On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 15:14:59 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:03:05PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 April, 2007 at 14:47:30 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:30:42PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:37:41PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:53:40PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
All messages are already tagged with a List-ID
e.g.
List-Id: User questions freebsd-questions.freebsd.org
Do you have
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:38:52PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote:
Right. In an earlier message you mentioned mutt and procmail, so here
is a procmail/mutt solution. First off write a procmail recipe that
matches the mail list(s) you wish to flag. In the action line of said
recipe use formail to
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 21:21:47 Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:58:55PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I definitely agree that's suboptimal. I'd expand that to include other
sorts of pages, other than webpages, as well. It's pretty rare for this
particular brand of
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:44:20PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I fully expect that there isn't really an answer aside from using mutt's
list subscription functionality, which unfortunately overwrites the name
or email of the original sender in the diplay.
Color me surprised. N. J. Mann
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:31:45PM +0200, Irsla wrote:
On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi
what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Jeff Mohler wrote:
I dont think subject tagging is poor at all.
whats poor is overly long poorly organized subject lines..but hey..[FBSDQ]
aint all that long.
Then you get someone who either doesn't a) trim the subject or b) the
client response as such:
Re: [FBSDQ]
In Xorg.0.log what I found about graphical initialization was this:
=
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(II) NVIDIA(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section
Screen0 for depth/fbbpp 24/32
(==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==)
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:31:45PM +0200, Irsla wrote:
Hi,
On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0 vi
what about the -exec option of find ? I always wonder why people don't use
it.
find . -type f \(
Just my $0.02. Have you considered adding greylisting. I find the
combination of greylisting and Spamassassin with the SA's bayes filter
completely handles my spam problem. On my primary MX I use spamd on
OpenBSD and on my secondary MX I use spamd on FreeBSD. As a very
informal method of
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:47:26PM -0400, Alexey Kuzmenko wrote:
I've turned on debugging and visible password with:
kern.geom.eli.debug=3
kern.geom.eli.visible_passphrase=1
Did you make a reboot?
but have nothing in the dmesg concerning my ad0s2 partition and it
keeps telling Wrong key
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:03:59PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Jeff Mohler wrote:
I dont think subject tagging is poor at all.
whats poor is overly long poorly organized subject lines..but hey..[FBSDQ]
aint all that long.
Then you get someone who either doesn't a) trim
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:53:26 -0700
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:31:45PM +0200, Irsla wrote:
On 4/25/07, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
find . -type f \( -mtime 6 -o -mtime 29 \) -print0 | xargs -0
I have OpenLDAP running on FreeBSD 6.x. Simple, effective and reliable. You
can do the same with Active Directory, but you will need Windows 2003. Msg
me offlist if you want to talk about it more.
On 4/25/07, Pat Lashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a good way to provide a single
After my last cacti upgrade, I seen it totaly lost it's images and sounds like
it also lost it's css...
The strange... I mean _STRANGE_ thing is when analysing the HTML source... the
images are not even called!!!
No img anywhere
Any idea please ? Am I the only one in this case ?
Hello list,
what will portinstall do if I give it the --batch argument? Will it
compile the port with all options it knows or only the standard ones? I
ask because man 1 portinstall or man 7 ports is not informative
enough at this point.
With regards
Stevan Tiefert
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
i sent a post from a puter with a bad d key. that's why
my subject didn't say dmesg like it should have.
sorry.
here is a dmesg output:
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The
[partners_stgeorge_logo2.gif]
Unauthorized Access
In the last fews weeks, our Online Banking Security team has
observed multiple logons on your internet banking account, from
different blacklisted IP's, therefore been blocked,to prevent
further unauthorized access
I know this is OT but we got so many sysops here and this might be
something very easy for them to drop me a quick answer?
I have a data file formatted like this each block of data consist of
several lines; blocks are separated by empty lines like this
This is a
block
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Svein Halvor
Halvorsen
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:00 AM
To: Lee Capps
Cc: Thomas Dickey; Bill Moran; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the
Zhang (or Weiwu?), I'm surprised there are no good open source bug tracking
solutions out there already.
Sorry, I'm not familiar with ncurse, so can't comment on it. The system I
developed ten years ago was centered on Informix RDBMS, which included tools
for creating character-based forms
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
Hilton
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:25 PM
To: Grant Peel
Cc: Eric Crist; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Just my $0.02. Have you considered
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:47:49PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:38:52PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote:
#
Right. In an earlier message you mentioned mutt and procmail, so
here
is a procmail/mutt solution. First off write a procmail recipe
that
matches the mail list(s)
Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards resolving the
following network issue?
I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that consists of a router and 2 pc's,
one of which is running Windows XP Pro and the other Windows Vista. The lan is
connected to the Internet via a cable
On 4/26/07, L Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards resolving the
following network issue?
snip
1) Apr 25 13:33:19 SERVER kernel: arp 00:40:f4:47:fb:8e is using my IP
address xxx.xxx.x.xx!
2) dhcppc0# Apr 25 14:07:05 dhcpp0 kernel: arp:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007, L Goodwin said:
Will someone please lead me in the right direction towards
resolving the following network issue?
I just added a FreeBSD server to a LAN that consists of a router
and 2 pc's, one of which is running Windows XP Pro and the other
Windows Vista. The
Hi,
Sorry for bothering, but I coul not find the answer elsewhere.
Is Intel motherboard S5000PAL supported by FreeBSD 5.5, 6.2?
Best regards,
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
