Hi, Reference:
> From: "reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports"
> Reply-to: reko.tu...@liukuma.net
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:39:45 +0300
"reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports" wrote:
> One of my users is needing rsync like functionality to transfer changed
> contents of some directorie
On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 6:51:05 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2016 1:21 AM, "Lars Engels" wrote:
>>
>> rsync 2 has a different algorithm for checking if a file changed. The
>> new one is much faster.
>
> Rsync 2 also spent a long time building a list of changes files first,
> befo
On Oct 17, 2016 1:21 AM, "Lars Engels" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:46:31AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 8:01:51 +0300, reko.turja--- via
freebsd-ports wrote:
> > >
> > > Greg, I've actually put some thought in making a local port of
> > > rsync2. I
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:46:31AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 8:01:51 +0300, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
> >
> > Greg, I've actually put some thought in making a local port of
> > rsync2. I've done some research on it and it seems to be fairly
>
Am 17.10.2016 um 00:46 schrieb Greg 'groggy' Lehey:
> On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 8:01:51 +0300, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>> Greg, I've actually put some thought in making a local port of
>> rsync2. I've done some research on it and it seems to be fairly
>> usable and security p
On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 8:01:51 +0300, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>
> Greg, I've actually put some thought in making a local port of
> rsync2. I've done some research on it and it seems to be fairly
> usable and security patched still.
Even simpler, use the old version of the c
On 14 October 2016 at 17:01, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
> > On 14 Oct 2016, at 7:54 AM, Eduardo Morras via freebsd-ports <
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sorry for commenting on this reply to Greg to answer Shane Ambler, I
> > joined maillist today.
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:2
> On 14 Oct 2016, at 7:54 AM, Eduardo Morras via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry for commenting on this reply to Greg to answer Shane Ambler, I
> joined maillist today.
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:26:03 +1100
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 13 October 2016 at 18:13:39 +1030
Sorry for commenting on this reply to Greg to answer Shane Ambler, I
joined maillist today.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:26:03 +1100
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 October 2016 at 18:13:39 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote:
> > On 13/10/2016 15:09, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports wrote:
> >> On
On 14/10/2016 08:56, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 13 October 2016 at 18:13:39 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 13/10/2016 15:09, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports wrote:
One of my users is needing rsync like functionality to transfer changed
contents of some directories between couple of
Thanks a lot for your suggestions!
Franco and Shane - I will definitely check cpdup out. Georges suggestion is
neat,
sadly for this usage pattern zfs isn't ideal - lack of memory, files are
transferred
between freebsd and linux etc. but it's definitely something I'll have to
remember
for the
On Thursday, 13 October 2016 at 18:13:39 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 13/10/2016 15:09, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports wrote:
>> One of my users is needing rsync like functionality to transfer changed
>> contents of some directories between couple of machines. As rsync 3
>> isn't open source, b
Am 13.10.2016 um 07:20 schrieb Peter Beckman:
> 2. Why is GPL3 out of the question? Is the user going to resell the
> device
>as a service? If the user is simply "using" the software, no
> disclosure
>of other software is necessary. Only if your user is attempting to
> "make
>money" fro
On 13/10/2016 15:09, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports wrote:
One of my users is needing rsync like functionality to transfer changed
contents of some directories between couple of machines. As rsync 3
isn't open source, but GPL3 it's out of question in order to keep the
system untainted.
The soft
If you want block efficient, then zfs is your friend
1) make the 'dir' be a distinct zfs filestore in the zpool
2) run zfssnap on some duty cycle
3) profit
seriously: as long as the copy can be maintained readonly, in sync
with the source, the block level copy of zfs snapshots under some
serial/t
> On 13 Oct 2016, at 6:39 AM, reko.turja--- via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>
> The software should be relatively lightweight - no fullblown mirroring/backup
> is needed. Also hints how to achieve similar ends using maybe tar/ssh might
> do.
Try cpdup(1).
Cheers,
Franco
1. rsync IS open source: https://rsync.samba.org/
"rsync is an open source utility"
2. Why is GPL3 out of the question? Is the user going to resell the device
as a service? If the user is simply "using" the software, no disclosure
of other software is necessary. Only if your user is att
One of my users is needing rsync like functionality to transfer changed
contents of some directories between couple of machines. As rsync 3 isn't
open source, but GPL3 it's out of question in order to keep the system
untainted.
The software should be relatively lightweight - no fullblown
mirr
18 matches
Mail list logo
