* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote:
Here's the patch I propose.
Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/maxima/Maxima-source/5.19.0-source/maxima-5.19.0.tar.gz
* Glen Barber (glen.j.bar...@gmail.com) wrote:
So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to
be the best solution (even if a temporary one if we'll be able to
resolve things with SF) as it will be clear which port uses the new
scheme and there will be no variety
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Dmitry Marakasovamd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
* Glen Barber (glen.j.bar...@gmail.com) wrote:
So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to
be the best solution (even if a temporary one if we'll be able to
resolve things with SF) as it
* Glen Barber (glen.j.bar...@gmail.com) wrote:
In that case, do you have GNATS access to close the PR I recently
filed because of SF fetch errors[1]? If not, I will post a followup
to have it closed.
[1] - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/137597
That one is the case, it
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dmitry Marakasovamd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
* Glen Barber (glen.j.bar...@gmail.com) wrote:
In that case, do you have GNATS access to close the PR I recently
filed because of SF fetch errors[1]? If not, I will post a followup
to have it closed.
[1] -
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:55:00PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote:
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
I fear the same, unfortunately.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Lars Engelslars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:55:00PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote:
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
and I guess that will affect many
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:56:49PM +0200, Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
Hi Hans,
I guess many of you have projects on SF and know this already, but the
changes is part of the new easy-to-use File Release System. Read more
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:41:03PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
Here's the patch I propose.
Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
Thank you Edwin for considering a some of my patch, I am pleased to
contribute to FreeBSD and especially when the contribution is well
accepted and applied.
Regards,
Sylvio César.
2009/8/12 Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:41:03PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
*
Hi!
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
Hopefully, the change only seem to affect new distfiles, so for now we
should just do extra checks for updates of ports hosted on sourceforge.
Here's
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:20:54PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
hi Dmitry,
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
I fear the same, unfortunately. However, I haven't as yet been able to
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Erwin Lansinger...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:20:54PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
hi Dmitry,
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
Here's the patch I propose.
Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/maxima/Maxima-source/5.19.0-source/maxima-5.19.0.tar.gz
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Dmitry Marakasovamd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
Hi!
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
[...]
As you can see, the distfile now redirects to another path and also
another mirror. As fetch doesn't follow redirects by default, this
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:41:03PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
Here's the patch I propose.
Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote:
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
I fear the same, unfortunately. However, I haven't as yet been able to
identify a consistency in the new
* Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org [2009-08-11]:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:41:03PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
Here's the patch I propose.
Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to
be the best solution (even if a temporary one if we'll be able to
resolve things with SF) as it will be
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Dmitry Marakasovamd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to
be the best solution (even if
20 matches
Mail list logo
