Re: vim - GTK2 or GTK3?

2019-01-05 Thread Adam Weinberger
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:43 AM Niclas Zeising wrote: > > On 1/3/19 6:08 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > Adriaan de Groot wrote on 2019/01/03 14:28: > >> Niclas wrote: > >> > >> On Thursday, 3 January 2019 13:00:02 CET > >> freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org > >> wrote: > Firefox and Chromium

Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/ocaml

2019-01-05 Thread Serpent7776
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:31:41 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > Current version of ocaml is 4.02.3, but newest is 4.07. > > Could ocaml port be updated to newest version please? > > The attempt to do so can be followed at: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218333 >

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2019-01-05 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

qemu-arm-static has target_msqid_ds too small vs. arm natives msqid_ds

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The context here is FreeBSD head -r341836 based and ports head -r488859 based.] Note: I assume that "struct target_msqid_ds" is meant to match the memory layout of the target's native "struct msqid_ds". Otherwise the reported differences below could be irrelevant. For armv7 (and likely armv6)

qemu-arm-static has target_semd_ds too small vs. arm natives semid_ds

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The context here is FreeBSD head -r341836 based and ports head -r488859 based.] Note: I assume that "struct target_semd_ds" is meant to match the memory layout of the target's native "struct semid_ds". Otherwise the reported differences below could be irrelevant. For armv7 (and likely armv6)

qemu-arm-static has target_shmd_ds too small vs. arm native's shmid_ds

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The context here is FreeBSD head -r341836 based and ports head -r488859 based.] Note: I assume that "struct target_shmd_ds" is meant to match the memory layout of the target's native "struct shmid_ds". Otherwise the reported differences below could be irrelevant. For armv7 (and likely armv6)

qemu-*-static struct target_msgbuf is greatly mismatched with /usr/include/sys/msgbuf.h 's struct msgbuf

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The context here is FreeBSD head -r341836 based and ports head -r488859 based.] /usr/include/sys/msgbuf.h has: struct msgbuf { char *msg_ptr;/* pointer to buffer */ #define MSG_MAGIC 0x063062 u_int msg_magic; u_int msg_size;

qemu-arm-static has target_sigframe missing sf_fvp field so target_sigframe is too small

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The context here is FreeBSD head -r341836 based and ports head -r488859 based.] Note: I assume that "struct target_sigframe" is meant to match the memory layout of the target's native "struct sigframe". Otherwise the reported differences below could be irrelevant. For armv7 (and likely armv6)

qemu-arm-static has target_prpsinfo missing pr_pid field so target_prpsinfo is too small

2019-01-05 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The context here is FreeBSD head -r341836 based and ports head -r488859 based.] Note: I assume that "struct target_prpsinfo" is meant to match the memory layout of the target's native "struct prpsinfo". Otherwise the reported differences below could be irrelevant. Note: struct target_prpsinfo