Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com writes:
Yes, indeed, there was an old sort syntax, where they supported it in a form
+POS1 -POS2. It is a non-POSIX obsolete syntax, so we did not implement it
in the new BSD sort. I can add it, if necessary.
If anyone asked for my opinion, I'd say
Why to symlink, this is 1/ because it concerns user/admin
configuration,
I get that, but why is a conf file not the right answer? We could even
put the conf file in /etc if we decide that this is a feature that
should be in the base. Having 2 symlinks just seems like overkill.
IMO nether
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:33:06AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com writes:
Yes, indeed, there was an old sort syntax, where they supported it in
a form +POS1 -POS2. It is a non-POSIX obsolete syntax, so we did
not implement it in the new BSD sort. I
compatibility, he can easily
remove -D option from the Makefile.
Regards,
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org]
On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 11:15 AM
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi Folks,
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the
OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify.
The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg
On 2012.03.14. 22:10, Adrian Chadd wrote:
So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would
determine which was used.
'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at
its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right
one.
I prefer
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:08:52PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian alternatives system is
simpler than that:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/17/2012 03:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Why to symlink, this is 1/ because it concerns user/admin
configuration,
I get that, but why is a conf file not the right answer? We could even
put the conf file in /etc if we decide that this is a
I can imagine a netboot'ed system where the config in /etc/alternates/
is different for individual hosts, which have a shared root.
That way you can have two netbooted hosts with a shared read-only
rootfs, but a ramdisk /etc, with the locally configured mailer,
alternates, etc.
Adrian
On 03/17/2012 17:08, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I can imagine a netboot'ed system where the config in /etc/alternates/
is different for individual hosts, which have a shared root.
That way you can have two netbooted hosts with a shared read-only
rootfs, but a ramdisk /etc, with the locally
On 17 March 2012 17:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Sure, and in that situation the conf file in /etc would still work just
as well.
How will the conf file work? If there's a program like what
mailer.conf uses, sure. If the symlink is directly from sort to
/usr/bin/bsdsort, no so
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Thanks, it does help somewhat.
Unfortunately, I had already tried to instrument that line, and didn't
get anything useful. I probably still need to learn a bit more ruby in
order to figure out precisely
Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org writes:
On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org writes:
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since
the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
It wouldn't be bad if BSD sort supported it, but it should definitely be
fixed in the ports Makefile. I have submitted the fix in a PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166188
And I forgot to mark the PR with [PATCH]...
...@be-well.ilk.org]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 3:37 PM
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc: Chris Rees; Gabor Kovesdan; Oleg Moskalenko
Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available
Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org writes:
On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org
On 16 March 2012 22:39, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
It wouldn't be bad if BSD sort supported it, but it should definitely be
fixed in the ports Makefile. I have submitted the fix in a PR:
On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian alternatives system is simpler
than that:
http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/
The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks, which
at runtime
On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian alternatives system is simpler
than that:
http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/
[...]
This sounds like a good solution to more than
On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian alternatives system is
simpler than that:
http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/
[...]
(12/03/15 0:59), Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Hi Folks,
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since
the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to
modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko
oleg.moskale...@citrix.com showed
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14:28PM +, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian alternatives system is simpler
than that:
http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/
The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks,
Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org writes:
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since
the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to
modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg
Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com showed
On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org writes:
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since
the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to
modify. The development was a
: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:50 PM
To: Lowell Gilbert
Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; Oleg Moskalenko; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available
On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org writes:
some time ago
Rees
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:50 PM
To: Lowell Gilbert
Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; Oleg Moskalenko; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available
On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org writes
Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com writes:
There is no option -2 in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no
such option in Posix standard, too.
What is this option about, do we need to add something ?
No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem.
I'll take another look.
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com writes:
There is no option -2 in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no
such option in Posix standard, too.
What is this option about, do we need to add something ?
No, clearly
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com writes:
There is no option -2 in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no
such option in Posix standard, too.
What is
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com writes:
There is no option -2 in the
Jos Backus j...@catnook.com writes:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
Oleg Moskalenko oleg.moskale...@citrix.com
On 14 March 2012 08:59, Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the
OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify.
The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:59:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch
since the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was
hard to modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg
Moskalenko
On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:10, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer
programs using some magic alias program.
So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would
determine which was used.
'sort' would then be a
: Gabor Kovesdan; freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org; Oleg Moskalenko;
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available
On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:10, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer
programs using some magic alias program
I must be thinking of our mailer trick then?
I know i've seen it somewhere before.
Alternatives sounds fun though?
ADrian
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
35 matches
Mail list logo
