2016-10-14 8:14 GMT+02:00 Loïc BLOT :
> FreeBSD ports are complicated ?
> Does someone of you tryed to do a Debian package, it's even more
> complicated as you should modify many path, split package in multiple
> packages, do the service engineering with systemV or systemD, etc ?
It's not writing
On 13/10/2016 5:42 AM, David Demelier wrote:
2016-10-12 10:04 GMT+02:00 Andrea Venturoli :
On 10/12/16 09:24, Matthieu Volat wrote:
And GNU/Linuxes can be a PITA when you have to track -dev(el) packages
(which sometimes really requires -bin, -app or whatever), or worst, describe
to people how
On 13/10/2016 10:33 AM, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:59:47 -0700
Julian Elischer wrote:
As the number of dependencies between packages get ever higher, it
becomes more and more difficult to compile packages and the
dependence on binary precompiled packages is increased. Ho
After some rudimentary performance testing I note that we get up around 3%
improvement in application performance when we use gcc5 for our package
builds.
However building ports with gcc results in gcc5 being a dependency.
Examining ldd, we find that rarely does anything require gcc5's shared libs
Le 14/10/2016 à 09:34, Julian Elischer a écrit :
> On 13/10/2016 5:42 AM, David Demelier wrote:
>> 2016-10-12 10:04 GMT+02:00 Andrea Venturoli :
>>> On 10/12/16 09:24, Matthieu Volat wrote:
>>>
And GNU/Linuxes can be a PITA when you have to track -dev(el) packages
(which sometimes really
On 14/10/2016 12:48 AM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
After some rudimentary performance testing I note that we get up around 3%
improvement in application performance when we use gcc5 for our package
builds.
However building ports with gcc results in gcc5 being a dependency.
Examining ldd, we find th
hello,
i would like to ask if it is possible to update the port www/magento to
its current version.
it is currently on version 1.8.1 which is more than 2 years old.
the most recent version would be 2.1.2 or 2.0.10 according to
https://www.magentocommerce.com/download
kind regards,
Alexander
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:54:07AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 14/10/2016 à 09:34, Julian Elischer a écrit :
> > On 13/10/2016 5:42 AM, David Demelier wrote:
> >> 2016-10-12 10:04 GMT+02:00 Andrea Venturoli :
> >>> On 10/12/16 09:24, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> >>>
> And GNU/Linuxes can be a
Hi!
> i would like to ask if it is possible to update the port www/magento to
> its current version.
> it is currently on version 1.8.1 which is more than 2 years old.
> the most recent version would be 2.1.2 or 2.0.10 according to
> https://www.magentocommerce.com/download
Can you provide a pa
On 14.10.2016 11:13, Alexander Liebau wrote:
hello,
i would like to ask if it is possible to update the port www/magento to
its current version.
it is currently on version 1.8.1 which is more than 2 years old.
the most recent version would be 2.1.2 or 2.0.10 according to
https://www.magentocom
On 14/10/2016 6:48 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> After some rudimentary performance testing I note that we get up
> around 3% improvement in application performance when we use gcc5 for
> our package builds.
>
> However building ports with gcc results in gcc5 being a dependency.
> Examining ldd,
On 10/14/16 10:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> We could imagine tagging the plist/manifest so pkg can allow a user to install
> only the things tagged as runtime for exemple which would do the job. for what
> Julian is asking for beside adding lots of complexity pkg(8) and adding a
> nightmare in t
On 14.10.2016 12:15, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 14.10.2016 11:13, Alexander Liebau wrote:
hello,
i would like to ask if it is possible to update the port www/magento to
its current version.
it is currently on version 1.8.1 which is more than 2 years old.
the most recent version would be
2016-10-14 11:22 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin :
> It is imho doable in both sides.
>
> We could imagine tagging the plist/manifest so pkg can allow a user to install
> only the things tagged as runtime for exemple which would do the job. for what
> Julian is asking for beside adding lots of complex
On 14/10/2016 09:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 13/10/2016 10:33 AM, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:59:47 -0700
Julian Elischer wrote:
As the number of dependencies between packages get ever higher, it
becomes more and more difficult to compile packages and the
dependence on
Hi!
> > This is an appliance class machine. It has 2G of storage and that has
> > to include 2 copies for the OS so we can ping-pong for upgrades.
>
> I can get > 2GB CPU cache per system (spread over 8+ sockets) these
> days. Is it really reasonable to expect port maintainers to take up the
>
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:05:35 +0200
David Demelier wrote:
> 2016-10-14 11:22 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin :
> > It is imho doable in both sides.
> >
> > We could imagine tagging the plist/manifest so pkg can allow a user to
> > install
> > only the things tagged as runtime for exemple which would
a new port would be quite nice.
i am pretty clueless about creating or maintaining one though :(
regards,
alex
-- Originalnachricht --
Von: "Torsten Zuehlsdorff"
An: "Alexander Liebau" ; po...@freebsd.org
Gesendet: 14.10.2016 12:49:12
Betreff: Re: www/magento port outdated
On 14.10
On 14/10/2016 4:27 AM, Matthieu Volat wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:05:35 +0200
David Demelier wrote:
2016-10-14 11:22 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin :
It is imho doable in both sides.
We could imagine tagging the plist/manifest so pkg can allow a user to install
only the things tagged as runt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, David Demelier wrote:
> It's not writing a port that is complicated, it's the whole
> infrastructure.
You should see the Macports infrastructure... Fairly easy for the end
user, but those developers sweat blood to make it so.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don
Hi All,
I just updated https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212468 patch
attachment to build the latest release of prometheus. It's now 1.2.1
Can I get a committer to review, and possibly commit? This new port request
and my other one (node_exporter:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla
Hi!
> I just updated https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212468 patch
> attachment to build the latest release of prometheus. It's now 1.2.1
Well, the version number in the patch was 1.1.3, but
changing that to 1.2.1 was easy, test-building was OK, so: done.
> Can I get a committer
23 matches
Mail list logo
