2010/7/21 Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com:
In the last episode (Jul 21), Jens Rehsack said:
On 07/16/10 18:13, Dan Nelson wrote:
Hi Dan,
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
On 07/16/10 15:07, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said:
Could you
Hallo
While upgrading port, I have the following problems:
- some cfg files are overwritten (authdaemon's authmysqlrc)
- some make install options are not kept (maildrop - not compiled against mysql
and courier imap - fam is compiled, even though initially was ruled out)
The upgrade sequence
On 22 July 2010 02:16, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Aiza aiz...@comclark.com wrote:
Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using
zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs
filesystem and I
Rich, if you can't get either the installation CD or live-file-system CD to
boot (FreeBSD), maybe your computer is allergic to FreeBSD? I've had that
problem with both FreeBSD and NetBSD on the older computer (Cx486DX-2 at
66 MHz; 1.2 GB hard drive). One thing that could possibly help is if you
Hi,
I am interested in having a production grade BIND9 implementation on FreeBSD.
My hardware is as below
Intel(r) Xeon(r) Processor X5560
I learned from the site that FreeBSD for ia64 is still in TIER2. Can you please
advise me on the below.
1. When it will be moved to TIER1.
2.
Hi,
Intel(r) Xeon(r) Processor X5560
I learned from the site that FreeBSD for ia64 is still in TIER2. Can
you please advise me on the below.
For Intel Xeon, I think you want the amd64 branch. ia64 would be for
Ithanium.
Bests,
Olivier
___
On 22 July 2010 10:17, Olivier Nicole olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
Hi,
Intel(r) Xeon(r) Processor X5560
I learned from the site that FreeBSD for ia64 is still in TIER2. Can
you please advise me on the below.
For Intel Xeon, I think you want the amd64 branch. ia64 would be for
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:35:48PM +0100, krad typed:
while we are on the topic of debugging I would recomend exim as an MTA. I
manage a few large enterprise mail systems with 10M + active accounts. A lot
of them are legacy systems that we gained through acquisitions. I generally
have to
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:58:39AM +0200, Peter Boosten typed:
On 22-7-2010 2:10, Aiza wrote:
If this apache jail is going to use the standard port 80 to listen on,
then the host and any other jails can not use that port number.
Nonsense!
Indeed
Since the IP address assigned to the
On 22 July 2010 12:26, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:35:48PM +0100, krad typed:
while we are on the topic of debugging I would recomend exim as an MTA. I
manage a few large enterprise mail systems with 10M + active accounts. A
lot
of them are legacy
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:32:36 +0100
krad kra...@googlemail.com articulated:
yep I know exim is sendmail cli compatible, but the output from sendmail is
not the same on exim (interactive prompt). You can probably get similar
output from sendmail, but with most things sendmail it is archaic and
Gentlemen,
Since the ONLY instance of Apache on this box will BE the one I'm
installing in the jail, I should just be able to connect to it by its
IP address...just like any other web server.
Yes? No? Am I missing something?
Ed
___
In response to Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com:
Gentlemen,
Since the ONLY instance of Apache on this box will BE the one I'm
installing in the jail, I should just be able to connect to it by its
IP address...just like any other web server.
Yes? No? Am I missing something?
Yes.
--
Bill
I agree, but I might start pulling parts and see if it works then. swap video
cards if you can, etc.
On Jul 22, 2010, at 3:28 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Rich, if you can't get either the installation CD or live-file-system CD to
boot (FreeBSD), maybe your computer is allergic to FreeBSD?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:32:36 +0100
krad kra...@googlemail.com articulated:
yep I know exim is sendmail cli compatible, but the output from sendmail
is
not the same on exim (interactive prompt). You can probably get
Hello,
Is 'pfm2afm' part of some port in /usr/ports? Thanks in advance
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel? Not in my name!
¿Solidaridad
It converts Postscript Font files into Adobe Font Manager files.
I've have not a use for it (yet).
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
Is 'pfm2afm' part of some port in /usr/ports? Thanks in advance
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f
El día Thursday, July 22, 2010 a las 09:47:52AM -0500, Ryan Coleman escribió:
It converts Postscript Font files into Adobe Font Manager files.
I've have not a use for it (yet).
Background of my question is the need of Type 1 font files which cover
most of the European Unicode scripts for the
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:57:10PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, July 22, 2010 a las 09:47:52AM -0500, Ryan Coleman escribió:
It converts Postscript Font files into Adobe Font Manager files.
I've have not a use for it (yet).
Background of my question is the need of
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:28:00 +0300
Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com articulated:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:32:36 +0100
krad kra...@googlemail.com articulated:
yep I know exim is sendmail cli compatible, but
--On Thursday, July 22, 2010 02:21:59 +0200 claudiu vasadi
claudiu.vas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the rmconfig-recursive. I did not know about it.
Nor did I. And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:15:10 -0500, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com
wrote:
And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what all the
make targets are in /usr/ports? Is this documented anywhere?
Yes, man 7 ports, section TARGETS.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD
On 7/22/10 1:15 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, July 22, 2010 02:21:59 +0200 claudiu vasadi
claudiu.vas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the rmconfig-recursive. I did not know about it.
Nor did I. And it begs the question - is there a way to find out what
all the make targets
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:28:54 -0400
Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
For starters, you are using the wrong sendmail. You need to use the
Postfix 'sendmail' version.
$ which sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail
I have Postfix installed and running. Sorry, I thought that was
obvious.
No I'm not going to start ripping my computer apart because FreeBSD can't deal
with my hard drive. I think the problem is a shortcoming in FreeBSD where it
can't deal with drives that have old stale RAID metadata on them. I'm just
going
to have to wait until they can. Until then no FreeBSD for
Then you can suffer through crappy windows or spend $50 on a hard drive...
On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Rich wrote:
No I'm not going to start ripping my computer apart because FreeBSD can't
deal
with my hard drive. I think the problem is a shortcoming in FreeBSD where it
can't deal with
Lol, true.
From: Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz
To: Rich rl...@pacbell.net
Cc: User Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 11:50:58 AM
Subject: Re: system hangs on; Probing devices, please wait (this can take a
while)...
Then
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Rich rl...@pacbell.net articulated:
Lol, true.
Two top posters in succession. My lucky day. In any case, the OP should
NOT have to suffer the agita of being forced to due either. While the
ability do accomplish what the OP desires does not exist ab
Caleb Stein caleb.st...@me.com writes:
the last lines of the output can be found here:
http://pastebin.com/8VAdvEjH
How should I fix this?
That's pretty weird; I can't make any sense out of it.
If it were me, I would start by making sure that the dependencies are
all up to date, and start
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:03:46PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Already use procmail so adding an automatic filter should not be
difficult if only I can come up with on.
Tried tr \240 ' ' testfile | hd and was not able to change the 0xa0
into anything. Have already spent much more time
Jeff Molofee n...@telus.net writes:
I've noticed software update pop up on the screen quite a bit lately.
Initially it popped up and did nothing. Now in 8.1-RC2 it pops up and
shows me that I actually have updates. When I click update, it seems
like it's actually attempting to upgrade the
Hi,
My name is Subburaj from India, I bought a broadband internet connection and
tried to connect with Freebsd system, I edited the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf with my
username, password and i.p address that my ISP gave me but its not going
through. I tried to troubleshoot with freebsd handbook and
Hi, Subburaj--
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, subbu 4u wrote:
My name is Subburaj from India, I bought a broadband internet connection and
tried to connect with Freebsd system, I edited the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf with my
username, password and i.p address that my ISP gave me but its not going
Hi folks,
I have Apache installed in a qjail named webserver (I.P. address
192.168.225.130) using the pkg_add -r apache22 command, but how do
you get Apache (or Bind, etc.) to automatically start upon boot?
I got the jail to start by adding qjail_enable=YES to hosts'
/etc/rc.conf and I also added
I have this interesting behavior in the top utility on _both_ my 7.1
and 8.0 FreeBSD servers (updated to latest patches). The interesting
behavior happens only when my kernel is compiled with the ULE
scheduler. It does not happen when the kernel uses the old BSD
scheduler.
Here is a link of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/22/10 6:20 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have Apache installed in a qjail named webserver (I.P. address
192.168.225.130) using the pkg_add -r apache22 command, but how do
you get Apache (or Bind, etc.) to automatically start upon boot?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:36:27AM -0700, subbu 4u wrote:
Hi,
My name is Subburaj from India, I bought a broadband internet connection
and
tried to connect with Freebsd system, I edited the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf with my
username, password and i.p address that my ISP gave me but its not going
Thanks Glen.
:-)
I'm not clear how I get the 'make config' to show the configuration
screen or the 'make install' to compile and install???
That might allow me to install Apache (with a limited number of
modules) like I want, but I don't understand what you're suggesting.
Also, do you know
On 7/22/10 6:51 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Thanks Glen.
:-)
I'm not clear how I get the 'make config' to show the configuration
screen or the 'make install' to compile and install???
Depending on what you've previously done in the www/apache22 directory,
a configuration may already exist. 'make
On 7/22/10 7:07 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
Also, do you know for sure that compiling from source and specifying
the install target (i.e., ./configure --prefix=/PathToJail
--enable-ssl...etc., etc., etc???) won't work?
It will work, sure, but make(1) and the port Makefile does this for you.
To
Oh, O.K., so I CAN just download the tarball (from
http://httpd.apache.org/), unpack and install it (just like any other
source install) and specify the jail as the target or did I
misinterpret you?
Sorry if I've missed your point!
:-)
Ed
___
On 7/22/10 7:19 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Oh, O.K., so I CAN just download the tarball (from
http://httpd.apache.org/), unpack and install it (just like any other
source install) and specify the jail as the target or did I
misinterpret you?
Do it from _inside_ the jail, not from the host.
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require an existing INDEX file
to process and since I
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require an existing
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 7/22/2010 8:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports require an
Is this port broken?
I can not get it to work.
It gives this message
cvs checkout: No CVSROOT specified! Please use the -d option
Cannot read the INDEX file. Give up
The manpage has no information about any options at all, so have no idea
how the -d option is to be coded. I do have a
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is this port broken?
I can not get it to work.
It gives this message
cvs checkout: No CVSROOT specified! Please use the -d option
Cannot read the INDEX file. Give up
I am not familiar with that port, but it looks to be a
For some reason I can not connect to *any* wireless network regardless
of the connection type unless I have WPA in /etc/rc.conf right
before DHCP. Why would I require this to connect to open networks?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Benjamin Lee wrote:
On 07/22/2010 06:20 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
Problem is in both cases the above ports
packagekit... moreso gnome-packagekit
On 7/22/2010 1:23 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jeff Molofeen...@telus.net writes:
I've noticed software update pop up on the screen quite a bit lately.
Initially it popped up and did nothing. Now in 8.1-RC2 it pops up and
shows me that I actually have
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I use.
I've heard of a few people trying to do things like this, and
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:14:12AM +0100, Matthew Seaman thus spake:
On 23/07/2010 02:20:02, Fbsd8 wrote:
I have a pristine install of 8.0.
There is no /usr/ports directory yet.
I am trying to use the portcheckout port and the porteasy port to
just populate the ports tree with only the ports I
53 matches
Mail list logo
