On Sat, July 3, 2010 2:49 pm, David Brodbeck wrote:
Today I upgraded my system from FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE to FreeBSD 7.3-
RELEASE using freebsd-update. Samba no longer runs. I get the
following error messages:
Starting nmbd.
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/sbin/nmbd: invalid PT_PHDR
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi Mike,
What did you have in your /usr/local directory prior to the upgrade?
Had you installed any ports? What is the output of the following command:
pkg_info
it was only perl installed. That I can always rectified
Your mail to 'GeoClue' with the subject
Returned mail: see transcript for details
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will
Hello
Is there an utility to get the internal temperature from a HP Proliant
server with ACPI ???
Thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I used to use tapes, I have changed for disks, it is much much faster
and easier. And cheaper! In a 3U enclosure you can have 16 disks, for
32TB of storage.
A sun x4500 can get 48 drives in 4u. Its intel based so should run freebsd
ok if you want to. Not sure what the max drive size is but
Today I tried using portupgrade -R -f samba34 to rebuild samba and all
of its dependencies, but I'm still getting the same error. I'm a little
surprised that a minor version upgrade broke this so thoroughly. I went
back over the release notes to see if I missed any obvious caveats about
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
It's not that odd: nobody has bothered to update the default partition
sizes in sysinstall for a good few years, I
Hello everyone,
I have been using FreeBSD since 4.x for web related applications (php, Apache,
PostgreSQL, Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, etc.), and while I am not an expert, I feel
quite comfortable.
Lately I find myself in situations where I have I have to take care of legacy
Oracle (10g on Windows)
Hi,
What is the recommended parallel way for a person, who feels
comfortable with FreeBSD, when FreeBSD cannot do the job? - i. e. is
it a good idea to go towards Solaris, instead of Linux? Or rather go
towards some sort of Linux?
I see 2 questions in one.
What virtulization system to use?
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:13:21 +0100
Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk articulated:
I'd consider that bad advice: the defaults sysinstall chooses are
currently just wrong, and you should indeed be setting / to at least
1GB so you don't run out of space. The 'solution' of deleting
kernel.old or not
Seleção de Celulares da WeShipIt!
[1]E2 - Celular c/ 2 Chips [2]E3 - Celular c/ TV [3]L88 - Celular c/
Wifi [4]W99+ Celular c/ Windows [5]X10 - Celular c/ GPS
Apenas R$70,00 Apenas R$87,00 Apenas R$122,00 Apenas R$239,00 Apenas
R$271,00
Equipe WeShipIt,
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 07:18:18 -0400
Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
I also ran out of space. I decided that a minimum of 2GB was the
safest choice. It would be nice if the authors changed the default
settings in the soon to be released 8.1 version so as to nullify this
phenomena.
I've
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 07:18:18 -0400
Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
I also ran out of space. I decided that a minimum of 2GB was the
safest choice. It would be nice if the authors changed the default
settings in the
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 05:02:54PM -0700, Bill Tillman wrote:
Thanks guys.
:-)
Doesn't that seem odd that the default partition size for root
(512M) isn't quite big enough?
Things change slowly.
I think only a short while ago the default was 256 MB or even 128 MB.
Should I make the
Jerry McAllister writes:
Things change slowly.
I think only a short while ago the default was 256 MB or even 128
MB.
I haven't checked the logs, but I think it would have been more
than a short while.
Consider:
huff@ du -s /boot/kernel
225008 /boot/kernel
huff@ du -s
What virtulization system to use? Personnally I use ESXi from vmware
This was a great tip, thank you. I wasn't aware that ESXi is a bare metal and
free.
What OS to use instead of FreeBSD? It depends on what is recommended
for your application, what resources you have available around you,
Our company Diamond Sky, which is dynamically developing with every passing
year, is proud to offer you the convenience of great\perfect perspectives on
the prospective position of a service-manager.
We are acting as concierge services in 7 highly-developed countries of the
world. Our
Quoth Frank Bonnet on Wednesday, 07 July 2010:
Hello
Is there an utility to get the internal temperature from a HP Proliant
server with ACPI ???
Thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, July 7, 2010 2:20 am, mcoyles wrote:
Today I tried using portupgrade -R -f samba34 to rebuild samba and all
of its dependencies, but I'm still getting the same error. I'm a little
surprised that a minor version upgrade broke this so thoroughly. I went
back over the release notes to
Hello,All!
There is debugfs program dealing with ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystems.
Is there some tool in FreeBSD with functionality analogous to debugfs
which can operate on UFS2?
Could anyone give me a hint?
The thing is that recently I found out (thru smartctl)
several bad blocks on UFS2 partition.
Dmitry Lunts eingorn...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,All!
There is debugfs program dealing with ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystems.
Is there some tool in FreeBSD with functionality analogous to debugfs
which can operate on UFS2?
Not sure but fsdb(8) may help.
Could anyone give me a hint?
The thing is
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Dan Nelson wrote:
CA Roots are also self-signed, btw :) Addtrust is a valid CA Root, and is
the root for some certificates signed by Network Solutions and Comodo (and
probably others). Marco, the fetchmail manpage mentions a --sslcertfile
option; try adding --sslcertfile
In the last episode (Jul 07), Marco Beishuizen said:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, Dan Nelson wrote:
CA Roots are also self-signed, btw :) Addtrust is a valid CA Root, and is
the root for some certificates signed by Network Solutions and Comodo (and
probably others). Marco, the fetchmail manpage
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010, Iv Ray wrote:
What virtulization system to use? Personnally I use ESXi from vmware
This was a great tip, thank you. I wasn't aware that ESXi is a bare metal and
free.
What OS to use instead of FreeBSD? It depends on what is recommended
for your application, what
Hello guys;
I'm using a FreeBSD 7.0 in my firewall/gateway, and I have to connect
via VPN to a Cisco box.
The scene here is:
* Peer A (Cisco): 200.xxx.xxx.xxx
IPs that Peer B need to access:
- 192.168.10.24
- 192.168.201.196
- 10.115.90.236
* Peer B (FreeBSD 7.0):
What virtulization system to use? Personnally I use ESXi from vmware
This was a great tip, thank you. I wasn't aware that ESXi is a bare metal and
free.
That's the idea: bare metal and free, proxmox has something based
on... I don't remember. I opted for vmware becuase it seems to be more
The FreeBSD livefs ISO filesystem hides hard links, so they can't be
accurately copied.
Is relinking nearly everything in /rescue enough, or are there other
former hard links waiting to pop up?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
bsd writes:
I am trying to build a global backup solution for couple of strategic servers (7) based on two operating systems :
Depending on how much data you are trying to backup and whether an internet
backup solution would work, you may want to take a look at tarsnap:
28 matches
Mail list logo
