On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 AM, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves
that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors
request.
And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel there on base
openssl version and
2010/11/16 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 AM, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves
that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors
request.
And I'm interested how I can know
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/16 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com:
Please don't top-post, thanks.
Sorry. Wont will in future. But why?
Because it messes up the flow of reading.
I prefer to bottom-post.
How come?
What do you do instead?
No.
Wojciech Puchar woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
there will no no next language. there is no need to have C follower.
C is perfect
Which C are you referring to here? The original KR, ANSI, or some
other variant? ANSI C is different enough from KR C -- in strength
of typing if nothing else --
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Wojciech Puchar woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
there will no no next language. there is no need to have C follower.
C is perfect
Which C are you referring to here? The original KR, ANSI, or some
other variant? ANSI C is different enough from KR C -- in
I have the following card:
siba_b...@pci0:12:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x000c1028 chip=0x431514e4
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'
class = network
And it doesn't work with bwn driver (perhaps that's a
Le 12 nov. 2010 à 01:04, Olivier Mueller a écrit :
Good evening,
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 10:45 +0200, Olivier Mueller wrote:
Problem:
[...@pandora ~]$ php -v -c /usr/local/etc/php.ini-production
PHP 5.3.2 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 14 2010 18:11:48)
Copyright (c) 1997-2009
Olivier Mueller ha scritto:
Brillant! It fixed the issue, many thanks.
This is not the correct fix, the correct fix is to enable threads in
php, using the appropriate OPTION.
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 11/15/10 20:24, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
work with ZFS raidz2 pools. It seems that most of the 4k sector drives
are using emulation, and reporting 512 byte sectors to the OS instead
of their native 4k size. I know someone who had an issue trying to
insert one of these drives into a running ZFS
I was wondering why both the stable standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1
/ amd64 both have the exact release tag:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
Shouldn't they be different? What would be the correct tab for each
supfile respectively?
___
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:09:30PM -0500, pigskinwhite...@icqmail.com thus
spake:
I was wondering why both the stable standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1
/ amd64 both have the exact release tag:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
From: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/cvs-tags.html
RELENG_8
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:09 PM, pigskinwhite...@icqmail.com wrote:
I was wondering why both the stable standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 /
amd64 both have the exact release tag:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
Shouldn't they be different? What would be the correct tab for each supfile
On 16 November 2010 18:09, pigskinwhite...@icqmail.com wrote:
I was wondering why both the stable standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 /
amd64 both have the exact release tag:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
Shouldn't they be different? What would be the correct tab for each supfile
--
System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org
Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory
OS version:FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel)
manager(s):kde4-4.5.3
X windows: xorg-7.5X.Org X Server 1.7.5
___
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Actually, I don't see anything incorrect in the above archive post.
I do. Cherry picking ZFS deficiencies without addressing the proper
documented way to work around them or at even acknowledging it's possible to
do so is
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Steven Friedrich free...@insightbb.com wrote:
--
System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org
Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory
OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386 (6.4 MB kernel)
manager(s): kde4-4.5.3
X windows:
On 16 November 2010 19:26, Nathan Vidican nat...@vidican.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Steven Friedrich free...@insightbb.com
wrote:
--
System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org
Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory
OS version: FreeBSD
i was sure it have variable sizes but multiplies of 4k, anyway i dont care
;)
using 32 or 64K blocks (means 4 or 8K fragments) with UFS and full disks,
or partitions aligned to 4K solves all problems
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
no. ZFS is not usable and will never be usable for anything more than a toy.
This is a result of that design.
Actually I find the basics of its design pretty simple (cow/txg/zil)
and for that reason I think it is
Hello!
I'm in a process of installing a new server. I have already built and
installed a lot of ports over the past weeks, and now that I'm almost
done I discovered that one of the last things I need to install
(misc/amanda-server) needs Perl installed with threads support,
whereas I
snip
...
Actually I find the basics of its design pretty simple (cow/txg/zil)
and for that reason I think it is going to become very robust in the
near future, if it isn't already.
What is complex is the various journal and soft-updates code that
traditional file systems use.
But yes it has
On 16 November 2010 18:45, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 November 2010 18:09, pigskinwhite...@icqmail.com wrote:
I was wondering why both the stable standard supfiles on FreeBSD-8.1 /
amd64 both have the exact release tag:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
Shouldn't
Hello.
I've configured my X to use a 1600x1200 resolution (or so I thought...).
It used to work until the last X.Org upgrade; after that it *usually*
worked: very rarely it would start at 2048x1536, but a couple of
Ctrl-Alt-Backspace was normally enough.
Since a couple of day, it always
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:17 AM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
Chris Brennan wrote:
...
My Hiccup as the subject suggests is about my Wireless Card.
I have been following the handbook (
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/config-network-setup.html) on how to use
64-bit Windows drivers
On 11/16/10 20:23, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Actually, I don't see anything incorrect in the above archive post.
I do. Cherry picking ZFS deficiencies without addressing the proper
documented way to work around them or at
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I've configured my X to use a 1600x1200 resolution (or so I thought...).
It used to work until the last X.Org upgrade; after that it *usually* worked:
very rarely it would start at 2048x1536, but a couple of Ctrl-Alt-Backspace
was normally
Hi everybody dealing with ejabberd and/or erlang in a FreeBSD8-Jail !
I've built the ejabberd port (with ODBC support / the Erlang MySQL driver)
two days ago but can't get it to run.
# ejabberdctl start
spits out a huge bunch of Erlang error messages (unreadable for most
humans), obviously
Try www.rootbsd.net - FreeBSD VM's backed by great service.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Apparently only the version for kde4 is on the ports and I could not find a
package for 3.5. Building the available source had some interesting results but
ultimate did not work. What I finally did was google the 3.5 package name I had
installed and found a copy at the University of Kent.
29 matches
Mail list logo
