko,
What makes you think that I do not
On 07/20/2010 12:11, Remko Lodder wrote:
Not about the mentioned parts.
But you are about:
Please make sure there is the valid maintainer e-email specified for
wordpress.
Without context and the like (should I mention that the original report to the
maintainer's email address is lacking
You are really reading much more into my message than was actually put there.
Sorry if that's my the style that triggered this. But I would like to assure
you that I wasn't even close to put anything against the ports or FreeBSD
community.
I communicate to maintainers a lot. And
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Yuri wrote:
You are really reading much more into my message than was actually put there.
That's not hard to do. :) I chose to read that part of your message as
if you had said, Dear FreeBSD ports committers. In trying to contact
the maintainer to report the problem
On 07/20/2010 14:07, Doug Barton wrote:
You are really reading much more into my message than was actually
put there.
That's not hard to do. :) I chose to read that part of your message
as if you had said, Dear FreeBSD ports committers. In trying to
contact the maintainer to report the
On 07/20/2010 13:12, Remko Lodder wrote:
Wordpress has the option to enable debugging, can you please try that? My
website (see my signature) is running on 8-STABLE, without issues, version from
thursday or something so fairly
recent.
Thanks,
Remko
(p.s. does httpd mention any BUS errors or
- Original Message -
From: Yuri y...@rawbw.com
No, no BUS or SEGFAULT.
My quick debugging didn't produce much results. This must be some
robustness issue. It looks most likely like an issue in WP itself. So I
filed the PR: http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14367
Sounds like an
On 07/20/2010 15:15, Steven Hartland wrote:
Sounds like an upgrade issue, possibly a broken theme or missing
dependency.
We're running WP 3 on FreeBSD here without problem, although we don't use
the port as I don't really see the need for WP tbh as its so easy to
install
anyway.
port
- Original Message -
From: Yuri y...@rawbw.com
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk
Cc: Remko Lodder re...@elvandar.org; po...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: Wordpress outputs an empty page after ports upgrade
On 07/20/2010 15:15, Steven Hartland
On 07/20/2010 16:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
I think you may have got the wrong end of the stick there. Ports can
be used
to uninstall the old and install the new version yes, but I don't
believe it
automates any of the upgrade process required for something like
wordpress
for you.
No, look
My e-mail to the maintainer of www/wordpress bounced.
Please make sure there is the valid maintainer e-email specified for
wordpress.
Yuri
Original Message
Subject:Wordpress outputs an empty page after ports upgrade
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:06:09 -0700
From
Yuri wrote:
After one of the recent upgrades I only get an empty page from
wordpress.
While _a_bit_more_ information would be helpdul check the order of the
php modules in your extensions.ini
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
Alexander Konovalenko k...@kth.se 2009-02-03:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com 2009-02-02:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch
wrote:
Alexander Konovalenko k...@kth.se 2009-02-01:
From:
Greetings,
could someone lend me an account on his FreeBSD machine for a couple of
days so that I can update sysutils/e2fsprogs to a new upstream release?
Any architecture will do.
I do not need root access, but I need to be able to ssh in and build ports,
obviously. It's easier for me if vim,
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com 2009-02-02:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch
wrote:
Alexander Konovalenko k...@kth.se 2009-02-01:
From: Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch
...
Could it
Alexander Konovalenko k...@kth.se 2009-02-01:
From: Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch
...
Could it be the case that firefox-bin hangs in umtxn state?
you're right!
(Check using ps -laux instead of -aux)
http://daemon.nanophys.kth.se/~kono/ktrace_ff2.txt
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com 2009-02-02:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch wrote:
Alexander Konovalenko k...@kth.se 2009-02-01:
From: Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch
...
Could it be the case that firefox-bin hangs in umtxn state?
you're
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch wrote:
Alexander Konovalenko k...@kth.se 2009-02-01:
From: Daniel Roethlisberger dan...@roe.ch
...
Could it be the case that firefox-bin hangs in umtxn state?
you're right!
(Check using ps -laux instead of -aux)
From: Cezary Morga c...@therek.net
...
Is it only Firefox or maybe other GTK2 apps are also affected?
I've run into similar problem after January 14th Gnome/GTK+ update,
which was acutally my fault, as I haven't upgraded it properly.
Recompiling Firefox along with the ports it depends on
Hi,
after recent port upgrade firefox2 and firefox3 do not work anymore. When I
start any of them nothing happens, no error message or window appears.
# ps -aux|grep firefox
USER 36787 0.0 0.1 7060 1388 ?? I12:02PM 0:00.00 /bin/sh -c
firefox3
USER 36788 0.0 0.1 7060 1468
Alexander Konovalenko wrote:
Hi,
after recent port upgrade firefox2 and firefox3 do not work anymore.
When I start any of them nothing happens, no error message or window
appears.
Is it only Firefox or maybe other GTK2 apps are also affected?
I've run into similar problem after January 14th
Alexander Konovalenko k...@kth.se 2009-01-31:
after recent port upgrade firefox2 and firefox3 do not work anymore. When I
start any of them nothing happens, no error message or window appears.
# ps -aux|grep firefox
USER 36787 0.0 0.1 7060 1388 ?? I12:02PM 0:00.00 /bin/sh -c
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:35:30 -0500
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:14:28PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Yoshihiro Ota, and lo! it spake thus:
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's not. Lots of ports change dependancies based on what's
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:46:03PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Yoshihiro Ota, and lo! it spake thus:
1. Is this about RUN_DEPENDS in makefiles?
Yes, but conditional.
For instance, see audio/teknap:
.if ${HAVE_GNOME:Mgtk12}!=
USE_GNOME+= gtk12
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-gtk
PKGNAMESUFFIX= -gtk
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:14:28PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Yoshihiro Ota, and lo! it spake thus:
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's not. Lots of ports change dependancies based on what's
installed, so if you install one thing you have to assume that any
other thing
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:48:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Yoshihiro Ota, and lo! it spake thus:
Q. Is it safe to assume all dependencies are STATIC?
A. Yes, it is.
No, it's not. Lots of ports change dependancies based on what's
installed, so if you install one thing you have to assume
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:49:39 -0700
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiro,
I'm happy to respond to you, but first I'd like to make clear that I'm
not trying to talk you out of anything. If there is a better way to
manage ports, or even just a different approach, I'm all for it. I
don't
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:59:36 -0500
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:48:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Yoshihiro Ota, and lo! it spake thus:
Q. Is it safe to assume all dependencies are STATIC?
A. Yes, it is.
No, it's not. Lots of ports change
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:49:39 -0700
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiro,
I'm happy to respond to you, but first I'd like to make clear that I'm
not trying to talk you out of anything. If there is a better way to
manage ports, or even just a
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
I think portmaster is also one tries to read and do the same things
but with shell script.
Not exactly the same things. Portmaster doesn't keep any external
database, it only updates what is in /var/db/pkg.
I personally didn't have good luck with portmaster and haven't
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve dependencies, I
came up with
yet another tool for
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Every time you run make install, portmaster, or portupgrade, there's
a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes. One of the things involved is
installing package information in /var/db/pkg. That's where pkg_version
gets its information from, along with portmaster
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:47:14 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
Portupgrade is not only slow reading INDEX file but also on dependency
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:57:34 -0700
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
I think portmaster is also one tries to read and do the same things
but with shell script.
Not exactly the same things. Portmaster doesn't keep any external
database, it only updates what is in
Hiro,
I'm happy to respond to you, but first I'd like to make clear that I'm
not trying to talk you out of anything. If there is a better way to
manage ports, or even just a different approach, I'm all for it. I
don't think portmaster is a one size fits all tool, and I'm not
trying to make it
Doug Barton wrote:
The other is to not use bash as your login shell, but rather to use
sh, then have a .profile that starts bash if it's available:
if [ -x /usr/local/bin/bash ]; then
exec /usr/local/bin/bash --login
fi
Hrrm, my actual .profile entry is more complicated than that,
Khaled Hussein wrote:
Last week i upgraded our servers when there was vulnerability on php,
clamav etc, but when i finished my upgrades i faced many problems, one
of it was i cannot login to some of my servers, it was bash issue
after upgrading gettext port, and i see in the
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve dependencies,
I came up with yet another tool for upgrading FreeBSD ports system. Unlink
other tools, it tries to maximize existing resource to maximize its
Last week i upgraded our servers when there was vulnerability on php,
clamav etc, but when i finished my upgrades i faced many problems, one
of it was i cannot login to some of my servers, it was bash issue
after upgrading gettext port, and i see in the UPDATING file that i
have to
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve
dependencies, I came up with
yet another tool for upgrading FreeBSD ports
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve dependencies, I
came up with yet another tool for upgrading FreeBSD ports system. Unlink other
tools, it tries to maximize existing resource to maximize its performance.
This
45 matches
Mail list logo
