Re: USE_GMAKE fails in QATty?

2012-07-07 Thread Boris Samorodov
07.07.2012 13:14, Vitaly Magerya пишет: Hi, folks. I'm getting strange errors when building ports with USE_GMAKE=YES on redports. See for yourself: [1-3]. It seems that gmake is first built, but when it's time to install it -- turns out that it is already installed. This only happens in QATty

Re: USE_GMAKE fails in QATty?

2012-07-07 Thread Vitaly Magerya
On 07/07/2012, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: Seems that Mk/bsd.port.mk assumes that LOCALBASE for gmake is always /usr/local. Please, try the following patch. --- bsd.port.mk 1 Jul 2012 20:57:48 - 1.732 +++ bsd.port.mk 7 Jul 2012 12:20:17 - @@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@

Re: USE_GMAKE fails in QATty?

2012-07-07 Thread Boris Samorodov
07.07.2012 18:13, Vitaly Magerya пишет: On 07/07/2012, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: Seems that Mk/bsd.port.mk assumes that LOCALBASE for gmake is always /usr/local. Please, try the following patch. --- bsd.port.mk 1 Jul 2012 20:57:48 - 1.732 +++ bsd.port.mk 7 Jul 2012

Re: USE_GMAKE fails in QATty?

2012-07-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/07/2012 07:30, Boris Samorodov wrote: The problem comes down to the fact that redports/QATty changes LOCALBASE, but does not put it into PATH. Are ports are supposed to work without $LOCALBASE/bin in PATH? All ports should support non standard LOCALBASE. That wasn't the question. The

Re: USE_GMAKE fails in QATty?

2012-07-07 Thread Chris Rees
On Jul 7, 2012 3:30 PM, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: 07.07.2012 18:13, Vitaly Magerya пишет: On 07/07/2012, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: Seems that Mk/bsd.port.mk assumes that LOCALBASE for gmake is always /usr/local. Please, try the following patch. --- bsd.port.mk 1