Please, reset maintainer of the mail/spamd.
Version in the ports is buggy and outdated, and my PR`s are just ignored.
See:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=severity=priority=class=state=sort=nonetext=spamdresponsible=multitext=originator=release=
--
Best regards,
Alex
* Alex Samorukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-20]:
Please, reset maintainer of the mail/spamd.
Version in the ports is buggy and outdated, and my PR`s are just ignored.
See:
Synopsis: [PATCH] mail/spamd: core dump on spamd-setup with -t key
Responsible-Changed-From-To: delphij-freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 20 14:03:55 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Return to pool.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108657
Synopsis: [UPDATE] mail/spamd - improvements and clean up
Responsible-Changed-From-To: delphij-freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 20 14:16:31 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Return to pool.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=105277
Synopsis: [PATCH] mail/spamd: resolv conflict with sa-spamd and add
pfspamd_setup_flags
Responsible-Changed-From-To: delphij-freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 20 14:17:01 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Return to pool.
Synopsis: [PATCH] mail/spamlogd fail without PF
Responsible-Changed-From-To: delphij-freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 20 14:17:28 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Return to pool.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108679
Alex Samorukov wrote:
Please, reset maintainer of the mail/spamd.
Version in the ports is buggy and outdated, and my PR`s are just ignored.
See:
Hi,
I'd like to look for a new maintainer for mail/spamd. I have a tarball
which consists checked out version (i.e. have CVS/ directories to make
it easier for future updates) which may be useful for its new maintainer.
Please contact me off-list for this.
Cheers,
--
Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Synopsis: [patch] ports mail/spamd to reflect the public hostname in helo dialog
Responsible-Changed-From-To: delphij-freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: delphij
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 20 14:21:23 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Return to pool.
The following reply was made to PR ports/108663; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alex Samorukov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/108663: [PATCH] mail/spamd: resolv conflict with sa-spamd
and add pfspamd_setup_flags
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007
Synopsis: [PATCH] mail/spamd: resolv conflict with sa-spamd and add
pfspamd_setup_flags
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: delphij
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 20 15:16:59 UTC 2007
State-Changed-Why:
Committed, thanks!
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108663
The following reply was made to PR ports/108663; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dfilter service)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/108663: commit references a PR
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:16:50 + (UTC)
delphij 2007-03-20 15:16:44 UTC
FreeBSD ports
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: xotcl-1.5.3_3
Committers on the hook:
ahze clement clsung delphij miwi mnag pav rafan tobez vanilla
Most recent CVS update was:
U LEGAL
U
On 3/19/07, Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running pkgdb -Ff today gives me the following error:
Just a me too here, and this problem appears during
portupgrade runs, too.
Also, portupgrade-devel has been almost unusable for
me for some time now, on different machines. It's
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 3/19/07, Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running pkgdb -Ff today gives me the following error:
Just a me too here, and this problem appears during
portupgrade runs, too.
Also, portupgrade-devel has been almost unusable for
me for some time now, on
Greetings!
brbr
Are you happy with your results from Social Linux Expo 2007? Did you have what
it takes to make the difference between creating excitement and blending in
with the competition, between lots of hot leads and a few hard sells ...
between success and failure? br /
br /
Did you
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 3/19/07, Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running pkgdb -Ff today gives me the following error:
Just a me too here, and this problem appears during
portupgrade runs, too.
Try the patch please. I could not find a box where I can reproduce the
error, so
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: xotcl-1.5.3_3
Committers on the hook:
ahze clement clsung delphij ijliao miwi mnag naddy pav rafan tobez vanilla
Most recent CVS update was:
U
On 3/20/07, Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 3/19/07, Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running pkgdb -Ff today gives me the following error:
Just a me too here, and this problem appears during
portupgrade runs, too.
Try the patch please. I
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 02:55:09PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:16:22 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
As you may know, in the near future FreeBSD 7.x will be switching from
the gcc 3.4 compiler to gcc 4.x. Unfortunately your port
Quoting Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:20:18 +0100):
Doug Barton schreef:
As for the requirements in the ideas page ...
[...]
* storing old copies of shared libraries after shmajor number change
in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg
Portmaster doesn't do this
Hi,
as the attachment boinc-setiathome-enhanced-5.13.log shows, the
astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced port fails to configure on the ia64
platform. As I only have an i386, on which the port builds fine, I
can't pinpoint the error myself, but I'm thinking that the configure.ac
or maybe one of the
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: xotcl-1.5.3_3
Committers on the hook:
acm ahze clement clsung delphij ijliao lth lx miwi mnag naddy pav rafan
tmclaugh tobez vanilla will
Most recent
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:20:18 +0100):
Doug Barton schreef:
As for the requirements in the ideas page ...
[...]
* storing old copies of shared libraries after shmajor number change
in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg
Portmaster
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:47:25PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:20:18 +0100):
Doug Barton schreef:
As for the requirements in the ideas page ...
[...]
* storing old copies of shared libraries after
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of
your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
Hi all,
I know this may be more of a questions@ type of question, but I was
wondering if some people could provide me with short history (beyond the
last 3 months) and the tipping points of portmaster vs the portupgrade,
portinstall, etc tools.
I know portmaster is a bourne shell script and
Hi all,
I understand 4.11 is dead, but I've still got about 20 odd boxes to take
care of for the next few months until we can figure out what breaks in 6.x
for us.
I saw that it's recommended to use the RELEASE_4_EOL tag when updating
the ports tree to make sure that we have a stable ports
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:52:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I know this may be more of a questions@ type of question, but I was
wondering if some people could provide me with short history (beyond the
last 3 months) and the tipping points of portmaster vs the portupgrade,
After upgrading to Gnome 2.18 from 2.16 [in which I mostly used
packages from marcuscom], I receive the following error when trying to
open an image using Eye of Gnome 2.18 (eog-2.18.0.1):
Couldn't load image 'gnome-failed.jpg'.
Unable to load image-loading module:
Gary Kline wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 08:52:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi all,
I know this may be more of a questions@ type of question, but I was
wondering if some people could provide me with short history (beyond the
last 3 months) and the tipping points of portmaster vs the
Sticky Bit wrote:
One feature I would like to see implemented is a switch 'list only ports
that have available updates'. I want to know all affected ports in
summary before the builds so I am able to make decisions (i.e.
'portmaster -a' or just 'portmaster port'
pkg_version -Ivl''
--
Alex
At Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:04:28 +0800,
Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
On 四, 3 08, 2007 at 17:01:11 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:21:43 - (UTC),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) update the PCS port to grab my version
I think this is the ideal way to handle the
35 matches
Mail list logo
