Unless I am mistaken, the default version of PHP in FreeBSD is "version 7.1".
According to the PHP page, the 7.1 version was released on December 1, 2016,
Its EOL is scheduled for December 1, 2018 (this year) and security support
ends on December 1, 2019.
Wouldn't it be a wise decision to up the
On 31.12.18 21:03, Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote:
Hi!
Am I the only poudriere user that notices very long build times on an amd64
machine in i386 jails? This does not happen always, but frequently enough to be
a nuisance.
Can you say more about the rest of the setup ?
Filesyst
On 14.01.19 09:56, Gregory Byshenk wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 08:39:12PM -0500, Charles Sprickman via freebsd-stable
wrote:
On Jan 13, 2019, at 3:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I have a mission critical app server running an old PHP 5.6
application which will not work on PHP 7+.
wordpress 5
People using GeoIP for NGINX: GeoIP Port is EOL on 15.02.2019. [1]
So GeoIP will also be deleted on 15.02.2019 from NGINX. Please check
your config and switch to GeoIP2, for example.
Please also note the entry in UPDATING.
Cheers
Jochen
[1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&rev
Today GeoIP has reached its EOL and has been deleted from NGINX
Cheers
Jochen
On 15.01.19 17:02, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
People using GeoIP for NGINX: GeoIP Port is EOL on 15.02.2019. [1]
So GeoIP will also be deleted on 15.02.2019 from NGINX. Please check
your config and switch to GeoIP2
Am 12.08.2019 um 08:55 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker:
* Kevin Oberman [190812 01:50]:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 4:23 PM Martin Waschbüsch
wrote:
Am 11.08.2019 um 23:31 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker :
* Martin Waschbüsch [190811 20:41]:
[..]
You could also have used the quarterly branch, which keeps sof
Heya,
On the desktop I switched from FreeBSD to MacOS.
Therefore I am looking for a new home for the claws-mail ports.
So if you are interested in maintaining these ports in the future,
please send a message.
I hope I can leave this very good email client in good hands :)
Cheers
Jochen
_
Hi all,
i installed a new FreeBSD 12.1 amd64.
As next, i Install a new Jail with "bsdinstall jail /jails/jail1-www"
and update the jail with "freebsd-update -b /jails/jail1-www fetch install".
I mount the Ports-tree into the jail with a /etc/fstab.jail1-www:
/usr/ports /jails/jail1-ww
poudriere build fine for:
9.3 amd + i386
10.2 amd + i386
11-current r295432 amd + i386
Cheers
jochen
On 03/11/16 09:29, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Try to build lang/python27 within poudriere. The base system is running recent
> CURRENT, the jail used is a 10-STABLE, compiled locally on the CURRENT bo
Hi there,
how can I great a diff with a new patch?
I run make makepatch, and then I move the new patch in the /file folder.
Now I run svn diff > ~/dev/patches/foo.diff, but the new patch is not
into diff.
someone has a tip for me?
Cheers
Jochen
___
f
> Dear all,
>
>
> drush in ports (www/drush) is version 6.5. Stable version is 8.3.1,
> check here:
>
> https://github.com/drush-ops/drush
>
>
> Has anyone an update port available?
Did you ask the maintainer? [1]
>
> Thanks
> Matthias
Cheers
Jochen
[1] http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.p
Hi there,
I'm just trying to port net/abills.
Now, i testing the port with portlint:
# portlint
WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname "/usr/abills".
WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname "/usr/bin/perl".
0 fatal errors and 2 warnings found.
Now my question: how can I wr
>
> +--On 19 août 2016 11:59:20 +0200 Jochen Neumeister
> wrote:
> | Hi there,
> |
> | I'm just trying to port net/abills.
> |
> | Now, i testing the port with portlint:
> |
> |# portlint
> | WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname "/usr/a
On 29.08.2016 08:35, Rommel Escuadro wrote:
> What is the knowledge requirement for adopting a port?
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/contributing/ports-contributing.html
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
The following 12 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):
Installed packages to be UPGRADED:
kde-workspace: 4.11.21_1 -> 4.11.21_2
gstreamer-plugins-vp8: 0.10.23_3,3 -> 0.10.23_4,3
firefox: 49.0_3,1 -> 49.0_7,1
filezilla: 3.19.0 -> 3.21.0
feh: 2.16.1 -> 2.17.1
conky: 1.9
On 17.10.2016 08:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:09:12AM +0200, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
>> The following 12 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):
>>
>> Installed packages to be UPGRADED:
>> kde-workspace: 4.11.21_1 -> 4.11.21_
Hi,
i would like to update all jails from poudriere. The both FreeBSD 12
Jails are created via svn.
# poudriere jail -u -j 12amd64
[00:00:00] >> Upgrading using svn
[00:00:00] >> Updating the sources from svn.../lib/libc.so.7:
version FBSD_1.5 required by /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so.0 not
Hi there,
for a portupdate, i will create a new pkg-plist.
"make makeplist > pkg-plist" is not the right command:
make makeplist> pkg-plist
configure: WARNING: You will need re2c 0.13.4 or later if you want to
regenerate PHP parsers.
Does anyone have a tip?
Regards
Jochen
Hi there,
I'm trying to update the unmaintained port security/i2p from 0.9.16 to
0.9.26.
In poudriere, the port stop with a lot of java errors.
Can have anyone a look? I have no idea about this Problem.
Here the poudriere log:
http://builder.miwibox.org/data/10amd64-jochen/2016-10-20_07h13m32s/
:56, Michael Zhilin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please share new version of port?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jochen Neumeister
> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm trying to update the unmaintained port security/i2p from 0.9.16 to
&
I will update the net/wpa_gui.
# portlint
WARN: /usr/home/joneum/dev/ports/net/wpa_gui/files/patch-wpa_ctrl.c:
patch was not generated using ``make makepatch''. It is recommended to
use ``make makepatch'' when you need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure
proper patch format.
0 fatal errors and 1 w
On 27.10.2016 07:50, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
>> On 27 Oct 2016, at 7:47 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
>>
>> what am i doing wrong?
> Doesn't makepatch already place the new patches in files/?
>
No, make makepatch delete the patches into /files a
On 27.10.2016 08:08, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>> On 27 Oct 2016, at 7:53 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
>>
>> No, make makepatch delete the patches into /files and:
> If there are no patches in files/ maybe you have no patches applied
> in the work/ dir? Does running "
Hi there,
when i will install skype4 from the ports:
Installing linux-c6-dri-11.0.7...
pkg-static: linux-c6-dri-11.0.7 conflicts with
nvidia-driver-304-304.131_1 (installs files into the same place).
Problematic file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.1
*** Error code 70
I think, to deinstall the
Hi all,
I will update the devel/pear-File_Iterator Port.
The Project move from a own Website to Gitgub:
https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/php-file-iterator
I read the porters-handbook on
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html
but i am not su
I have a lof of PRs to Commit:
Maintainer timeout:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214323
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214341
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214354
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214872
Ready for com
Hi freebsd-ports,
could any committer take a look to PR 215325? It is a patch ready to
be committed.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
Hello everybody,
I have opened the PR 214665 on 19.11.2016. No reaction of the maintainer
until today. He also does not react to e-mails. What else can I do?
Is it normal that maintainers / committer will not respond?
Best regards
Jochen
___
freebs
I have opened the PR 214665 on 19.11.2016. No reaction of the maintainer
until today. He also does not react to e-mails. What else can I do?
Is it normal that maintainers / committer will not respond?
It can happen, especially if the problem is difficult to reproduce
for the maintainer/committ
There is an open PR for this Problem:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217024
Am 12.02.2017 um 14:54 schrieb Aryeh Friedman:
root@lilith:/usr/ports/editors/vim # freebsd-version && uname -a
11.0-STABLE
FreeBSD lilith 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #43 r313632: Sat Feb 11
03:4
Hello list,
I would like to rename a port. How is the best way?
Svn cp /port/oldname / port/newname
Svn remove /port/oldname
And then a diff with /port/oldname /port/newname?
Best regards
Jochen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://li
Hi,
We still have devel/pear 1.10.1 in the port tree: it is vulnerable,
although "pkg audit" does not report this.
1.10.3 has been out for almost a month now.
Do you have any plan to upgrade this?
Are you encountering any showstopper?
I hope to offer it at the weekend.
Regards
Jochen
__
Am 23.03.2017 um 16:13 schrieb Andrea Venturoli:
On 03/23/17 16:04, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
Hi,
We still have devel/pear 1.10.1 in the port tree: it is vulnerable,
although "pkg audit" does not report this.
1.10.3 has been out for almost a month now.
Do you have any plan to up
Hi Rainer,
Am 18.04.2017 um 11:27 schrieb Rainer Hurling:
After the shebang rules where intensified, many ports have been fixed
already. Many thanks for that!
For me, on 12.0-CURRENT, at least lang/go and www/libxul have non
fixed shebangs until now:
lang/go:
Error: '/bin/bash' is an inv
Hi,
see UPDATING from 20170316:
The python setuptools ports have been renamed to better match other
python ports.
Ports users need to rename them so that portupgrade and portmaster do not
get confused. For example:
pkg set -n py27-setuptools27:py27-setuptools
pkg set -o devel/py-setuptools2
Am 29.07.2017 um 14:01 schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder:
> ## Christoph Moench-Tegeder (c...@burggraben.net):
>
>>> I mailed it the maintainer. He said it is a local problem.
>> I'd like to disagree: the problem is caused by this:
> I have to retract this: a poudriere build (10.3 again) completes
Hey all,
i found this in my poudriere log for archivers/php-snappy:
==
===> Building package for php-snappy-0.1.8
pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec
file sizes/checksums [8]: . done
pack
Morning Matthias,
where is the new Version 5.1.0 from unicorn? On Github and the webpage i
found only Version 1.0.1
Greetings
Jochen
Am 11.02.2018 um 09:36 schrieb Matthias Fechner:
Dear all,
I need to update a rubygem port to version 5.1.0.4.gd5fbb
PORTNAME= unicorn
PORTVERSION=
Am 15.02.2018 um 17:35 schrieb scratch65...@att.net:
I upgraded to 11.1, and installed php72. But I'm getting a
httpd.conf error saying that "php7_module" is an undefined symbol
in the .so
It was okay in 7.1 -- did it change? Php.net doesn't seem to
have anything to say about it.
rebuild a
The port has grown a lot over the years on 3rd party modules, i'd like
to open a survey to figure out what modules are actually widely used.
The background of the survey is to find out which 3rd party modules are
used a lot, and which ones are very little or not at all anymore.
This should he
40 matches
Mail list logo